Really makes

File: muslims and forests 2.png (82KB, 1350x1314px) Image search: [Google]

82KB, 1350x1314px

me think

>>71240895
Why isn't the UK coloured in the first one as well?

>>71241043
UK is like 4% Muslim while France is around 8%

File: (13).png (21KB, 900x900px) Image search: [Google]

21KB, 900x900px

>>71241233

>>71240914
Does China have so little forested area due to natural circumstances or because it's been deforested?

lets degitize quran

File: China-physical-map.gif (659KB, 1412x1115px) Image search: [Google]

659KB, 1412x1115px

>>71241457
Himalaya and Gobi, that's already half of the country

>>71241379
What's the issue?

>>71240914
we muslim nao, thanks allah!

>>71241457
they have fucking deserts and mountains boi, it's a percentage
its like aus, we have plenty of forests, more so than most on this map. China is likely the same (lots of different types too). It isn't comparable to a lil bean country with a few forests of one type.

>>71246166
Yeah, I asked because even the US is listed as being more forested despite having high mountain ranges, desert, the great plains, and deforestation for agriculture.

>>71241233
France only 8%? Bullshit

>>71240895
Unfortunately a combination of shipbuilding and being the world's first industrialised country, we've lost lots and lots of trees. We're planting a few million per year, but it needs to be more and sped up.

>>71247215
Muslims are always centralized in the big cities hence why Paris is such a shithole. We only have ~6% but cities like Malmö are complete shitholes since literally a fourth of the muslim population lives there.

>>71247271
We had 5% tree coverage after WW1 (currently at 14%). It's slowly creeping up.

File: red squirrel335.jpg (826KB, 2000x1333px) Image search: [Google]

826KB, 2000x1333px

>The United Kingdom, being in the British Isles, is ideal for tree growth, thanks to its mild winters, plentiful rainfall, fertile soil and hill-sheltered topography. Growth rates for broadleaved (hardwood) trees exceed those of mainland Europe, while conifer (softwood) growth rates are three times those of Sweden and five times those of Finland. In the absence of people, much of Great Britain would be covered with mature oaks, except for Scotland

We need to keep planting those trees tbqh.

>>71247087
>high mountain ranges, desert, the great plains
True but significantly less than China

File: 1481830580100.png (67KB, 300x300px) Image search: [Google]

67KB, 300x300px

>>71240895
>Western Sahara doesn't have less than 15% forest

>>71247215
You just don't realise that you could be in a neighborhood that's 70% muslim shithole, walke 5km and be in a 100% French residential area
Muslims just roam hub parts of the city where there's a lot of trafic, but stray a bit afar from them and they're nowhere to be found.
It's the same with any cities in northern Europe. They look very present but barely are in 5% of the total area of the city

File: 1478069449981.jpg (77KB, 960x540px) Image search: [Google]

77KB, 960x540px

>>71240895
Great Bongistan confirmed

File: 1470554702027.jpg (39KB, 600x568px) Image search: [Google]

39KB, 600x568px

Wait, is it normal to have lots of forested land in a country?

I thought most of Europe would be like Britain tbqh. Not many whatsoever. Hard to picture where we'd even fit forests in.

File: crusade.jpg (89KB, 800x800px) Image search: [Google]

89KB, 800x800px

>>71240895
>tfw we will see the establishment of an uruguayan caliphate in our lifetimes

>>71247844
Contintal Europe isn't as crowded as we are, only Belgium (mainly Flanders) and the Netherlands are denser. Our population is also expected to exceed France and Germany this century, rising due to immigration and births by blacks and the like. We've got a bright future ahead of us.

File: bangladesh.jpg (11KB, 275x183px) Image search: [Google]

11KB, 275x183px

Source? I struggle to believe that Western Sahara has more than 15% forest, or that Bangladesh has less than 15%.

File: 1468893397935.jpg (118KB, 1252x1252px) Image search: [Google]

118KB, 1252x1252px

>>71247955
fug

>>71247844
That's what happens when your country is 85% cities.

>>71248081
Around 90% of the land mass of Great Britain is not built on, so it's either spread out and lose the beautiful countryside.