In the event of the fall of society and the apocalyptic scen

File: 1466177746665.jpg (134KB, 680x650px)

134KB, 680x650px

>>70271313

>>70271313
What a retarded idea. Would be much better to survive in the south

>>70271313
>few/no large predators
>but enough game to easily hunt and survive
>low population density to avoid conflict with other humans
Ideal would be some lone island with large wildlife, but no predators. Realistically, you'd probably have to settle for something like Scandinavia or perhaps Russia and North America, but I don't know enough about bears to be sure that they won't be a problem there (They should usually leave humans alone, right?).
Perhaps central Asia is also an option, but I don't know about wildlife there.

File: Stalker Equip.jpg (146KB, 680x650px) Image search: [Google]

146KB, 680x650px

>>70272351
And because of that everyone would be there. The enemy is not nature, is other humans.

Other good places: Pripyat, Ukraine. Safest place on earth.
The Amazon jungle.

>>70272435
>The enemy is not nature, is other humans.

That's just wrong. Disease, hunger, cold would be much larger threats. As long as you're a decent sized group with some firearms noone will bother messing with you and you can trade with them

File: Civ_VI.jpg (133KB, 1360x768px) Image search: [Google]

133KB, 1360x768px

>>70272570
>post-apocalyptic scenario
>other humans not biggest thread
No wonder you Swedes love sandniggers so much. You don't even get what danger other humans pose in peacetime, yet alone apocalypse. I'm sure Ahmed and Mbongo will share their food, medicine and blankets with you when shit hits the fan.

>>70272757
You're obviously retarded, I would love for you and the brazilian to run around in the north in -40 degrees

Humans have always survived better and have built civilization through tribes where the climate is at least mild

>>70272570
Lol, "trade with them".
It's never enough for any group, they would want better things, more supplies, it's called expansionism. Once a single group decides to go that route they'd go assimilating smaller groups into it, getting bigger, and once they were bigger than your group they'd give you two options, join and stand by their rules or be killed, raped and pillaged.
It has happened literally through the entire course of human history, and you think without order and society -the best scenario to brew savagery and conquest- that wouldn't happen? You're very naive.

>>70273035
You're the one who is naive who think you would survive better in the north rather than the south. I literally have the entire human history on my side that shows despite violence people did survive better in milder climates

>>70273204
Yeah, "people" did. That doesn't mean you'd be included. Most of those "people" died in horrific ways, so your logic is to gamble the lottery of not being torn to pieces by other tribes, cause living in the cold is unpleasant.

>>70273204
>people survived better in milder climates
You are still not aware that we're talking about individual survival and not about a "the more the better" scenario for the human race. Sure, as a numbers game temperate regions will host more survivors, but there'll be much more violence leading to a much higher chance for the individual to die. If you're happy that others will continue the human race after they have killed you, took your stuff and raped your women, then fine, go south.

>>70271313
>In the event of the fall of society and the apocalyptic scenario, to what country would you try to go for survival, and why?

Somewhere mountainous

Maybe Georgia? classic bandit country

>>70273320
And more people obviously died in the north since there has never been a thriving civilization there

>cause living in the cold is unpleasant.
You obviously have no idea what you're talking about. You wouldn't survive one winter.

It's simple logic, there's no way you can't get it at this point

>>70273443
Individuals would die immediately. Those who survive and thrive would do so in groups where there's plenty of resources

Are you imagining yourself surviving in the Scandi wasteland by yourself?

File: shitkit.jpg (157KB, 680x650px) Image search: [Google]

157KB, 680x650px

>>70271313
Rate my gear

>>70273688
you'd get picked off at long range

>>70273636
First of all, I obviously would try to be in a small group of people I can trust. Second, survival on your own is not as nice, but possible, given the right gear. If you have some cabin as a base of operation it would be even easier.

Sorry, you'd be surprised in the instinct to survive that most people still have, even if it often doesn't seem so nowadays.

>>70273688
What do you need the smartphone for? Also, I'm not sure a shotgun is the best choice. I'd go for a .22lr.

You guys are fags lmao

File: 8UXt0S6.jpg (765KB, 1504x2964px)

765KB, 1504x2964px

>>70274017
Your chances are still lowered a huge amount when you're alone. Humans thrive with each other and being able to trade with other groups

Even in a Bosnian city in one year people froze and starved to death

File: result.jpg (170KB, 680x650px) Image search: [Google]

170KB, 680x650px

Forgot something for chopping down trees

Gear is made for Canadian rocky mountain forest wilderness

>>70273688
>smartphone
>wallet
>gun cleaning kit
>28 shots
>3 bottles
you wouldnt even last 2 weeks

>>70273636
It's not impossible to survive even in the artic if you have a good base and supplies to begin with. Keep it a small group and separate yourselves from the rest of the soon-to-be-forming groups.
There would be many generations before a heavy settled area went into any remote peace, in our lifetimes there would just be war and murder. And you'd be included in it.

>>70273688
A sawed off would be good in dense woods and if we were talking zombies and shit. Otherwise you'd be picked off by rifles.

>>70274294
Like I already said you have no idea what you're talking about. You're arguing against human history

>>70274113
lemme guess, you'd just go to WalMart.
>>70274152
>Even in a Bosnian city
Your pic just proves what I and Brazil are saying. Stay the fuck away from populated areas. You act as freezing is inevitable. How do you think our ancestors survived? It's possible, I never claimed it's easy. And for individual survival, you definitely will prefer going to a unpopulated cold than a densely populated warm area.

And again, I'd never say I'd aim for going alone, small group of people you can trust is ideal, but if necessary, you could also survive alone witth the right gear.

File: me.jpg (160KB, 680x650px) Image search: [Google]

160KB, 680x650px

Tried to be as realistic as possible if a Armageddon happens one day.

>>70272435
>The Amazon jungle.
you'd die there in a week

>>70274411
Your argument is not based on survival, nothing you have said is relevant to individual survival (which also applies to a small group).
You'd be one of the many bodies that a civilization built itself upon, good for you. I'd try to live a somewhat decent life for a while. If my group produced children, then maybe in two generations they could go for the south and join an already established commune. My genes would be intact because I isolated myself from the human conflict that would spawn from territorial wars, while you threw yourself head first into a hot pot of murder. You are now forgotten and your line eradicated.
I rest my case.

>>70274794

No no, YOU'D die there.

>>70274794
I've lived many a year in the jungle with natives, senpai.

>>70274819
I see now
>flag
then indeed it's your natural habitat so you'd thrive

>>70274998

lmao ure fucked.

>>70274805
You don't have a higher chance of surviving in the north. Stop being delusional.

File: rider.jpg (143KB, 680x650px)

143KB, 680x650px

>>70274017
>What do you need the smartphone for?
Music, games, pictures, maybe sat nav.

>I'd go for a .22lr.
Do you expect to kill human beings with that shit? At least i can fire slugs from my boomstick.

>>70274250
>not cleaning your gun regularly

Have another creation of mine. This one's supposed to be a bike/horse rider.

>>70275112
>What do you need the smartphone for?
>Music, games, pictures, maybe sat nav.
topkek

Shit, I didn't know you could stack items in the same slot.

Also why so few carrying flint and steel? That's like the best thing you could possibly have for survival anywhere.

>>70275110
Fuck, you're annoying, Sweden.

>>70275160
>I'm an internet tough guy i dont need recreation

Fuck off autist

>>70275246

It's true tho, you'd be heading to the most populated parts of the world.

Personally i'd just go to the countryside and hide there, maybe pantanal.

Also going futher south isn't a bad idea either.

File: innawoods.jpg (167KB, 680x650px)

167KB, 680x650px

Rate my innawoods for a mountainous/forested terrain

>>70275359
No, his argument is that you SHOULD go to the most populated places and seeking isolation is a bad idea.

>>70275359
He's talking about the furthest north of Norway/Sweden/Finland and how it would be easier to survive there than more south (which already is quite empty)

>>70275398
>disagreeing with going to one of the most inhospitable places on the planet means saying you should go to the most populated areas

that's just a strawman

>>70275398
>>70275403

I my opinion it silly getting further north, wasting time and resources.

Just go to the jungle in the countryside ffs, there's food there for you to live for the rest of your life. Fuck not even the natives will notice that the world is ended.

>world went to shit(finally)
>take all your shit and take some guns
>run to the countryside
>build your wood camp
>life of animals, fruits and whatever
>survive while the world kills themselves a la The Walking Dead

It ain't rocket science.

>>70275367
I'd at least take a full tang fixed blade knife.

>>70275465
You literally have said this, ya jabroni.
"Individuals would die immediately. Those who survive and thrive would do so in groups where there's plenty of resources"

Switch my geographical location to Canada, then. I stand by my point that snowy terrain would be much safer. And to avoid big groups.

>>70275367
Good idea to have a fishing set on you

>>70275722

Yep, that's why i said take some guns with you.

If you're gonna build a camp, don't build it on the ground, build up. Or you can do like the guy on the video, but for a non-specialist it would take a few weeks.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P73REgj-3UE

>>70275722
Yes, the jungle is the single hardest place to survive along with the desert. It's much much easier to survive on cold climate.

>>70275850
I'm skeptical, what good are my guns if I get bitten by some spider while shitting in the jungle? Or mauled by a Jaguar.

I like this >>70275863 Brazilian more.

>>70275945

Yes, there are risks of course. But you'd have WAY more resources than a cold climate, also you'd have to keep yourself warm at all times, and cold clothing alone won't help you at all.

File: result.jpg (178KB, 680x650px) Image search: [Google]

178KB, 680x650px

Belarus or Romania

File: 2017-01-22 15_39_36.png (636KB, 676x646px) Image search: [Google]

636KB, 676x646px

r8 my setup

File: 1474100740919.jpg (32KB, 520x381px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 520x381px

>>70276207

File: sve je u kurcu.jpg (158KB, 680x650px) Image search: [Google]

158KB, 680x650px

This is the stuff I'd probably manage to get in the first 5 minutes and leave the house with it. From there I'd head to the local fort that's about 15 minutes from my house to see if maybe more people gather there. I'd be fucked with no guns, but the closest that I know I could get them 100% is my father's or grandfather's house which are both at least a few hours walking distance. Other than that I think my region would be pretty good for an apocalypse setting, the fort is a pretty good location, but there are also many hills nearby where partisans hid during the war.

>>70276130
looks heavy
>>70276207
are these stones or potatoes?
more potatoes maybe?
>>70276126
my people know how to make fire

>>70276385
potatoes

>>70276385
I'm a big guy

>>70276385

Yes i know. For me doesn't worth it going to cold places to survive. I'd rather do like that guy on the video and stay comfy in my mud house :3

File: 1484773728805.jpg (336KB, 720x960px) Image search: [Google]

336KB, 720x960px

>>70276379
It's monday. Go buy a gun.
>>70276456
I take it you are just trying to kill other people for fun?

File: Wayne Rooney.png (259KB, 526x573px) Image search: [Google]

259KB, 526x573px

>>70276566
How else am I gonna get dosh?

>>70276566
Man I'm a poor student, can't afford that shit atm and I'm too lazy. Guess I'll just throw my axe at people.

File: Tropical Jungle.jpg (182KB, 680x650px) Image search: [Google]

182KB, 680x650px

Set for jungle. Consider the backpack and the vest as "base" stuff, not to be carried around on every trail.
Keeping the Mosin just because of how reliable it is and requiring low maintenance, and the Taurus Judge because having a handgun with 12 gauge is extremely versatile.

>>70276456
Isn't this a Killing Floor class?

>>70276969
Best one baby!

File: 2017-01-22 15_59_27.png (600KB, 678x650px) Image search: [Google]

600KB, 678x650px

I call it ambassador killer

File: vargg.jpg (225KB, 762x868px) Image search: [Google]

225KB, 762x868px

>>70271313
>ITT: Neckbeards fantasizing about a post apocalypse scenario where in reality if it actually happened, they would die after the fridge and cabinets were empty.

File: thermal ia2.jpg (75KB, 768x511px) Image search: [Google]

75KB, 768x511px

>>70277167

Jokes on you, i'm in the military.

Also roll.

>>70277167
rolling

>>70277167
>>70277296

I don't drink, lol

>>70277167
Joke's on you, I'm a professional shooter, lived in the Amazon and I know how to make several kinds of home-made grenades, pipe-bombs and gasoline bombs.
Just not great at bushcraft shit. I'm not good with knots.

>>70277167
I just shaved...

>>70276921

Why not a shotgun?

It's easier than the Taurus.

what the heck is innawoods

>>70277559

innawoods.net

>>70277599
I still don't get it

>>70277655

Just pick the things you want and put on it's designated areas.

>>70277167
Rolling

>>70277559
It's usually a /k/ thing to go to the woods and fuck some shit up

>>70277669
why though, what's the point?

>>70277740

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=27H4QQIbdRU

>>70277799
So it's literaly a dress up game?
k don't mind me have fun in your thread i won't bother you anymore we're adults here right? bye

File: TIP2.png (317KB, 600x750px) Image search: [Google]

317KB, 600x750px

>>70277893

k bye :D

*tips in your direction*

File: 1443320506708.png (29KB, 742x636px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 742x636px

>>70277740
It's just a little game, there is no point.
Can you work the concept of a game in your head?

>>70277167
meh, I have enough guns, ammo and food to hide out for months in my apartment as long the water is running. My first and foremost problem would be getting out of the city alive, especially since I live in a sandnigger populated area.

Somewhere similar to Italy