Few hours ago cosmonaut Sergey Ryzhykov and astronaut Robert

File: 14708324220890.jpg (108KB, 960x719px) Image search: [Google]

108KB, 960x719px

>>73447921
Glory to humanity, hurrah for the space exploration!

Nice one lad

>>73448123
thanks

File: 1491763390948.jpg (41KB, 586x586px) Image search: [Google]

41KB, 586x586px

>tfw ur country uses 60 year old equipment and doesn't even propulsively land and recover all of its equipment

jk tho, it is pretty cool

File: 1491705178253.png (681KB, 1051x1080px) Image search: [Google]

681KB, 1051x1080px

>>73449147
>tfw you are a media clown propagating private space exploration on government donations and you still fail resulting in people having more trust to government than to you
jk tho, nice presentation

>>73449581
>tfw ur an envious German who can't accept that some people know engineering better than his country

>>73449581
You ignorant fuck.
I bet you're a Turk.

>>73449655
>>73449684
>Triggered muskfags
On all levels except physical SpaceX is a provate company.
[Gets funded by NASA internally]

>>73449838
>triggered airbusfag
Funny how you don't say it about the other companies too, and it's not like NASA just donated money to them, they fly supplies to the ISS for the money

File: exp49.jpg (1MB, 4000x3200px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 4000x3200px

>>73447921

>>73449913
>Funny how you don't say it about the other companies too
That's because I'm not trying to defend them and they don't really have this appeal of a massive media clownery faggotry. When it comes to space, government is the way to go. Deal with it.

>>73450039
Is this a joke?
In the eyes of the government, especially the US government, the space program is mostly a jobs program, with some science on the sides. Look at projects like the SLS and Orion, they are made inefficient on purpose. Maybe government was the way to go earlier, when the technology was at it's complete infancy, but right now, SpaceX and BO are doing great stuff, at a fraction of the cost.

>>73450115
Was SpaceXmade inefficient on purpose too? It sure would explain why it only survives on NASA life support.

>>73450998
What is even this argument? SpaceX is probably the most efficient aerospace company now. It only had financial problems in the beginning, certainly not today.