If Lithuanians are the whitest, why is their average IQ only

Russians and communism, as always.

All the smart people moved away or were killed in post-commie countries, hence why they're so poor and stupid nowadays

>>70540046
This actually makes sense desu

If Slavs weren't stupid, they would be western tier already.

Or actually, they would be better than the west, since they don't have any immigrants.

>>70540194
So what you're saying is that intelligence is environmental?

>>70540296
Partially yes, but genes are the most important and slavs just don't have it.

>muh white mustard race

File: 1428219537606-4.jpg (10KB, 255x254px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 255x254px

>>70539467
Why are americans so obsessed with race? Individual and cultural differences have way bigger impact on behaviour and intelligence than a tiny difference of genetic admixtures.

File: why are we still here.jpg (75KB, 305x409px) Image search: [Google]

75KB, 305x409px

>>70540046
>we will never get back our people

>>70544656
>why are americans so obsessed with race

insecurity

>>70540194
> they don't have any immigrants.
not true
too much Asians and Muslims here

>>70544656
No.

>>70545703
Then are you admiting that every person that is more white than you is also smarter than you? Since you claim that genetic differences are bigger than individual ones, then you must see for example every French as smarter than you.

>>70544656
Because we have all of them over here in a big shitfest.

>>70545954
Yeah, you're pretty multicultural, but what is the reason of arguing which european nation has the biggest admixture of a haplogroup you arbitarily deem "white"? Does it really matter so?

>>70545897
> French
> White

To answer your question: yes.

>>70540507
Why do you rely on slavs to do your space strolls then?

>>70546080
Well if you admit that, let me, a whiter, thus according to you - automatically smarter person than you tell you: you are in the wrong.

>>70545672
Russia has mudslimes?

>>70547430
10% of its population

>>70539467
>the same thread all the fucking time
do you expect new answers or something?

>>70539467
Lithuanians are slavs, not white. They were part of the USSR.

>>70546410
But if I'm in the wrong then you are not automatically smarter.

>>70539467
list is not even complete, there's no data from estonians for example.

>>70548203
Exactly. Which further proves my point.

>>70548215
Estonians are together with Latvians in Baltic Various

>>70546410
>>70548203
Let me explain what I mean better:
If we have a white guy and a nigger with the same education and way of living, the white one has higher chances to be smarter. If you (a white guy) was bornt in Detroit and lived your life with other niggers then you are smarter than them even if you had the same education and life.

File: iq yurop.jpg (348KB, 1260x1260px) Image search: [Google]

348KB, 1260x1260px

What about the Irish and Portuguese?

They're white too

>>70548366
Yes, I never argued that. I said that individual and cultural differences are way bigger than genetical ones, not that genetical differences don't exist.
All I'm saying is that asking why Lithuanians aren't the smartest just because they have a tiny bit more "atlantic-baltic" admixture than other nations is just stupid - becuase it just doesn't matter nearly as much as americans seem to think.

>>70539467
Lithuanians aren't the whitest and that image doesn't quantify "whiteness" correctly

>>70548799
Then we were saying the same thing just we didn't understand each other. GOD BLESS YOU MY POLISH FRIEND

>>70549045
Well what does if not autosomal admixture?

Certainly not haplogroups, that's for sure

>>70550510
It depends who is classified as the whitest. If, say, the Swedish are considered the whitest, then autosomal closeness to Swedes determines whiteness. For example, I'm sure everyone agrees that the Dutch are whiter than Finns, but according to that image the Dutch are considerably "near eastern" and even Finns are whiter than them by quite a few places. In reality, whatever mix of "atlantic-baltic", "near-east", "far-east" and "africa" the Dutch are is closer to being "white" than the Finnish mix.

>>70550848
Well I agree, far-eastern is a lot more "exotic" than near eastern, but it's up to ones opinion and biases who you consider to be the whitest, and considering the low neart eastern AND far eastern admixture in Lithuanians, I think they qualify as the whitest

>>70548215
>>70548343
This, Estonians fall under the same cluster as Balts due to centuries of racemixing.

File: hair and eye color.png (1MB, 1217x1434px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1217x1434px

Lithuanians are not the "whitest" though

>>70547430
Most in Europe yes

>>70549045
Who is the whitest according to you?

>>70552107
Anglos

File: 1421258136307.jpg (219KB, 1908x1073px) Image search: [Google]

219KB, 1908x1073px

>>70548402
>retardtugal

>>70552107
Northwestern Europeans generally, I don't really think it's worth deciding which specific country is the "whitest" when such a concept barely exists anyway

>>70548402
>Albania

desu

>>70539467
things are really bad in the countryside

>>70551262
he said whitet not most blond and blue eyed

>>70554970
those two kinda correlate imho