What do you think your city look like in 20~ years?
>>72201757
half brbr half china
already WIP in progress
one day a bomb will fall on all of this
>>72201757
#believe
http://www.sweco.se/en/our-offer/architecture/urban-development/colombo-port-city-sri-lanka/
The subway is still not ready.
Probably the same. Maybe they'll tear down a few old shitty high rises and build newer ones.
>>72202140
SWEDE'D
>>72201757
The same as of today with other shops.
nothing special
>>72202140
>le vegetation on buildings maymay
I hate this new trend
>>72202462
more like chink'd
>Client: China Harbour Engineering Company Ltd
>>72202955
Naturist
>>72202955
>>72203117
>paris still standing
dumb leftists and their dreams
>>72203117
haha
benis
>>72201757
this is 115 years
>>72203487
in another 115 years it will look like this
>>72201757
A little cleaner, maybe
Or an irradiated crater
Fuck knows
>>72203521
More like this
fucking exactly the same, only with 50.000 more people and hopefully better roads
>>72203586
>russia an irradiated crater
One can always dream
Anything like this
>>72202140
>>72203117
>all those trees
>clean streets
haha
>>72203727
> another tiny country dweller forgets the size of Russia
Come on now, my city is one thing but 15% of land surface? What do you think will Finland be left with as borderlands to an irradiated desert
>>72203746
>all those trees
whats wrong with it
pretty normal
>>72203634
>>72201864
you're envious totalitarian piece of shit
>>72203967
>>72203634
No, even Baghdad is whiter than London
>>72201757
Even more of a paki shithole
In 20 years Toronto could reach global city level only achieved by NY and LA in North America.
>>72203744
so, your city will suffer from poor image compression in the future? this sucks, broder
>>72204911
And it will be entirely full of poos, chunks, and scraps of the inevitable African population explosion by then
>>72201757
We will have the same 40 year old houses
>>72205142
Charleston > Charlotte
>>72201757
all projects till 2020 included in this picture
Probably like this
>>72207622
>And it will be entirely full of poos, chunks, and scraps of the inevitable African population explosion
>>72203117
Lol how delusional can someone get
2050 is to 2017 what 2017 is to 1984
There should be almost no difference.
>>72201757
Worse.
Shanghai is so nice on this 90 picture but modern is a commieblock hell.
>>72201757
since there is a heavy emphasis on keeping the cultural heritage of our downtown, I'd say the south side of the waterfront will probably become more urban while keeping the comfy oldtown buildings in the north end
it will most likely double in size due to the relocation of baytown population to the city and added migration from other parts of atlantic canada
>>72201757
Full of real estate developers, the homeless, and out-of-state yuppies.
Oh wait.. it already is
Marseille will become a rightful islamic city
>>72201757
1990 Shanghai has more character and looks overall more pleasant, capitalism was a mistake.
>>72201757
It will look like Luanda.
>>72201757
In 20 years lisbon will have completed it's mission and no other city in the country apart from it will exist. My house will be a mining pit or a potato farm.
>>72203117
That would look pretty shitty during winter. And imagine all the dead leafs durung autumn.
Not much different I guess.
They're planning four new skyscrapers, doubt there will be much more to come.
>>72211029
why europoors even build tall buildings?
we still have next to no towers in our 'european' city (St.Petersburg)
>>72201757
It will look almost the same
>>72211284
Riga has 3 (modern) towers in total, all of them located on the left bank of the river. There's also the TV tower and some Soviet highrises, but that's about it.
I like skyscrapers tho, wouldn't mind if Riga had more
Everything is chrome in the future!
pic unrelated
>>72216372