How come Germanics are so subhuman?
>>70869519
Do anglos consider themselves le germanique?
>>70869519
>a fucking sub 80 IQ albanian
>>70869821
No. We are better than germanics.
>>70870044
so you are french?
>>70869519
Go home, Zog.
>>70870139
British. The frogs are subhuman compared to us.
>>70870044
True but you are still subhuman, being better than poo doesn't mean you are not garbage
>>70869519
cause you make this thread 3 times a day
>>70869519
>Germans, Swiss, Flemish
Gauls(Celts)
>Austrians
Norici(Celts)
>English, Irish, Scots
Britons(Celts)
Only the Nords are truely Germanic
>>70870282
Do you understand how irrelevant your little shithole has been throughout history? You're lucky you're behind a computer screen because if you said this to my face I'd snap your neck at the speed of light you worthless Scandinavian cuckold cunt.
>>70870364
>Do you understand how irrelevant your little shithole has been throughout history?
yes, that's why I make threads about it all the time, Anglos are better but still vomit tier t b h
Anyone is subhuman compared to me boy
>>70869519
Because the best ones left for England
(schlesweig-holstein is rightful anglo-saxon land)
>>70870341
The Nordics have quite a lot of Slavic / Finnic admixture.
The north of the Netherlands and northern (northwestern) Germany are the most germanic
>>70870558
>Germany are the most germanic
that's like having the most aids, why would you ever want that?
>>70870675
I never said I wanted this.
>>70870738
it is painfull
I wish I was something else than a pigskin, even being a nigger is preferable to this
>>70870558
>Germany are the most germanic
????
>>70872362
>>70870234
so celtic?
>>70872362
>Poles are illiterate
I specifically specified "northern (northwestern) germany"
>>70872418
???????????????
>>70869821
the average person wouldn't
>>70872362
Western and Southern Germany belong to France
Eastern Germany to Poland
Central and Northern Germany to the Denmark
>The Roman use of the term "Germanic" was not necessarily based upon language, but rather referred to the tribal groups and alliances that lived in the regions of modern-day Luxembourg, Belgium, the Netherlands, and Germany
>Gaul (Latin: Gallia) was a region of Western Europe during the Iron Age that was inhabited by Celtic tribes, encompassing present day France, Luxembourg, Belgium
I'm getting conflicting messages here
>>70872545
Everything north of Hamburg belongs to Denmark
Everything to the east of Hamburg is dutch though.
>>70872362
>>70872387
>>70872464
Reminder: R1a has been found in Germany thousands of years before proto slavs even existed :^)
Reminder that the autosomal make up of these people more closely matched modern germans than poles
http://www.pnas.org/content/105/47/18226.abstract
http://dirkschweitzer.net/LichtensteinCaveAnalysis0804DS.pdf
>>70872418
Sweden and Norway have the highest over all amount of I1 though. Surprisingly, Norway is more Slavic than we are.
>>70873051
it is because of german rape babies from occupation in ww2, the germans brought with them slavic genes
>>70872394
Celto-Germanic
>>70870794
> tfw mostly white, but slightly gypsy so I get to tan
Feels good man. I'm not even oppressed when I get back to Norway slightly brown looking.
>>70872750
>tfw Finnic R1a man
>>70869821
Most English people probably still think that the Anglo-Saxons/Jutes totally wiped out the native Britons, when really they intersexed with them and both absorbed each other.
>>70872750
>R1B
>Italic
>Germanic
Pick one
It is purely Celt
R1B in Italy is only in Northern Italy aka Gallia Cisalpina meanwhile the Italic homeland have very little, R1B
>>70873678
So, Celts weren't such cucks after all? If their lineages still dominate in Western Europe, that is.
>>70873743
""""Celtic"""" is a meme umbrella term but unfortunately it has to be used.
>There was no single 'Celtic' genetic group. In fact the Celtic parts of the UK (Scotland, Northern Ireland, Wales and Cornwall) are among the most different from each other genetically. For example, the Cornish are much more similar genetically to other English groups than they are to the Welsh or the Scots.
>There are separate genetic groups in Cornwall and Devon, with a division almost exactly along the modern county boundary.
>The majority of eastern, central and southern England is made up of a single, relatively homogeneous, genetic group with a significant DNA contribution from Anglo-Saxon migrations (10-40% of total ancestry). This settles a historical controversy in showing that the Anglo-Saxons intermarried with, rather than replaced, the existing populations.
>The population in Orkney emerged as the most genetically distinct, with 25% of DNA coming from Norwegian ancestors. This shows clearly that the Norse Viking invasion (9th century) did not simply replace the indigenous Orkney population.
>The Welsh appear more similar to the earliest settlers of Britain after the last ice age than do other people in the UK.
http://www.ox.ac.uk/news/2015-03-19-who-do-you-think-you-really-are-genetic-map-british-isles
>>70873678
>r1b is purely celtic
Not at all you simpleton. It's a west indo european subclade that stretches across multiple ethnicities including germans. R1b was already all across europe before celts appeared in 500bc
>>70872387
that is why Eastern Germans are so violent and racist?
>>70873892
western Germans are more racist t b h, they are just cowards who won't say it to your face.
>>70873833
Use your brain pierre
>>70873892
It's a germanic subclade
Also Poles got DEUTSCHED, their women loved the BIG DUETCHES DICK. This doesnt even include neolthic or southern y dna from germanics btw
>>70873872
>France is only 60%
Shit map tbqh
>germans
Germanized Celts*
>Celts
>500bc
Pick one
>>70873976
So Munich is less Germanic than Scotland, interesting
>>70873989
>France is only 60%
>Shit map tbqh
Dude do you have a brain deficiency? You are looking at one sample that itself is only looking at specific regions, also that's not the point all I dont care how much R1b france has
>Germanized Celts*
See>>70873925
Celts are just a few of the many groups included in R1b
>>70874062
Well the map doesnt include italo-celto-germanic subclades or y-dna subclades that were bought from farmers in neolithic times
>>70873925
Use yours, Marc
The R1B haologroup is the most present among the :
Irish(Celts) 80-90%
Welsh(Celts) 90-100%
Bretons(Celts) 70-80%
Catalans(Celts) 80-90%
Northern Italians(Celts) 70-80%
French(Celts) 60-90%
>>70874154
Ahahaha, you're exactly as I said before, a simpleton. I don't understand how people can be so uninformed like you and believe history doesnt exist before 500BC?
Read this article if you want a preliminary understanding of R1b, it's associated with a numerous amount of cultures, not just the celts.
http://www.eupedia.com/europe/Haplogroup_R1b_Y-DNA.shtml
Here's the first paragraph as an excerpt so you can understand how old it really is and predates celts by tens of thousands of years literally
>Haplogroup R* originated in North Asia just before the Last Glacial Maximum (26,500-19,000 years ago). This haplogroup has been identified in the remains of a 24,000 year-old boy from the Altai region, in south-central Siberia (Raghavan et al. 2013). This individual belonged to a tribe of mammoth hunters that may have roamed across Siberia and parts of Europe during the Paleolithic. Autosomally this Paleolithic population appears to have contributed mostly to the ancestry of modern Europeans and South Asians, the two regions where haplogroup R also happens to be the most common nowadays (R1b in Western Europe, R1a in Eastern Europe, Central and South Asia, and R2 in South Asia).
>>70873976
Meme map, R1a-Z284 is literally Norse and not found that deep into mainland Germany. L664 and M458 (Slavic) maybe, but that's it.
>>70874154
the common thing is "far-end of Europe (i.e a cul-de-sac)", not "Celtic"
a western Indo-European continuum that was R1b-heavy, some of which developed into Celtic and locally re-expanded (Western Europe had non-Celtic Indo-European languages too that are less well or not attested at all)
frankly, we aren't even completely sure when some of those specific subclades became so predominant. Y-DNA is very unstable in frequency too, unlike mtDNA. it's possible that some r1b replaced some other r1b in one location etc
>>70874318
>Haplogroup R*
>Not R1B
>Implying European R1B isn't linked to Bronze Age Invaders aka Celts
>>70874408
>Western Europe had non-Celtic Indo-European languages too that are less well or not attested at all)
Germanic is just Celtic spoken by I1 carriers and Italic is just Celtic spoken by E3B and J2 carriers
>>70874318
Apparently ancient mesolithic Latvians carried mostly R1b(rare subclade now)
http://www.cell.com/current-biology/fulltext/S0960-9822(16)31542-1
>Further, the Y chromosomes of two of our Latvian Mesolithic samples were assigned to haplogroup R1b (the maximum-likelihood sub-haplogroup is R1b1b), which is the most common haplogroup found in modern Western Europeans [36]. This haplogroup has been found at low frequencies before the Late Neolithic in Western Europe [1, 35] but at higher frequencies in Russia and is suggested to have spread into Europe from the East after 5,000 cal BP [1]. The presence of this haplogroup in Mesolithic Latvia points to a more westward ancestral range.
However...they were also shitskins.
>We also found tentative evidence for progressive skin depigmentation in Latvia based on mutations in the SLC24A5 and SLC45A2 genes (rs1426654 and rs16891982, respectively;
So good job R1b boys, your uncles were shitskinned cucks from Latvia who got replaced by superior R1a and N1c men.
There may very well have been some R1b cucks in Finland too but they sure as hell weren't allowed to pass on their lines since they are absent in modern day Finland.
>>70874432
it isn't linked solely to Celts but various Indo-European groups. r1b has been found even before the steppe invasions in the Eastern Baltic and Italy but those likely didn't lead to the modern European subclades. the high percentages there are due to founder effects and the like
>>70874537
ok, I hadn't realized you were just trolling. but yes it's possible that they were part of a continuum at first, especially Italic and Celtic
>>70874630
>it isn't linked solely to Celts but various Indo-European groups. r1b has been found even before the steppe invasions in the Eastern Baltic and Italy but those likely didn't lead to the modern European subclades. the high percentages there are due to founder effects and the like
You're in denial R1B is purely Celts, as for the so called Germanic they are orignally I1 Carriers who got CELTED, if you don't believe me check the Cimbrians, Teutons, Sicambri, and so on.
They all spoke Celtic and had Celtic names.
The Modern Germanics are arre a mix of Germanized Celts(R1b), Germanized Slavs(R1A), and Genuine Germanics(I1)
. speak a Celtic languages
>>70870234
>frogs are subhumans
Coming from the Anglo whose language has been eternally cucked by the frog
>>70874625
>R1B cucks
I KEKS were the original inhabitants of Europe but we
genocided them so much that they now exist scarcely in Western Europe and Eastern Europe
And we raped them so much that even in their own HOMELAND there is 40% of R1B CELTIC MASTER RACE
>>70874862
>Based Chink enlightening the anglos about their inferior condition
Have a (You)
>>70874625
feels grand man
t. >>70873609
dont talk about dad like that