Are Romanian people white?
>>72231076
Would you breed with it? No? Then it's not White.
>this is how a half turk half romanian looks like
A true balkan rape baby
>>72231076
White countries
>Canada
>USA
>Australia and New Zealand
>all of Europe(except the Balkans)
Balkans are just Turkish rape babies
>>72231076
Whether or not I think it's true, I am obliged to say no.
>>72231076
Remove gypsies and they're our latin brothers.
But judging by the absolute state of Europa right now, I would say thay they're white compared to others
>>72231552
The the Balkans were occupied by the ottomans for years, how are they white?
>>72231434
>New Zealand
>white
What?
We are only 2/3 white at best
>inb4 old ethnic censuses
Our immigration rate is triple that of western Europe's
>>72231576
Didn't say they were but go in Bucarest you'll see less darkies than in Paris, London or Washington
>>72231552
>>72231766
>t. vlach scum begging in paris
>>72231076
Almost everyone is "white" in America, so yes.
>>72231434
>new zealand
>white
epic
>>72231576
Because:
1) they weren't colonised by Turks, the original population of Hungarians, Vlachs and Germans remained
2) occupation and control does not equal population replacement, how many white Britons do you see in modern Somaliland or blonde Dutch in West Papua? And why does /int/ have such big problems understanding this?
3) Wallachia and Moldavia weren't Ottoman provinces in the first place, their rulers were vassals of the Sultan instead.
>>72238109
Because they were about the same a thousand years ago.
You only say that because you delude yourseld into thinking you dont have north african or roman ancestry.
Youre probably one of those basques who think theyre pure Iberians
>>72234809
>>72231581
tbf he did count the US too
I used to talk to a Romanian girl on Skype. She had the whitest skin and pinkest nipples I've ever seen. Most are not white though
>>72231076
yes, they are.
>>72231260
but ismet, turks are not really turks