Alexander the Great and Cyrus the Great added

>>72663859
Weird because Greece did not exist back then.

>>72663859
>France
>A FUCKING WOMYN
>A FUCKING ITALIAN

>Arabia
>A FUCKING KURD

>Egypt
>A FUCKING WOMEN
>A FUCKING GREEK

File: 1470762701282.jpg (52KB, 469x596px) Image search: [Google]

52KB, 469x596px

>>72663920
Are you literally retarded? Especially a German should be able to understand it. Or maybe not, considering you've made a point out of airbrushing your history.

>>72664027
Egypt makes sense though. From a Western (read: post-Roman) perspective Cleopatra was one of the most important Egyptian leaders. Arabia makes as little sense as Ghandi (no, just because they've been doing it since the first game doesn't make it right) and France is straight up retarded (neither French nore a ruler). Personally I'd put Abu Bakr in charge of Arabia (first Caliph of Islam, kind of a big deal) and for France
>power behind the throne
>sneaky as fuck
>loves gathering wealth
>recognizability is important (hence retarded choices like Saladin and Ghandi)
Richelieu fits the bill even better than Catherine, and he's practically universally known. Ask a schoolboy in Japan to draw Richelieu and he'll be able to give you a rough sketch that vaguely resembles him.

Especially France baffles me. They need to fill their diversity quota and I get that they're sick of rehashing Napoleon over and over, but there are far better candidates from far more suitable countries. Just think of Isabella of Castille for example, who actually was one of the more important leaders in Spanish history as she (and her husband who ruled Aragon) are credited with both unifying Spain and finishing the Reconquista, springboarding a divided bunch of second rate European kingdoms to the superpower Spain would later become. You can fill your diversity quota without being full retard about it, you know?

>Montezuma

FUCK OFF

FUCK OFF .

FUCK OFF

FUCK OFF
.
FUCK OFF

FUCK OFF

REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

>>72664720
What's wrong? I mean I know it's not the correct spelling of his true name, but beyond that?

>>72664645
I'm willing to bet that they didn't want a second Isabella of Spain in there. England could jettison Elizabeth and still have Victoria, but Spain had problems in that regard. I mean, hell, Poland got a literally who because she happened to be the only female leader in its history.

>>72664929

I just want somebody else besides Montezuma.

>>72665013
You have a few problems with that.
>1. Aztecs are way more interesting both culturally and aesthetically than modern Mexico, so you need a specifically Aztec leader
>2. The only Aztec leader anyone outside of Mexico has ever heard of is Montezuma
I mean I agree that it's not fair, but there is reasoning behind it. The real problem is that no Mexico means no Latin country besides Brazil, which is kind of horseshit.

>>72664996
>They don't want a second Isabella
>Doing Montezuma and Ghandi over and over again is fine
I'm not insulting you personally or anything, I'm just lampooning how retarded Firaxis is being.

>>72665135
Considering they went with Pedro II for Brazil, Roosevelt for America and John Curtin (LITERALLY FUCKING WHO?) for Australia, Mexico wouldn't be out of place with Zapata or Pancho Villa. If I'm not mistaken especially the latter is considered a national hero in Mexico.

>>72665375
Brazil at least makes sense because Brazil has a shitload of people in it (200 million) and they wanted customers. Teddy Roosevelt is a world famous American president. John Curtin though you are correct about, I have no fucking clue why Australia is even in the game before like Holland, Portugal, Sweden, Ottoman Empire, Nubia, Zulus, Songhai, Morocco, god I could go on forever about more deserving civs.

But I would also like to see a Latin country besides Brazil, I just don't think they'll add both Mexico and Aztecs. Best we can hope for is Argentina.

>>72665375
I think they keep having Moctezuma and Gandhi for meme reasons, muh nukes and muh fucking asshole why are you attacking me again??

>distinguish between Macdeon and Greece

That's because Macedonians are Slavic while Greeks are Hellenic.

Pedro looks arab hehe moortugal

File: Map_of_Modern_Ghana_Ghana_Empire[1].jpg (103KB, 514x691px) Image search: [Google]

103KB, 514x691px

>>72665723
Modern Macedonia is about as related to Alexander's Macedon as modern Ghana to historical Ghana.

>>72665883
I'm still astonished that Brazil got in before Portugal.