Caliphate in France when ? Harem arrives soon like in the good

>>71004629
>Thanks Islam
Average frog will fuck ugly rosaties or die for imaginary cunt. But it good think. I hope all french-cuck will ethenicaly replaced and then nigger will burn out all your culture. Especially architecture in Pari. Total Halal, give them hell, pedophile warlod.

>>71004629

Paternity tests still illegal?

>>71004629
They're all watching porn on their phones anyway.

>>71004830
Cuck my shit up with that grammar, m8. I'm too drunk.
Fuck cuck-frogs with leftist """"""""""intelectualls"""""""""
Es lebe der Führer!

>>71004629
oh no god forbid children see something which is natural and a core part of how humans have survived.
this hurts my feelings and i am outraged.pls ban

>>71005887
kys

>implying Islamists wouldn't be more the type to ban porn altogether

>>71004629
What exactly is a "REAL" sex scene? Do regular French cinema's show porn?

>>71004629
based frogs

>>71007569
yeah this is a bit dubious, plenty of movies have very graphic and raunchy sex scenes. Do they mean they're just going to get Pornhub up and run through some videos, lol? Or do they mean artsy movies with sex scenes that are supposedly real? What's even the difference between "REAL" and fake in movies when they fake them to look no less real than the real sex would look in the context of movies. Plain pornography is a bit different when compared to both real and faked movie sex.

>>71007569
I think they mean unsimulated scenes. Don't know how much of that exists in cinema though.

>>71005887
This. 20 murders on screen is fine but a dick pic is far too much.

>>71005887
Being introduced to something sexual at young age (even if it's just viewing) can have a harmful impact on kids, skewing their perception on what is considered normal and healthy.

t. molested by an older woman as a kid.

bud why
just to enrage minorities i bet

>>71008572

>t. molested by an older woman as a kid.

noice

>>71008864
Not forcibly but still taking advantage of a 7 year old can leave a lot of damage, for example I became sexual at a younger age and consumed porn at a higher amount. I also spent a lot of time trying to recreate the scenario of what had happened. Is it hot in New Zealand?

>>71008572
While it CAN be harmful, as long as what the children see are healthy natural interactions it's actually BENEFICIAL and prepares them to have a better understanding and control of their own sexuality.

Assuming the child is growing up in a society where sexuality is a significant part of adulthood, it's actually pretty important.

If they're growing up in a society of sexual repression or extreme control (not always a bad thing, but uncommon in modern first world countries) it becomes less important since the early experiences may be misleading.

>>71009142
Samefag here.

Just wanted to clarify that I mean letting them disover sexuality at their own pace as the interest grows, not actively encouraging or discouraging it.

Jesus, I sound like a fucking newage hippie but it's what I think works here.

>>71009142
>>71009414
I don't disagree with you however there is a fine line between education that is beneficial for sexual health (both physical and mental) of younger people and showing unsimulated sex in films to younger audiences which WILL have a negative impact on them. Porn is damaging, it skews what is considered normal sexual behaviour and eventually seeing two naked individuals will not be enough to excite and the user falls deeper into different fetishes.

>>71009632
It depends if the stuff in the films is realistic sex or not, and if it's in a healthy relationship. I agree that most pornography is unrealistic and disconnects from the sex to focus on only one or two things.

I think we'll need less direct education on sexuality in schools or from parental lessons if there was a little more healthy passive exposure at acceptable ages.

It's why I don't mind kids seeing breastfeeding babies or their own sex in locker/changing rooms.

>>71004866
wow. that's insane.

>>71009844
>It's why I don't mind kids seeing breastfeeding babies or their own sex in locker/changing rooms.
There are people who have a problem with that?

>>71004629
To some extend it's allowed here too, if you are 16. Porn and brothels are for 18+ though.

>>71008572
>t. molested by an older woman as a kid.
based

>>71004830
>>71004930
*cringes*

>>71008572
>Being introduced to something sexual at young age (even if it's just viewing) can have a harmful impact on kids

Yes humans are the special snowflake animal that is solely "mentally ravaged" by sexual depictions at the age nature intended, puberty.

File: 1486610372594.jpg (54KB, 342x302px) Image search: [Google]

54KB, 342x302px

>>71008572
>seeing a sex scene in a movie is the same as being molested

>>71012386
Not the same but there is a certain age for things and I believe being introduced to a sexual situation at a young age (even if its just seeing) can lead to harm. Also read OPs post, its real (unsimulated) sex.

>>71005887
porn addiction is going to become one of the biggest mental issues in the following years, and is a main driver in decadence

>>71012509
Personally I think lack of exposure to sex is more harmful. Once children develop adult sexuality, they have a lack of orientation due to our cultural prudishness, which causes them to turn to porn for orientation, because they lack alternatives.