Why can't anglos write in cursive?

>>72939938
Who says we can't?
I write in cursive all the time, and I know others who do too

>>72939938
i can write in cursive though...

Writing in cursive is too slow

>why cant anglos
>3 americans reply

WE

my handwriting looks even more shit in cursive, it's annoying to write for me as well

>>72939956
>>72939978
Then why americans write with print letter all the time?

>>72939995
It's the opposite. Cursive is faster and demands less energy than print, the only people who write on print outside anglo countries are the ones with bad cursive handwritting.

>>72939938
who actually writes anything anymore?

>>72939938
my handwriting is cursive

I write in a mix of print and cursive and it's really hideous, but it's fast and I can read it so whatever.

>>72940114
People in the first world don't write letters by hand, Paolo. The only time we have to use pens for words is to make signs or notes.

>>72940137
This

Too messy. If I write in cursive it looks like scribbles on the page.

File: 1480516029669.png (29KB, 657x527px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 657x527px

>>72939938
I write in cursive but it's shit and something I'm pretty self-conscious about. The days where your plumber could write impossibly beautiful long flowing strokes that make it seem like some sort of 16th century poem are long gone