Why isn't the left the intelligent side anymore?

Why isn't /int/ about international culture anymore?

>>71293581
why americans shart? :DD

>>71293581
What defines international culture too you is a canadian or a spaniard complaining about their mums asking them to get a job international culture or all of us complaing about being NEETs or pointless memes? Fuck off retard.

File: 1464948432493.jpg (368KB, 1722x1516px) Image search: [Google]

368KB, 1722x1516px

Why don't the Americans celebrate Easter?

File: Republican_Party.jpg (30KB, 512x384px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 512x384px

More like, how come the left isn't the edgy provocative side anymore?

>>71293619
That has nothing to do with international culture either. Like this thread. You are pure cancer. Kill yourself.

>political side
>intelligent
.t radical centrist
*tips*

File: toad spotlight.jpg (70KB, 1154x1098px) Image search: [Google]

70KB, 1154x1098px

Why Americans hates Easter?

>>71293565
>anymore

>>71293565
>>71293658
Because they're too afraid to offend.

>>71293565

They went nuts and turned into a hugbox circlejerk. They're like the crazy guy on the bus that makes you uncomfortable and nervous.

>>71293565
Look up Marcuse and Adorno. Their form of Marxism is as anti-scientific and anti-empirical especially in sociology as fundamentalist religion.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gbzhmMDFcFQ

File: 1481983989665.jpg (40KB, 487x491px) Image search: [Google]

40KB, 487x491px

>>71293565
>Christopher "I support Bush's War in Iraq" Hitchens

They began siding with the developing world, against the developed world, on every single issue; even when the developing world held an immoral stance.

Salman Rushdie? He brought it on himself; should've shown respect for a great religion.

Osama bin laden? Literally the result of American foreign policy and economic inequality caused by international capitalism.

ISIS? I don't want to talk about ISIS or about and stopping them, I want to talk about how American terrorism and international capitalism created ISIS.

People like to shit on Hitchens because it's easy to beat up on the dead, but he consistently agreed with Chomsky that America committed a long history of war crimes. Hitchens even defended Chomsky when Chomsky pointed out that the "2.1 million" killed by Pol Pot was fabricated to include the 800,000 killed by the bombing campaigns of Richard Nixon.

Where the disagreed was that Hitchens felt that American foreign policy still had the potential for doing good, despite it's clearly evil past; and that "radical Islam", though increased by international inequality, existed long before the rise of capitalism. Chomsky felt that the US could do nothing but wage war against the third world abroad; and anything positive the US brought to the world was through social change at home.

Essentially they both agreed on many things, but emphasized different wavelengths. Hitchens wanted to talk about the insanity of evading discussion about third-world mass murderers; while Chomsky might acknowledge their crimes, felt he had a duty to emphasize America's creation of them, since he felt that was something he could actually change.

File: 1419857912544.jpg (39KB, 330x319px) Image search: [Google]

39KB, 330x319px

>>71293620

File: 1474960274391.png (14KB, 640x480px) Image search: [Google]

14KB, 640x480px

>>71293691
literally me