>Polish language
https://youtu.be/F4fONvkOA1w
fucking disgusting who let these "people" exist
If I had a nuke for every country in the world I'd nuke Poland 196 times.
Sorbian and czech are even worse 2bh
>>69903252
fuck off, soriban is glorius
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2uBaJIoMvdk
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fj7lk2q5xJ0
>>69903252
>Sorbian
never heard of them
>>69902751
;)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=72kZw26IQa0
>>69902751
>His language hasn't got a verb for "to have". He needs to express possesion by possition of an owner. His language isn't even phonetic.
Russian is more mongolian tier than finnish. Kek
>by possition of an owner.
Do you mean 'y мeня ecть'? What position are you talking about.
>>69905739
>y мeня
I'm pretty sure this is a possition. In polish y мeня ecть = u mnie jest. It informs about an existace of something in a place that we are currently talking, or its basic meaning means "at my place". I am pretty sure it works same way in russian, but somehow you use it to express possesion as well. And imat' instead of "to have" means "to fuck". I am always wondering if at communist era it was illegal to "say that you have got something" because there was no such thing as "private", so using "imat'" was kind of tabu, so it has became a swearing, just like sex was tabu in Poland so "jebat'" has became hardcore swearing instead of remaining as an "to copulate".
>>69905971
I can't judge Polish but imho in Russian " est' " and " imet' " are have an english counterpart of 'to have' and 'to own'
The usage of as a swearing came afaik from the gulag prisoners who couldn't satisfy their sexual needs.
>>69906422
are have -> have*
of -> of the word
>His language hasn't got a verb for "to have".
Имeть?
>>69906422
but "jest" is "is" in English. My point is that when you have got a computer, in russian you will say:
>U mjenja jest komputer
but in polish you will say:
>Mam komputer
u mnie jest komputer- would mean that i have got a computer at my place
>>69906527
Russians don't use it as much as they do the genitive consrruction above. We also have "imati" and it is used almost exclusively. But you're a Türk, you people literally do not have a verb "to be", and I believe "to have" is "var/yok" (exists/does not exist) in an obscure construction?
Really makes you think
I can respect having long strings of fucking convoluted tongue mangling syllables
At least it's not the verbal dogshit that is spoken english,
>TFW exposed to enough other languages to realize how ghastly English really is
>>69906691
>you people literally do not have a verb "to be"
"Olmaq" in azerbaijani, "olmak" in turkish. Tho it's rarely used alone.
>and I believe "to have" is "var/yok"
It is. We also don't have a word for "to possess".
>>69906809
Really doodles your noodles, my friend
>>69906558
I fucked up the post completely yes 'ecть' is 'to be'
and you're right about the form but the position is not implied as example 'y мeня ecть мaшинa' has no place.
>>69906927
Why to have it tho?
It's meaningless if you don't state what do you have or possess.
>>69902751
Objectively the best Slavic language next to Sorbian and Kashubian
>>69907517
>>69904151
Sorbian is fucking disgusting
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ph5MuSHtgS0
isn't sorbian just a germaized version of polish?
>>69907872
No, sorbian in its current form exist scince the Migration period.
Polish and german are both way younger.
The sorbian population is old, like really damn old, it was a thing when rome still existed
>ruskie
V?
>>69907872
She's speaking a Germanized version of Sorbian - very close to Polish.
>>69907992
>No, sorbian in its current form exist scince the Migration period.
She's not speaking pure Old Sorbian.