Why dont we just invade north Korea
>>69592171
Im listening...
>>69592171
Because they have nukes. Even if they don't, it's china's backyard
>>69592205
>>69592275
Pretty sure they haven't got nukes
>>69592171
Because they'll bombard south korean cities with artillery for a couple of hours until they get neutralised, killing a few ten thousand and knocking down skyscrapers which is enough to be a kind of deterrence.
More importantly south korea would not like to deal with modernising its vast population and land, which will drag down its economy for a while.
>>69592696
>world is eradicated of all gooks
I fail to see the downside
China says no
>>69592316
They don't have ICBMs, they do have nukes, I'm pretty sure Seoul is toast 15-20 minutes after any atempted invasion
>>69592171
Who will take care of all those North Koreans then? They are all starving now and then you would have the millions of soldiers now out of work.
>>69592812
Just build a wall to keep the nukes out
>>69593600
You can't solve all your problems with the wall, Donald
>>69593842
>>69592171
"We" already did.
10% of the north korean population was killed.
Imagine your country was just invaded by Japan, then 5 years later some pther country invaded, took half the country, and has missiles aimed at you for 70yrs.
How would your country turn out?
US turned fucking retarded after its "muh 3000".
>spend billions and lose 10s of thousands of american/ south korean lives taking best korea
>north in total anarchy
>millions flee to china and south
>??????
it would be a big, expensive mess.