If Japan and Britain had a war one on one, which would win?
right now I think Britain, but Japan is capable of having much stronger military
>>70965142
Doesnt the UK have nukes while Japan doesnt?
>>70965142
Country with nukes vs country which has no military according to its constitution
>>70965142
the rest of the world
>>70965204
Same British girl as above
>>70965142
why ask this question?
do you want a fight?
Probably neither, assuming no nukes
The edge would ostensibly go to Britain for their stronger navy, but they have no way of effectively invading a country that can put up any kind of organized resistance, let alone carrying out a prolonged campaign in one.
>>70965142
Is your country racist?
Please a serious answer, i'm getting a scholarship
>>70966598
i'd be surprised if op did answer ... this seems like another one of those nip threads made for replies
hmm
>>70965142
>which would win?
China
Dumb elevens
UK
>>70965206
This. Japan literally has no military.
Anyone with a glock could literally walk into Tokyo and declare themselves the new emperor.
>>70969627
hot
>>70966598
no
japanese people might be xenophobia, but not racist.
you are just a gaijin regardless of race, and don't have to worry about hate crime.
In a low intensity war, defensive side, because currently Japan has little to none power projection to mount an amphibious campaign against a country like Britain, and vice versa: British one is too small to do anything against Japan as the JSDF can easily wipe out British fleet in Japanese water.
In a total war without nukes, of course Japan.
In a total war with nukes, of course neither.
JSDF is a joke, so UK obviously.