Question for Muslims. If you found out your wife or daughter

>>73910180
dunno, but
>nudeshaming
holy fuck white people are cringey

>>73910180
Depends on her age, and how hot her body oooks. If she would be uggo and less than 18, i would sell her to the whorehouse.

most mulsims have their daughter posing nudes for themselves

>>73910298
As a muslim i could confirm dis. Boys, too.

>>73910180
>antifa flag has flags on it

Is it autism?

File: 61868_front.jpg (77KB, 640x571px) Image search: [Google]

77KB, 640x571px

>>73910346
Probably designed by Konami.

>>73910494
Did other ds metroidvanias have the same shit?

>>73910512
No.

File: palestina.jpg (46KB, 900x601px) Image search: [Google]

46KB, 900x601px

>>73910180
I can't determine how severe my reaction will be, but i definitely won't not resort to violence if she's being a whore.
If she was just texting a boy, i could just take her phone, if it's nudes, i can't decide my reaction.

>look at meeee I'm naaaakeeeed

Who is this supposed to be rebellious to? 70 year olds?

>>73910595
Would you want your wife or daughter or mother revealing herself to strangers?

>>73910670
No, but I was really just talking about the pic.

>>73910670
does it really matter?
seeing a woman naked doesn't give you ownership over her
and you'll wank to her even if she wears a burqa so who cares

>>73910697
Exclusive access is valuable and lack of exclusivity devalues ownership.

>>73910727
nobody owns their images anymore, this is the age of internet and paparazzi drones
right now some girl is schlicking to your pic.... if you're attractive that is
but it's just an image

>>73910776
>right now some girl is schlicking to your pic
Sometimes I wonder if a girl has ever masturbated thinking about me. They probably imagine dit bigger than it actually is.

>>73910776
I'm not talking about I.P. rights or anything like that. I'm talking about the value of the woman.

If pornography is easier/cheaper/quicker to access, while getting a real woman naked for yourself remains difficult/costly/time-consuming, then pornography becomes a relatively better option from a cost-benefit standpoint.

Also, limiting supply increases value for a constant demand. The harder to get a woman is, the more valuable she is. Obviously naked pictures or even video is not the whole package but it's a part of it and increasing supply of that (indeed making supply infinite, in this digital age) makes the value of the woman bottom out. If everyone has easy and immediate access to a thing, it's not worth anything.

It also doesn't have to be a matter of wanting sexual value for yourself, which is why daughter and mother are relevant. If everyone knows that your female relatives are (by the reasoning above) worthless women, that reflects badly on you.

>right now some girl is schlicking to your pic
>implying there are any lewd pictures of me

>if you're attractive that is
>implying

>>73910967
>If pornography is easier/cheaper/quicker to access, while getting a real woman naked for yourself remains difficult/costly/time-consuming, then pornography becomes a relatively better option from a cost-benefit standpoint
of course,
but you still remain a virgin
it doesn't matter how much benefit you get from virtual elements like videos and videogames, you still need to do things IRL regardless of cost. you can't eat farmville fruits. you can't get a job by showing a duoling diploma. no matter how many hours you've got on the simulator, you can't say you flew an airplane or you dated a woman unless you go out and actually do it hands on
>limiting supply increases value for a constant demand
there's no such thing as "limiting supply" in the age of piracy. this is where you're incredibly wrong
second: it doesn't matter if you saw your mom or your hot classmate's pics, you still haven't had sex with them. the value remains, you just got a copy of their IMAGE. owning the poster of a McLaren doesn't make you owner of a supercar, just of its image

>>73911125
I'm talking about the value of any particular woman, not the incentives to pursue women in general.

>there's no such thing as "limiting supply" in the age of piracy. this is where you're incredibly wrong
Sure there is. Don't create pornographic images in the first place and the supply will remain at zero.

Again, I didn't disagree with you that having an image doesn't mean ownership. What I said was that non-owners having images devalues ownership. If the guy who owns the car forbids people to photograph it but charges them to come and see, he has derived monetary value. Perhaps he can also derive emotional/social value from keeping his car to himself as a point of distinction from those who don't have such a car. Likewise a pimp derives value from renting out prostitutes, or more wholesomely a husband derives emotional/social value from knowing that his wife is his and his alone in every sexual respect.

>>73911267
And I should say, it's not just the husband that benefits from this. A woman is more likely to get a valuable husband if she preserves her own value by exclusivity/limiting supply.

>>73910595
Probably, since it's been 70 years since we've last seen fascism.

>>73910180
insallah she gets the shoe

>>73910180
I really want to move to the States for the salary and comfy lifestyle, but that kind of retarded shit is certainly making me reconsider.

At least, they are still a small number.

>>73910564
can't decide = probably stoning

>>73910180
>Suckerpunch
>Hit her square in the face, from the front, would of seen it coming for miles

>>73910564
>taking her phone for texting a boy
wtf? Thats like something a hardcore christian would do here

Whats with middle eastern religions being so prison-esque to females?

>>73910180
>nude shaming
>conflates being nude to actually mean something, therefor equal to nude shaming just on the other side of the spectrum whilst facilitating the spectrum to begin with
This is the same with "racism" and "sexism".

File: 1490735750529.jpg (33KB, 720x528px) Image search: [Google]

33KB, 720x528px

>>73912260
>sweden

File: Raison d rape.jpg (149KB, 756x472px) Image search: [Google]

149KB, 756x472px

>>73910180
Rape. The answer is always rape.

>>73912777
you realise the majority of the muslim world has arranged marriages?

>>73910298
kek you are my favourite indo poster

>>73910564
>but i definitely won't not resort to violence
#justarabthings

>>73910180
>heavily doxxed
what's the difference between releasing someone's personal information and "heavily" releasing someone's personal information

>>73916997

If you just release it it's similar to the Fappening. It's out there, but not everywhere per se.
If you heavily doxx you are mass flooding every possible media with it so that way a massive chunk of people learn about it and can get to it with little to no effort.

Just my two cents, it's an idiotic expression either way

File: 1492854951799.jpg (213KB, 1536x1764px) Image search: [Google]

213KB, 1536x1764px

>>73916997
By "heavy doxxing", I assume they mean we found her parents divorce papers and her grandmothers Facebook page.

>>73910180
A backlash never went so well like this one

I would honor kill her like a good, pious Muslim, then feed her to dirty pigs, Allah's most unclean creatures

>>73910180
>punch some bitch
>she posts her tits on the internet in response
wtf I love angry right-wing manlets now