>His country isn't a constitutional monarchy
I don't think anyone really knows what the fuck your country is any more.
>>70394465
B-but your king is retarded, an alcoholic, and does only weird stuff.
It is
>His country isn't even a "Full Democracy" anymore
http://www.cnbc.com/2017/01/25/us-is-no-longer-a-full-democracy-eiu-warns.html
>>70394575
At least our king is based
>>70394628
So how come germans love him?
>>70394628
Stay jealous, kraut
>several countries in Africa has sub national monarchs, because the borders were drawn by Europeans but some of them let monarchs retain their status during colonialism
Sweden has a king?
What does he do?
>>70394757
Mostly blame the Brits for that one.
>>70394762
The same as all other constitutional monarchs. Basically nothing other than eating some fancy dinners, appearing at some award ceremonies, and other celebrity stuff.
We keep him around because the money we get from tourism related to the royal family makes more money than they cost.
>>70394762
Hunts moose
>>70394465
>his king is a corrupt cuck and so is his pm
>>70394703
I guess two thirds of Germans love idiots because they are idiots themselves. They believe everything the mass media tells them. They voted for Hitler, and even Merkel. Whatever a German thinks is good must be bad.
>>70394905
>Corrupt
Maybe of he had any power
>Cuck
He mistakingly once said he's happy Sweden doesn't take all of the refugees or something similar. Not that cucked thing to say desu
>>70394847
>We keep him around because the money we get from tourism related to the royal family makes more money than they cost.
It's only when foreign TV stations buy transmission rights for your Disney-style weddings that your royals generate a little money.
It is though
>>70395021
It's a complete fucking non-issue. Even if they didn't make money the amount they cost is virtually negligible compared to the rest of the state budget. There are PLENTY of other things to cut, before getting rid of the completely harmless version of monarchy we got.
>>70395021
Not him, but i hope we forever keep the monarchy. Too many people want to strip Sweden from Its culture and it would be a Huge success for them if the monarchy was abolished.
>>70394465
>have any monarchy
Step aside for the best Monarch
>>70395119
>>70395124
cucks
>>70395154
I'm republican but ok
>>70395152
excellent post
>>70395154
I'm a cuck for not wanting SJW:s to strip Sweden of all of Its culture? Retard
>>70394644
The US was never a full democracy. We're a democratic republic.
>>70395235
Did you know SJWs are also against theft? Are you pro theft now?
If I tell you they need oxygen to survive will you hold your breath until your retarded ass dies?
>>70395262
You are right, but that's not what full democracy means in that context.
>>70395154
>man är hanrej om man vill bli av med sin kultur
Bokstavligen häng dig själv mohammed och åk tillbaka till vilket skitland du nu kom ifrån. Om du inte gillar att ha en svensk kung kanske du skulle uppskatta en somalisk kung som tar in hela din familj som slavar.
>>70395326
Om man INTE vill bli av med sin kultur till och med.
>>70395305
Avsluta digsjälv din jävla Alban
>>70395372
hehe mm kom tillbaka när du fyllt 18 kalle
>>70395326
>>70395372
bokstavligen inga argument. Är monarkister alltid såhär efterblivna?
>>70395154
buzzword
>>70395185
faggot
>>70395235
muh sjw boogeyman
>>70395305
retard
>>70395326
sverigetråden plebbitor
>>70395425
kys
>>70394465
Soon you'll be a caliphate.
>>70395462
>when americans start posting canada tier posts
>>70394465
King of Sweden is constantly bullied by Swedish Parliament by making the King do unnecessary stupid shit and such. For example that time the parliement were mad at the King for visiting some country parliament disliked and they ended up bringing the king back like if he was a little kid.
>>70395152
does she even have a-level and a college degree?
>>70395522
The parliament is superior to the king in all but formal rank and it's their job to keep him in check.
>>70395764
I think it's stupid though if you are going to have a king , make it a proper one. Not a symbolic one that everyone else in country bullies.
>>70394654
You wont be saying that once our queen dies.
>>70395584
No, but she does have the providence and divine ordination of God Almighty.
Also, a great authority on Constitutional law and Anglican theology. Plus she trained as a mechanic during WWII
Our Queen is best Queen
>His country doesn't even require a minimum of bilingualism for it's political class
Vous sont les plebs ou quoi?
>>70395823
What monarch will you have then?
It's 2017
>>70395822
It's not bullying, it's just making sure he doesn't do stupid shit that isn't in line with the parliament, i.e. the will of the people. He already enjoys rights like not being prosecutable under the law.
>>70396035
>Current year
Compelling argument, icenigger
>>70395916
>his "canadian" queen is a german that lives in england
>>70396105
She is Queen of Canada. She is Canadian
>>70395764
In the Netherlands the King is actually part of our government. And can sack all the ministers, judges, mayors, the parliament and the senate.
>>70396061
A king must be the will of people , the force to carry the people to greater good , as Aristo says.
>>70396205
Does he need a reason to abolish the parliament or can he do it for the fun of it? For example Putin can abolish the Russian Parliament the second he desires and he doesn't even need a reason for it. It is what their Constitution says.
>>70395953
A special forces graduate who did the sirius patrol, runs marathons and shags a Tasmanian devil.
Also, his brother sucks.
>>70396371
Our King has more powers than in most European countries.
But the last time our monarchy abused them they got stripped of a lot of them.
We had one occasion in 19th century where the King constantly kept disbanding the parliament.
And as a response the parliament refused to agree with any government budget.
It almost led to a revolution, so our King had to give in.
>>70396630
And to answer your question: yes, he can do it for the fun of it.
my country shoudlnt exist
>>70396630
Your king needs to gather support so that he can get himself to be more powerful against the parliament. Democracy is a mistake and it only worked in Rome because democracy there was a minority democracy.
>>70396715
You're right. The USSR is what should exist
>>70396767
t. erdogan
>>70396767
New ottoman empire w authoritarian monarchy when?
>>70396700
No he can't. What are you smoking?
>>70396630
We actually had a similar thing a few years ago.
There had been elections. And the parliament quickly decided who they wanted as ministers.
But - normally it's procedure to ask the King for a person who will try to mediate between all parties and select suitable individuals for the role as minister.
The parliament had skipped that step entirely.
The result? The Queen at that time refused to swear in the new ministers. And told the parliament to look for some new ones.
Our parliament had to find new ministers. But afterwards the parliament changed the law so that ministers can be picked without the help of some guy appointed by the King.
>>70394465
>His country is a neutered constitutional monarchy
Charles XII was the last king of Sweden
>>70396843
Erdoğan is a fool , he believes in a democracy where he would have the majority but you can never control the minds of filthy peasants. An election among the high , noble and intellectual class shall be made to elect the King , for sure they are the ones that could elect such a man to carry the people to greater good.
>>70396850
Not an authoritarian monarcy , the title of King shall not pass by blood but the common decision of the classes I have mentioned. An assembly shall still remain , just like the Roman Senate.
>>70396943
It's all done by royal decree. If one minister agrees he can do whatever he wants.
And technically ministers aren't allowed to disagree with him once he has stated something in public.
>>70397071
The roman senate didn't elect kings
>>70397071
>noble and intellectual class
>greater good
>>70395152
Grandma <3
>>70397120
They actually did elect the Rex during the Roman kingdom era but that wasn't what I was meaning to tell. Senate will be there to balance so that monarcy would not lead to tyranny.
>>70396957
The only reason that raving lunatic is popular is because he also happened to [probably] be a genius. He did some impressive stuff but all in all he fucked Sweden to the point of no recovery.
>>70394778
They also set up all the Arab monarchies as well
>>70397108
Plus the ministers are appointed by him.
According to former prime ministers the former Queen had favorites and persons she didn't like. And they always took that into account when forming a government.
>>70397279
personally prefer the big boys of Wasa.
Swedish monarchy ended in 1523.
What you have now is the remnant of a rebellious military commander.
>>70398916
>be denmark
>virtually own all of scandinavia
>be dicks and randomly murder people
>gets BTFO up until the 1800s by the uprising caused by itself
Why the fuck isn't Scandinavia a country lol
>>70399295
I blame the Danish.
>>70399295
Swedes couldnt handle the bants
>>70399213
Gustav and co. would rather have Denmark rule over Sweden than arabs.
>>70399295
Because Denmark are murdering turncoats.
>>70399406
You get no disagreement from me. I'm Scanian and I would much rather be ruled from Copenhagen than Cuckholm.
>>70394465
>>70395152
>>70395462