Who would win in the following wars:
Britain vs. France
China vs. Russia
Egypt vs. Turkey
***No nuclear weapons
>>74144042
brits
china
who cares
>>74144084
your whore mother does
>>74144042
1 France
2 Stalemate
3 Turkey (probably)
britain
russia
humanity
>>74144042
Dunno
China
Turkey
>>74144167
>humanity
>>74144167
>humanity
this
>>74144042
Britain
Russia
Turkey
Britain maybe
China easily
Turkey easily
>>74144042
1. France
2. Most likely china
3. Turkey
stalemate
China
Turkey
France
They would drop the whole affair 2 weeks in. Russia cannot navally blockade China, and China can't set up supply lines from its coast all the way to Moscow.
Turkey
Britain
China
Poison baits
>>74144042
Britain
China
Turkey
>>74144686
What's wrong?
>>74144686
>5x as many people
>at least 5x GDP
>diverse economy, not based 90% on natural resource extraction
Remember, war is a numbers game. US took 2x as many casualties as the Germans in WWII and still came out ahead, because we could afford to replace our losses.
>>74144042
UK
China
Turkey
>>74145120
>war is a numbers game
nah
if wars were only about numbers people wouldn't start them
>>74144042
Britain
China
Turkey
>>74145188
OP should have specified if the wars were
to the death or one side is forced to accept territorial losses.
>>74145433
no nukes, so I guess it's about territory
russia
RUSSIA
russia
who would win: Israel or Iran?
stalemate
neither would be able to advance much, but China could push more than Russia.
Turkey
>>74145665
Israel would win without firing a single shot
>>74144042
>Who would win
>Britain vs. France
Jews
>China vs. Russia
Jews
>Egypt vs. Turkey
Jews
>>74144042
France
China(Human waves tactic)
Turkey
>>74146092
t. cockroach
>>74146291
>Human waves tactic
what is that?
>>74144042
Stalemate, depends on the military objective
China
Egypt
>>74144042
>Britain vs. France
stalemate
>China vs. Russia
stalemate
>Egypt vs. Turkey
Turkey. Egypt is basically one river. The whole country runs along this river. The Roaches could either land and fight their way up it... they have the firepower, even though it would be bloody
Or, they could be smarter and block the river from Sudan. Egyptians start adding of thirst and surrender. Either way, a quick Roach victory.
>>74146336
You try to Swarm your opponent using your numeric superiority
It's what you did to the Germans during WW2
>>74146529
>French """army"""
>>74146679
we did some degenerative shit
>>74147514
>Be Russian "Army"
>Go to Chechnya
>Get BTFO
>Be French
>Go to Africa
>Topple any country you want
>>74144167
A hundred times this.
>>74147582
>>Be French
>>Go to Africa
>>Topple any country you want
Basically, the only thing you can do. Conquer African monkeys
>>74147910
Why do you all think russia would win
>>74148094
More like the only thing we are allowed to do. We should invade UK since they left the EU but people would say it's warmongering or some dumb shit like that (even tho when we do it to niggers no one cares)
>>74148094
Nope
We can topple pretty much any country in the world beside USA and China.
We're just not allowed to do so
>>74149084
>>74149389
How long has france been in a state of emergency? Can't even stop your own citizens from waging war on your streets.
Don't know about the others but for United Kingdom vs France I'm convinced that it would be a draw. We both are the most powerful countries in Europe.
>>74149084
>even tho when we do it to niggers no one cares
guess why
[spoiler]because they are niggers[/spoiler]
>>74149389
yeah, sure
not allowed
>>74149616
Maybe brits will attack this but today France has an advantage with modern weapons.
Before like Napoléon era for instance, it was still difficult to attack a fortified island as UK but now it's easy.
Their geo position means nothing with modern military buildings.
Honnestly France has a light advantage against UK.
>>74144042
Everyone else
>>74149616
>We both are the most powerful countries in Europe
what about germany?
>>74144042
France, China, Turkey
>>74144042
>Britain vs. France
France
>China vs. Russia
China
>Egypt vs. Turkey
The western civilization
>North Korea/China/Russia vs. USA
USA will finally pay for their genocides in germany and vietnam
>>74149847
Not him but Germnay is not a military power, that'why our minister of defense was angry at Germany because he said something like "for now France is the only country who defends Europe and we have to pay everything"
>>74149772
yea right id like to see anything get through the walls of dover
>>74149518
If the nationalists were in control, they would solve the non-whites problem in one day
>>74149964
Thanks for the clarification. I always thought that the UK and Germany are top two cunts, and you are the third.
>French army defends Europe
Now I see why there is so many arabs there
>>74150113
vote le pen! (No, please don't. I have a lot of savings in euros)
>>74150469
>and you are the third.
Troll, blacklisted
>>74145665
Well they don't share a border but assuming they did based on history:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arab–Israeli_conflict
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iran–Iraq_War
While Iran is probably better now, I'd still have to give it to Israel.
>>74150676
Don't you have the past tense in french? Or you have some problems with English?
>>74150998
What do you mean ?
I said you are a troll and you are now blacklisted
>>74151041
>I always thought that the UK and Germany are top two cunts
>thought
>thinkED
i hope this makes it easier for you to catch the idea
>>74144042
>Britain vs France
Britain
>China vs Russia
China
>Egypt vs Turkey
Turkey
>>74151215
But that's the reason, it's for your "I always thought"
The fact that you thought this in the first place.
So now you are blacklisted
>>74151312
>be defeated in like 40 days or so
>think you are superior to Germany
>>74151607
Not him but that was over 70 years ago
Since then their military has been fucked by America
Moreover we have nukes and they don't
>>74151975
fuck muricans
>>74150469
Le pen isn't enough to save France
By Nationalists i mean Identitarians, or Petaitinists
>>74152518
Never heard of them. Who are they? What is their ideology? Who supports them? Are these movements popular in France?
>>74150469
Fuck off you subslav cunt we are not the third power in Europe
>>74152793
Ok, the fifth then
Britain
China
Egypt (Pre coup I would say Turkey)
>>74152371
Take that back or I'll add Ukraine to NATO.
>>74152822
And who are before us then? We are the third nuclear power in the entire world shithead
>>74152940
no, you won't
>>74152949
UK Germany Russia and I can't figure out anymore, so ok, the fourth
>>74152940
>>74153240
>>74144042
brit
chink
hyroglyph
>>74153271
XD
good post
>>74146294
Did you just get offended by the most classic jewish joke?
>>74152617
>Petaitinists
I mean pétainiste, which mean the follower of Petain aka "Parti pour la France", "Terre et Peuple", and most of the genuine Nationalists in France
The good news is that the New President of the FN is Petainist
>>74144042
>Britain vs france
Britain, due to a better air force and better subs.
>China vs Russia
Humanity. Untold millions dead on both sides, both sides incompetence each other into a stalemate.
>Egypt vs Turkey
Turkey
>>74144042
Britain
China
Turkey
french and russian militaries are nothing without nukes
>>74155706
Doesn't Russia have lots of nice tanks
>>74155706
russia has military experience going back to the 90's and before. what recent conflict has the chinese been tested in?
>>74155769
it wasn't russia before the 90s, it was the SU. at least people had some kind of ideology back then. and also they would have been shot by their own comrades if the tried to run away from the battlefield
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barrier_troops#Barrier_troops_in_the_Red_Army
what i am saying is that most people would even fight for this shithole.
and we could only win with our numbers like in WW2. but considering chinese population it would be impossible this time.
and modern russia never participated in any big war either.
most military equipment is outdated, basically rebuilt old soviet crap.
and russia is too big, we wouldn't even be able to defend our borders.
>>74144042
britain
russia
turkey
>>74155754
>nice
they're trash. i bet if the chinese really wanted it they could steal the technology and build 1 million such tanks in a few months.
>>74146529
being an island in an industrialized world is a pretty relevant benefit
>>74155934
>would even fight
would NOT even fight of course
why are canadians such know-it-all douchebags
What does Britain even have over France ? Why do you suck their dick ?
Why would subs fucking matter when the Channel is barely 15 km wide ?
>>74156502
Because they could *teleport behind* the CDG and sink it before the frogs could do anything about it. I believe they carry cruise missiles, too.
>>74144042
Depends on the end-goal for each war...
In terms of total conquest:
>Britain vs. France
Neither has enough troops and logistics to conquer the other. It is skewed in Britain's favour because they have more sealift ships.
>China vs. Russia
Probably China. More troops, more modern equipment, much larger and brand new navy... It would probably come down to tactics and how well China could fund an army that has to push thousands of kilometers North and West to take Moscow. China doesn't have much battle experience whilst the Russians seems to have learned from mistakes during shit like the Chechnya and Georgian wars. However they don't have the troop numbers or the funding needed to take China
>Egypt vs. Turkey
Again, neither. Neither has the projection capabilities or the necessary transport equipment to effectively attack each other. It is skewed in Turkey's favour because they have a larger military budget and presumably better training as a NATO member, and they have a larger Navy
>>74156545
Why the fuck would we need the CDG, burger ? Don't you know how close we are ?
>>74144042
Stalemate
China
Turkey with unavoidable USA aid
>>74144042
>Meanwhile someone was eating rice
>Britain vs. France
Britain and Germany are paper tigers. There's no question that France is the strongest domestic military power in Europe.
>China vs. Russia
China would rape Russia, but there's really no strategic point to a war for either side, so I can't see the war continuing long enough to have a conventional victory.
>Egypt vs. Turkey
Egypt is a glorified river with an army, as well as having very deep political problems that would prohibit effective war. The turks are a (poorly) westernized nation with a decent military by middle east standards. Turkey would win easily.
France would definitely win. Their military is superior to the British military and the Royal Navy is a joke in 2017
This war is pointless since Putin and his friends are already selling us to China. even if it did happen, it would be a stalemate.
Turkey hands down. Egypt is pretty much a river, as others have already said.
>>74162470
呵呵,不用俄罗斯出兵,中国自己就投降了
>>74144167
>humanity