What is stopping Mexico from creating a nuke?

>>70050298
>Mexico doesnt have a public enemy to threat with the bomb
>Mexico making the bomb would make your country be infiltraded with (((freedom)))
>what is military budget

>>70050298

it's hard to make things like nuclear bombs when you are headless.

>>70050298
Ahem... no nukes for you, until we give you a few of ours...

>>70050376
1. We do now
2. It already is
3. What about it? North Korea and Pakistan could do it.

>>70050380
Not an argument

>>70050473
1) who is enemy
2) it WILL get worse
3) North Korea and Pakistan are more of a poor meme than being a country, do you want that to happen too?

>>70050298
To be honest every country should have nukes.

>>70050602
yes
every single one, but yours

>>70050298
can't wait until chicano spies give mexico nuclear secrets

>>70050557
Trump
It will get worse already thanks to ^
It will happen under Trump anyway

>>70050659
wouldn't mind, we're 'neutral'

As long as any cunt has nukes, every other should work to get them. Same with chemical weapons.

>>70050298
cartels would sell them for massive dosh

>>70050746
>dirty bomb by the cartels blows up the White House
The next four years are going to be spicy.

>>70050298
The USA "economic hit men" and the question that is: Why nukes?

>>70050750
>>70050753
i can see other nations fuck around with their powers and kill innocents/themselves
not even 3rd world countries but every country could fuck up really bad with these powers

>>70050298
You can't even make a functional country Juan.
Go cut my lawm.

>>70050890
>The USA "economic hit men"
What do you mean exactly? And why not?

>>70050915
I already know this

>>70050993
Not an argument

>>70050915
Good, let them fuck themselves up while discouraging interventionism

What foreign invader does Mexico even have to possibly worry about?

>>70051024
Los sicarios económicos. Investiga sobre esa mierda, hermano. Es el modo que usa estados unidos para desestabilizar un país hasta lograr lo que ellos quieren.

>>70051089
but what if the brits fuck you up?
how high of a possibility is that?

>>70051095 (You)

>>70051150
I'm gonna need a tl;dr version of that. Still will look into it, but later.

>>70051214
We have reserves

>>70051353
But we don't, which is the entire point.

>>70051214
What I mean is that they would make us change our opinion. It is inevitable, historically. And worse for the neighboring country. I think.

>>70051188
Why would they?

>>70051572
i dont know i thought you would know

>>70050298
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Treaty_on_the_Non-Proliferation_of_Nuclear_Weapons

>>70051214
I don't think the US would enact an actual invasion in Mexico.
The chicano population here is already more useful to you than a nuke would be.

>>70050298
Trump does not have Mexicans.
He hates Mexicans abandoning their country to come leach off the US illegally.
Get over it m8.

>>70051625
We're on good terms with the UK now. Would the netherlands nuke you out of the blue?

>>70050746
Getting nuked by Mexico would be absolutely the most meme death possible

>>70051722
Trump is scrapping it.

>>70051777
DUDE
WEED

>>70051777
its more likely than you being bombed by anyone
the chance that it will happen is smaller than /s4s/-users chances to get laid but not impossible

>>70051790
>le world police
And he'll back down. It benefits the US more than anyone else.

>>70051722
We could just ignore this.

>>70051440
They don't have a lot of leverage against us now that Trump is in power.

>>70051742
Or both.

>>70051754
Ok. Even then, what right does the US have to ignore our sovereignty?

>>70051997
No he's dumb enough to do it. When he talks about it you can tell he's genuine about it.

>>70052004
Solo investiga esa mierda cuando puedas, para que veas como se podría cambiar la decisión de un país.

>>70050298
Lack of science?

>>70052091
Later

>>70051214
Literally what makes you think the US would invade. If anything maybe drone strikes on cartels but you should welcome that. Either way, we wouldn't let you have nuclear weapon and there is nothing you could do if we did decide to invade :^)

>>70055209
What right does the US have to ignore our sovereignty?

>>70050298
>What's stopping Mexico from making a nuke

Your military budget, your economy, your weak infrastructure, treaties, alliances built around the prevention of nuclear war, the United States, and your less than competent scientists

>>70055347
Rights don't matter when we're stronger than you. You threaten world stability when you build nuclear arms in peace time, so actions will be taken. Probably just a slap on the hand and sanctions at first, but you would be aggressively put down if it were necessary and you know it

You should not, because USA has all the trumps.

>>70055481
>Your military budget
We can just increase it
>>70055481
>your economy
One of the biggests in the world, and it didn't stop Pakistan nor North Korea.
>treaties
Treaties don't matter anymore.
>your weak infrastructure
We already have Nuclear Power Plant
>alliances built around the prevention of nuclear war, the United States
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/dec/23/donald-trump-nuclear-weapons-arms-race
>and your less than competent scientists
We already have Nuclear Power Plant

>>70055543
>Probably just a slap on the hand and sanctions at first
Pfff, you are already doing that.
>but you would be aggressively put down if it were necessary and you know it
Like Fidel Castro?

>>70055667
We definitely should, fuck the Tlatelolco Agreement

>>70055920
>We can just increase it
Yeah because that's the best source of funding given you're losing a war with drug dealers

>You're already doing that
Don't compare a couple of tariffs to legitimate efforts to out you down

>Like with Fidel Castro
Except no other nuclear power would be on your side, least of all another superpower (partly because there isn't one)

Aside from that Trump is blowing smoke out his ass threatening those treaties, and would definitely be willing to flip flop should Mexico just so happen to start building a nuke during his presidency

Probably the biggest obstacle here is the fact that your government has no intention of building a nuke, isn't stupid enough to make such a blatant act of aggression, and the world is currently leaning towards a climate of nuclear disarmament.

You're essentially a child by pondering why, such obvious obliviousness to reality lol

mexican "intellectuals" will just make it out of tijuana firecracks and moldy tortillas

>>70056359
>losing a war with drug dealers
Can you tell me the casualty numbers of the war, please? And can you tell me, who are the Mexican drug lords and where they are?

>a couple of tariffs
When those tariffs WILL, not if, but will, cause a recession, it doesn't make much difference to me.

>Except no other nuclear power would be on your side
Why would we need them, we are your allies, unlike the Soviet Union and Cuba.

>Trump is blowing smoke out his ass threatening those treaties
I believe him when he says he doesn't give a fuck about Geneva Conventions, Paris Agreement, NAFTA, NTP. So why should we follow them again?

>You're essentially a child by pondering why
Not an argument

This is a good and informative thread
Bump

>>70050750
>Trump
I like how people honestly believe that he hates Mexico.
It's rhetoric Jorge. He played on a base that hated illegal immigration, and so he will end up doing the bare minimum to make it look like he did something. He will prop up a shitty cheap wall, and that will be the end of it.

>>70061358
>really high tariffs on Mexico's exports, scrap NAFTA, stop remittances entirely, economy uncertainty that will lead to a recession, devaluation of the peso with every fucking tweet etc.
>just rhetoric

i think mexico having nukes is a good idea. it is one of Latin Americas largest economies and is the 10th largest nation on earth in terms of population.

and it has every right to defend itself from foreign invasion. especially when it's neighbor has the largest, most powerful, and expensive army in history,

go for it.

Treaties