>China's economy will crash any day no---

>>70593953

China's economy is a bubble with fake numbers that will eventually burst.

>>70593953
Economic experts has been predicting a crash for 20+ years now Zhang. If you don't think it's going to crash than you know nothing about economics.

>>70594003
>eventually

>>70594231
Hmmmm

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/theroyalfamily/3386353/The-Queen-asks-why-no-one-saw-the-credit-crunch-coming.html

>>70594231
https://www.google.es/amp/s/amp.ft.com/content/50007754-ca35-11dd-93e5-000077b07658?client=safari

>November 25th, 2008
>The economic forecasters’ failing vision

>>70594736
>>70594870
I get it, you're a shill

China's economy will crash in 2017-2018, I guarantee it

>>70594909
>I guarantee it

https://www.google.es/amp/s/www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/united-states/2013-10-15/never-saw-it-coming%3Famp?client=safari
Never Saw It Coming
Why the Financial Crisis Took Economists By Surprise

By Alan Greenspan

>>70594909
this guy is a shill. he made the same thread not so long ago.

heres the same counter argument of it i posted then

https://www.theguardian.com/business/2017/jan/20/chinese-economic-growth-dips-to-67-the-slowest-for-26-years

>>70594909
I screenshotted your post and will post it in Jan 2018.
>The financial crisis that ensued represented an existential crisis for economic forecasting. The conventional method of predicting macroeconomic developments -- econometric modeling, the roots of which lie in the work of John Maynard Keynes -- had failed when it was needed most, much to the chagrin of economists. In the run-up to the crisis, the Federal Reserve Board’s sophisticated forecasting system did not foresee the major risks to the global economy. Nor did the model developed by the International Monetary Fund, which concluded as late as the spring of 2007 that “global economic risks [had] declined” since September 2006 and that “the overall U.S. economy is holding up well . . . [and] the signs elsewhere are very encouraging.” On September 12, 2008, just three days before the crisis began, J.P. Morgan, arguably the United States’ premier financial institution, projected that the U.S. GDP growth rate would accelerate during the first half of 2009. The pre-crisis view of most professional analysts and forecasters was perhaps best summed up in December 2006 by The Economist: “Market capitalism, the engine that runs most of the world economy, seems to be doing its job well.”

>>70594231
the same experts that forecasted a Hillary victory?

>>70595070
Are you implying that percentage growth matters more than absolute growth?

Is posting facts that hurt your feelings, shilling?

All I can say is, the status China itself is reporting is no worth to trust at all

>>70595194
whats the "absolute growth", zhang

>>70595166
Different people. Those (((MSM))) experts wanted Shillary to win so that's what they forcasted.

>>70595203
As for Japan?

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-12-06/japan-s-economy-is-about-to-grow-by-175-billion-on-paper

>>70594566

BLA BLA BLA

it's all fake and full of finantial makeup

http://www.businessinsider.com/theres-a-dead-giveaway-that-chinas-growth-numbers-are-fake-2015-7

File: 1457227168347.jpg (116KB, 400x452px) Image search: [Google]

116KB, 400x452px

>t-the chinese century will start any day now guyz! I-i swear! We'll be free of American imperialism and gracious china will treat us much better!

>>70595260
$823 billion in 2016>>70593953

China's 6.7% growth in 2016 added twice as much GDP as it's 14% growth in 2007.

>>70595262
You seem to like cherrypicking, /pol/

>hes saved these links

totally shilling

>>70595405

>he believes them

totally shilling

>>70595262
Why wouldn't be there shills for a Chinese bubble burst like there were for Hillary? You could win shitloads of money with both events. Point is, forecasts aren't pinpoint accurate, economists aren't oracles.

>>70595332
>business insider

I'll one up you
http://www.frbsf.org/economic-research/files/wp2015-12.pdf
>In general, China's GDP figures are an accurate representation of it's economic power. The quarterly variation is smoothed, but the final real figure is effectively mirrored by our alternate models.

>>70595333
Who are you quoting? Xi Jinping literally just stated that China needs the United States.

>>70595405
>saved
I have something called google. Notice the google.es links?

>>70595426
>federal reserve economic studies are lies

>>70595443
/pol/tards get triggered by China following the exact same development path of its East Asian neighbors

Denying reality soothes their egos

>>70593953
Please, adding more bucks to your country than the Indos is like being able to out-read the dyslexic cunt

File: Debt-to-GDP-ratio-a366[1].png (86KB, 1600x1081px) Image search: [Google]

86KB, 1600x1081px

It's a bubb-

>>70595723
Might want to read the picture again

>>70595723
Que cotre

OP's pic says
"China adds Indonesia's GDP in 2016"

>>70595723
>khan education

>>70595723
>guiri literacy

>>70594231
you mean ameritard "experts" that are increasingly nervous about chinkland

>>70595543

>federal reserve economic studies are lies

he thinks they are bullet proof

https://www.cato.org/policy-report/novemberdecember-2012/has-fed-been-failure

File: 1459805192029.jpg (9KB, 225x225px) Image search: [Google]

9KB, 225x225px

China can't keep winning

>>70596253
>can't
why not?

>>70596132
>Cato
Let me call Reddit!

>>70595891
>two hundred and million allahu akhbars
>economy just stronger than seventeen million drug addicts and mad artists
>a lot

>>70598723
It was the largest absolute annual growth in GDP in world history

>>70598723
Read again

>>70599119
Not what we're discussing. Indonesia's economy is nothing to boast about.

>>70595443
No, Bankers WANT China to succeed so they can lend more money.

Economists who aren't paid off are all saying China is going to collapse

>>70598723
I see you're trying to use memes as a serious argument.

Unfortunately, the real world doesn't work on memes unless it's an american election.

>>70599194
¿? You are acting like adding the GDP of a nation of 260 million in one year is pathetic.

China's absolute GDP growth in 2016 was the largest annual growth ever. Ever.

Mátete

>>70599659
Thank you for bumping my thread

Sadly, you are /pol/ and spouting memes so I'm done talking with you.

In 2011-2012, China's GDP growth fell to 8%, I remember hundreds of anons here on /int/ claiming it was a bubble/would collapse in a few years.

Well it's been 6.

Most expert economists, including the IMF/World Bank/Goldman Sachs, are predicting 6.4% growth this year.