which is better, to have a gf or paying hookers?

hookers

>>70971978
How so?

>>70971954
I think that would depend on what kind of "gf" it is, and what kind of hookers they are.

Sex might be better but it's temporary and expensive. And prostitutes cannot replace an emotional connection

File: 1367652256079.jpg (25KB, 258x171px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 258x171px

Neither.

>>70971954
just masturbate.

>not enjoying both at the same time

Being loyal to your gf while boning hookers just to not get bored with your gf is honestly a pretty pragmatic choice

have a wife and children

>>70973426
>don't have to finance her housing and boarding
>less time-consuming
>much more variety
>don't have to waste time interacting with her dimwitted friends

>>70971954
Gf! If not One night stands! Just not hookers!
Hookers are bad and expensive. Sex should be free.

File: 28e~01.jpg (11KB, 277x267px) Image search: [Google]

11KB, 277x267px

>>70973485
Hookers it is.

File: IMG_0587.jpg (203KB, 779x1023px) Image search: [Google]

203KB, 779x1023px

>>70973470
This. It's one of the commandments.

Next to the commandment for bearing arms.

>>70973485
>>don't have to finance her housing and boarding
A relationship is suppose to be mutual. If you're paying for everything you're just a cuck and a loser.
>>less time-consuming
That depends on if you're trying to optimize/free up time(for what?)
>>much more variety
There is far more single women in a country than prostitutes.
>>don't have to waste time interacting with her dimwitted friends
That doesn't have to be, nor should it be the case.