Wow we really freed the shit out of Libya, didn't we lads?

>Free Arabs
>They return to their traditional pattern of constant war and slavery
Woah... so this is the power of freedom...

>being so rich that you can buy literal slaves

Don't think Libyans are that much worse off if they can just buy fellow Africans.

If Libyans were being sold in West African slave markets, then I'd be worried.

Capitalism HO!

Mission Accomplished

>>73462230
Anarcho-capitalist paradise

File: 1486894752147.png (91KB, 534x363px) Image search: [Google]

91KB, 534x363px

>>73462147
Yeah dude, bro, thank god we got rid of that evil dictator and brought them democracy eh? Praise America

well, technically yes. they are now free to own slaves

>>73462266
Most of the blames lies with the incompetent French this time around. They can't stop meddling in Africa, the fucking idiots. Luckily they're facing the consequences of it back home.

>>73462266
>Praise America
You should really be thanking France and Britain we just tagged along on this freedom fest.

>>73462266
Don't blame the US for Libya m8. The yuros are the ones who begged for our help to take out Ghaddafi.

>>73462147
yuroland did the majority of it.

>>73462317
>They can't stop meddling in Africa, the fucking idiots.
I've heard it explained that it's partially some post colonial guilt. Who knows though.

>>73462325
>>73462385
fucking brits and frogs

you can talk shit about germany what you want but when it comes to foreign policy they're the best. no fucking around in other countries. at least until now.

>>73462317
>>73462325
>>73462385
Even if Sarkozy pressured for it, it was the American government and military the ones who did the coup de grace with their no-fly zone and tomahawk missiles.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FmIRYvJQeHM

That entire continent would be better off undergoing a giant humanitarian program to sterilise everyone. They're basically the worse humanity has to offer, even making Russians and Brazilians appear civilised. It's a failed project.

>>73462431
>at least until now.
When they do fuck around in other countries it gets really ugly fast.

If you extend it to corporations, ones like Siemens have been fucking around in other countries.

>>73462507
This.

>>73462317
We just did what the US wanted us to do, like the blind puppets we are.

>>73462650
Then why didn't you follow us in to Iraq?

You can't say "b-but America made us do it" with Libya. We just helped you out because we actually support our allies.

>>73462843
because Sarkozy is a massive US Atlantist cocksucker, plus he's attracted by power like flies are attracted by steaming shits and wants to please the flavour-of-the-day big guys and be seen in cahoots with them, and back then the big guy it was Obama, so he willingly took even more US dicks in his mouth

he had his own interests in it too, obviously, as Kaddhafi was deeply involved in his political campaigns illegal fundings, so it was kiiling 2 birds with 1 stone for him

>>73462147
Merkel will be the highest bidder

>>73463168
What possible fucking reason did the US have for pushing for intervention in Libya according to your crazy conspiracy bullshit?

>Not really a threat to Israel
>Doesn't particularly have a lot of oil
>Wasn't trying to build or acquire WMDs
>Not a target for US nation-building aspirations

The French however totally had a reason for taking out Gaddafi, and Hillary basically confirmed as much in her emails. Gaddafi had long been attempting to form a North Africa alliance that would use its own currency undermining the French currency that's in wide circulation in the region.

This was 100% pushed by the French. Don't attempt to weasel your blame on the US.

>>73462431
They can't fuck around in other countries they don't have a military wtf

File: 1481427123905.png (442KB, 550x720px) Image search: [Google]

442KB, 550x720px

>>73463208

>>73462147
Arabs and blacks returning to their natural cultures and the free market is booming. What's the problem here

>>73462650
That's not true though, Sarkozy prompted for invasion because Gadhaffi was threatening French influence in North/West Africa and was the first government to recognize the Libyan rebels as the legitimate government for a reason.

>if I fall europe will be overrun by blacks
>western governments immediately step up bombing
It's almost like there's a correlation

>>73462147
Fake
Bag says migration service to europe

Muammar should have accepted Sarkozy's oil price proposal desu, Westerners may fuck around with gender theory and free speech issues but we surely don't joke about money.

>>73465469
I don't think it's supposed to be a picture of the actual slave market

>>73465943
Maybe there are babyslaves in the bags sold at discount prizes?

File: 1491406897950.gif (1MB, 480x270px)

1MB, 480x270px

>>73466109

That's what you get for Lockerbie biiitch

>>73466307
But they were bombed right after Lockerbie already, that score was settled.

The point is that Gaddafi visited France to renegotiate the sale of Libyan oil and gas. Sarkozy wanted to pay the same price as before and Gaddafi wanted to raise it. Since no agreement was met, two weeks later SURPRISE LIBERATION

File: average nigel.png (121KB, 879x755px) Image search: [Google]

121KB, 879x755px

>>73466307
haha yeah its so great that thousands of blacks enter Europe every month via boats from Libya

>>73466512
Why'd you post a picture of an Irish immigrant

File: yanks.png (347KB, 750x523px) Image search: [Google]

347KB, 750x523px

>>73466617

>>73463717
Gaddhafi was advocating for an oil market operating outside of the US dollar

Just as Iraq was doing

Just as Iran is doing (though they're protected by Russia and China, so freeing them is harder)

>>73466512
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pQ1tiTV-Ez4
You scared, little Irishman?

>implying there is anything freer than no goverment at all

>>73462147
Blame the French, the Libya War was literally their idea

File: IMG_9490.png (90KB, 640x614px) Image search: [Google]

90KB, 640x614px

>>73462147
Least they got freedom n shieet

>>73462317
>>73462325
>>73462431
>>73463717
>>73464216
>>73466307
>>73470401
Holy fuck this meme has been spouted here more and more often with each passing day.

Here's your answer
https://www.google.be/amp/s/amp.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/apr/12/barack-obama-says-libya-was-worst-mistake-of-his-presidency

>In 2014, Obama said: “[W]e [and] our European partners underestimated the need to come in full force if you’re going to do this. Then it’s the day after Qaddafi is gone, when everybody is feeling good and everybody is holding up posters saying, ‘Thank you, America.’ At that moment, there has to be a much more aggressive effort to rebuild societies that didn’t have any civic traditions.” In recent interviews with The Atlantic’s Jeffrey Goldberg on the “Obama Doctrine,” the president bluntly said the mission in Libya “didn’t work.” Behind closed doors, according to Goldberg, he calls the situation there a “shit show.”

File: 1370883948719.jpg (32KB, 250x250px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 250x250px

>>73462147
>West Africans can't save themselves from being enslaved

https://www.google.be/amp/s/www.theatlantic.com/amp/article/478461/

>And so America goes to war with an extremely short-term mindset, quickly toppling the bad guys but failing to prepare for the later challenges to come. All eyes are on smiting the oppressor because this is the kind of war people want to fight. The problem is that societies like Libya, Iraq, or Afghanistan are deeply traumatized by years of dictatorship, sectarian division, or civil war. Thomas Jefferson is not going to suddenly pop up when the wicked rulers are dispatched. These countries require years of international assistance that must tread the fine line between providing necessary help and avoiding neo-colonial control.

>In war, there are two good options for the United States. The first is regime change with a viable plan to win the peace. The second option is not to go to war at all. There is no point in toppling a tyrant if the result is anarchy.

>>73462422
Nah They need Africa to have some semblance of relevance and influence.

>>73462213
Slaves are actually cheaper now than they've been probably ever. I think it's like $90 to buy a human on average