Do Europeans wear this brand?

>>74041991
Yes

>>74041991
RLPL line's the only one that isnt shit

>showing brands
Pleb af

>>74042329
this tbqh

File: 1490354825439.jpg (236KB, 963x1024px)

236KB, 963x1024px

>>74042329
>>74044583

>>74044612
Tell whoever drew that to fuck off and stop watching me

>>74041991
I do. Most bronies in Sweden wear it to recognize eachothers.

i used to wear this when i was blonde blue eyed kid

>>74046663
>Blacked

>>74044612
Slow people are inconsiderate. FUCKING MOVE!

Ralph Lauren & Lacoste polos are popular

They're seen as entry "luxury" brand that youth still can afford, you wear those if you want to be seen as someone who cares about how he dress

>>74046724
t. New Yorker

>>74046845
I agree
Lacoste is based

>>74046868
>Lacoste is based

maybe if you are 16

>>74041991
sometimes
i had couple of RL polo shirts

>>74046845
Lacoste is over priced and poor quality
Colours are good but that's it
amsterdam, Ralph, and tommy hill fugger are the only decent Polo tops
T. Only wears shirts and polo tops

>>74044612
>hair seems to overreact to wind
I don't get this one

>>74046940
How about American eagle? I have some polos and button downs. Decent quality.

too poor m8

>>74047024
Never tried em desu

>>74047093
Burberry tier t.bh. I am partial to FCUK, but it's expensive here.

File: 1200px-Lacoste_logo.svg[1].png (50KB, 1200x578px) Image search: [Google]

50KB, 1200x578px

No, we wear Lacoste

>>74041991
Only the good shit. Your label should read "Polo Ralph Lauren" not just "Ralph Lauren."

Lacoste and Hugo Boss