We need to abolish all roads and build stilted railroads
>eliminates habitat destruction because roads require destruction of forests, plains, etc while railroads can be built on stilts
>greatly reduces taxes because railroads can be privatized and require a fee
>obesity greatly reduced because people have to walk to the shops because there are no roads
>pollution greatly reduced because there aren't any cars
>can see stars at night because street lights won't be needed because there are no cars
Ancapenviromentalism is the true redpill
>>73567373
>>greatly reduces taxes because railroads can be privatized and require a fee
So happens with roads. And that's where your plan fails.
>>73567373
>ancap-
stopped reading there
>>73567464
All roads are public and waste tax payer money
Railroads take up a fraction of a fraction of the space of roads, and often are privatized
We need to abolish the pollution spewers and build high speed maglev rails
>>73567373
How about we abolish your life instead?
>>73567373
Roads?
>>73567547
>>73567543
>>73567532
Stop memeing and actually discuss the enviromental and economical benefits of demolishing roads and building railways
>>73567581
>Stop memeing
>Ancapenviromentalism
>>73567587
I don't know the official name of my ideology, all I know is that it's heavily enviromentalist, but has ancap ideals as well
>>73567631
?
What are you "no"ing at?
>>73567542
>All roads are public and waste tax payer money
They are not if they are under concession to privates. You pay tolls. I see where you want to go and I encourage you to work on it, but the idea that roads can not be privatized is nonsense. In principle, everything can be owned by private citizens.
>>73567673
t. roadslave
>>73567689
>t. railroadslave
>>73567542
> waste tax payer money
If shit can't fucking move around how do you thing income is generated?
I'm all for an eco balance but you are being a little bit to stupid
>>73567684
It's much easier to privatize railways because roads take up enormous amounts of space
25% of all human land use is paved roads
That's fucking insane
This requires government level control and guidance to make these massive projects happen
Railways are thin and don't take up no where near as much space, therefore isn't a massive space waster like roads are
>>73567719
Trains and ships move stuff around and don't require massive space wasters like roads
Any non-ancap commies ITT?
I wanna kick your asses
>>73567739
>Ships
Ships requiere massive dockyards and facilities just to unload, also my city is massive, far away from the coast and at high altitude, it can't have just one way to get the many resources that it needs
>>73567722
I love trains as well.
>>73567373
That's a nice birb. Mind if I save it?
>>73567797
Have fast trains carry stuff to and from your city
Once you build the infrastructure (massive job creator) roads will become obsolete, then you can leave the roads to overgrow with fields again so you can walk around everywhere without looking out for cars, because there will be no cars and trains will be on stilts going over your head
>>73567816
Don't mind, I saved the pic from /an/
it's a harpy eagle btw
>>73567802
I'm no train nerd, but I believe they are way more aesthetic than cars and trucks
>>73567839
>I'm no train nerd
You need to fall in love with the idea you are pushing anon
>>73567857
How can someone fall in love with a nonliving object??!!