American ended World War II by nuking Japan. Was it the right

the war would have ended regardless, sorry to break it to you
the nuking was basically licking the chicken nugget so your brother wouldn't eat it

File: 1446453069197.jpg (233KB, 1113x1376px) Image search: [Google]

233KB, 1113x1376px

It was fucked up, but it was the lesser of two evils.
>Invade mainland Japan
>Country gets fucked up even worse, millions of more casualties on both sides
>Most likely Japan would have gotten split in half allah Germany

>>70175080
>allah Germany
I don't know if that was a pun or not.

Friendly reminder that it was the Soviet attack on Manchuria what triggered the Japanese surrender.
> conquer an area the size of Europe in 2 weeks
> make a million prisoners on the way
> nobody remembers this
Smh

I don't understand why they dropped the second one to Nagasaki.
One nuke was enough to show America's power to Russia.

>>70176387
You guys were stubborn and wouldn't give up. after the first one, that's why

File: 1484937188980.png (755KB, 1000x1006px) Image search: [Google]

755KB, 1000x1006px

>>70174898
Two nukes weren't enough.
Fuck America.

>America

I thought only the United States did it.

>>70174898
Hard to say if they deserved it, but those nukes sure did end the war, which is a good thing. Bombing Nagaskai was a mistake though.

>>70174898
Wrong. 2 weren't enough.

>>70176454
They were stubborn, so we decided to bomb the Christian center of Japan? Was there really no other, more militarily significant place to bomb? Great job USA!

>>70176617
Ok, well dropping the second one on Nagasaki was a literal mistake, and IIRC it was actually a munitions-laden city under the guise of an inconspicuous one.

File: e4b889e59bbde5908ce79b9f.jpg (134KB, 640x427px) Image search: [Google]

134KB, 640x427px

No, the tripartite pact nations were the good guys

>>70176454
>The first one was dropped on Aug 6.
>The second one was dropped on Aug 9.
>only 3 days allowance.
Japan were preparing to give up the war at that time.

>>70176891
they were given the time frame ahead of time
it passed

>>70174898
Wrong of course. obliterating hundreds of thousands of civilians, people just living their lives, is completely unjustifiable.

>>70177004
>they were given the time frame ahead of time
It didn't make sense, because Japan didn't know how nuke is until the first one was dropped. Japan realized what nuke is when the first one was dropped.

>>70177482
>Japan didn't know how nuke is until the first one was dropped
>"hmm no way those filthy gaijin can destroy us, empire of rising sun STRONK"
>"oh shittu it's actually happeningu"
Yea that's what we in the west call "trying your luck"
And it didn't turn out so good for you

>>70177004
t. James F. Byrnes

forget this matter already
what's passed is passed
no country admits their crimes during war time

I'll invent a time machine just so I can go back in time and make sure that at least 2 more are dropped

two nukes were not enough.

>>70179527
what's a point of your post?

>>70174898
Daily remember when the whites chimpout

I blame them jews.

>>70180159
How your explanation about Japan not surrendering was pointless
They took a risk by not surrendering right away, and then got nuked twice

Yes. Two nukes weren't enough.

>>70180506
I am just wondering the reason why America dropped the nuke twice when one nuke was enough to show their power. You misunderstand my point somehow.

>>70181802
The bombing campaing killed 250000-900000 before the nukes were dropped. They didn't surrender then. Then the first nuke was dropped. THEY STILL DID NOT SURRENDER. Then the second nuke was dropped. It was all your armys fault.

>>70181977
>Then the first nuke was dropped. THEY STILL DID NOT SURRENDER.
as I wrote in >>70176891, America dropped the second one only 3 days after the first one dropped. When Japan were preparing to surrender, America dropped the second one. It was too early.

File: 1484615257821.jpg (90KB, 900x900px) Image search: [Google]

90KB, 900x900px

It was the lesser of two evils.
If we didn't choose to nuke Japan then the Allies would be forced to do a brutal Land invasion of the islands.
Needless to say, the alternate would have been far worse than the 2 nukes.

>>70174898
> Was it the right or wrong thing to do?
Not on the town with full of civilian.
> Did they deserve it?
Drop on civilian people? That a coward tactic. Btw "The Operation Meetinghouse" with 80k civ casualties.

And remind everyone about "Internment of Japanese Americans" in 1942 when you next time hear "land of the free" in anthem.

>>70176891
Your grandparents attacked our grandparents, you don't get to decide what length of time they should've waited to drop another bomb

>"they shouldn't have dropped the bomb"
>"but invading them would have caused even more devastation"
>"then don't drop the bomb the bomb and don't invade, problem fixed"
fucking weebs I swear

File: 1483772382494.gif (488KB, 284x210px) Image search: [Google]

488KB, 284x210px

>>70182955
I meet a weeb who legitimately wanted a Japanese-controlled US and even said the US retaliating after Pearl Harbor was "uncalled for".

>>70182081
>When Japan were preparing to surrender
you mean preparing to literally give them a message that would take no time to send?