Why can European countries get along with neighbor countries?

File: 499.png (90KB, 238x288px) Image search: [Google]

90KB, 238x288px

Well, there's a special kind of people that finds profit in warfare

What are you talking about nip? European countries have fought eachother countless times.

Just look at France vs. England & Sweden vs. Denmark

>>69331489
It seems like a smart thing to do after two extremely self-destructive wars, doesn't it?

I just hope it's going to last after the last generation that experienced WWII dies off. Peace is like air, you forget how valuable it is until you lose it.

>>69331622
We need to make Europe European again, and for that we need a war

>>69331561
Jews were always scapegoated after all wars, revolutions, epidemics, famines etc.

War was never in their interest. They profit from stability.

File: 1864.jpg (3MB, 2803x1623px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 2803x1623px

>>69331574
1 8 6 4

>>69331668
War will produce cripples, orphans and hunger. You're just a dumb little faggot.

>>69331726
>War was never in their interest

ok shut the fuck up

File: 1848_Dybboel_bjerg.jpg (20KB, 400x250px) Image search: [Google]

20KB, 400x250px

>>69331749
1 8 4 8

>>69331781
I don't know man, I would rather have that, than being replaced by inbreds

>>69331812
Du Pont family. Ethnically French, sympathised with Hitler, profited from the war and the Holocaust.

You shut up.

File: 3813111+_fa68e766e43a225a8b4616ee2752ab3e.png (29KB, 300x162px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 300x162px

We don't tho. It's just been surprisingly peaceful the last 70 years.

>>69331897
He's obviously an arab though
Antisemitism is 99% an arab thing
WHich is why jews and nazis should reconciliate against teh muslims T B H

>>69331489
They aren't disgusting Japanese ""people"", that's why

File: jews.jpg (52KB, 790x473px) Image search: [Google]

52KB, 790x473px

>>69331958
>Antisemitism is 99% an arab thing
I guess that's why they imported so much arabs here, so you can say this.
I'm not arab by the way.

>>69331489
Is that Barcelona?

File: düppel.jpg (96KB, 596x335px) Image search: [Google]

96KB, 596x335px

>>69331820
can't remember 1848

>>69331489
We dont want to do much war or anything because we are all to shaken after the two world wars and communism/cold war .
We still live in the shadow of the wars really, everybody is so afraid of another european war that nationalism is often repressed and everybody thinks there may be another hitler or something if we ever try and change

File: Tropper_1849.jpg (25KB, 300x221px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 300x221px

>>69332061
But I know you've seen this pictures lots of times

>>69331960
Thank you for your praise
Xenophobia is the secret of our county's safety.

>>69331489

Most European countries are prosperous enough to not have to have wars with their neighbors in order to live well, it also helps that self defense isn't a huge priority since many of these countries can rely on the US, France, and Britain for protection.

File: Barricades_-_1848_Germany.jpg (162KB, 1239x733px) Image search: [Google]

162KB, 1239x733px

>>69332061
Think some republicucks got what was coming to them

>>69332023
i never met a jew irl who wasn't very racist against arabs, explain that
maybe 20 years ago they were leftist but today ? they are mostly anti-muslim honestly

>>69331960
Happy new year Chinese Aussie

>>69331489
This >>69331574

The only reason why there hasn't been another major European war is because the US enforced the peace after WWII and basically helped micromanage the European recovery and united them under NATO with the purpose of keeping them united against the USSR. The EU is the most recent product of said development to create a stable, unified Europe and has had mixed results due to aforementioned rivalries among European cunts dying hard.

>>69332175
I wouldn't mind if they werent behind SOS racisme and such things
they spent 25 years fueling tensions in this country and now they act like they're the victims

they are despicable

>>69331489
They can't. That's why we had to come in and start policing them after WW2.

>>69332114
Wars in the 3rd world has replaced having wars in European cunts though. Big American and European arms manufacturers still need conflict, just not in their home countries.

>>69332280
No that was because we all ran out of money and needed someone to help keep the soviets away.
Britain then ran out of money further , then you sabotaged our empire and caused it to collapse so we basically gave up.

>>69332330
>No that was because we all ran out of money
That and because Colonialism is unprofitable 95% of the time, and is a poor system that only serves to benefit a few people while both the natives of the colony and home country lose out.

European countries can fight each other irl.
And they did, for hundreds of years, very evenly.
Japan just curbstomped all the scrubs around it.

>>69332185
The idea and attempts of creating a unified Europe are much more sooner than the Cold War and the American influence through NATO, for instance the EU is basically based on the principles of the Paneuropean Union which was created in 1923. But of course Napoleon, the National Socialist Germans, the Habsburgs, the Catholic Church in its way and many others have tried to unify Europe. There has been such a long lasting peace in Europe because the Europeans have suffered terribly with the last two world wars and understood the futility of it and comitted with the idea that something like shall not happen again.

>>69332454
>are much more sooner
>"much more older"

ffs

>>69332454
Yeah, but those ideas were based more on a unified European empire rather than mutual cooperation. The League of Nations was the first real attempt at this but failed in large part because the countries that founded it (US, France, UK) were hardly players in the actual organization.

>>69332500
It's true. Jews were against breakup of Austria-Hungary, Czechoslovakia before the WWII and after the fall of the Berlin Wall. Because each time they suffered in the name of national consolidation, the most severely during the fascist puppet regime ofc.

>>69332285
Sad stuff desu

>>69332407
No, we got a load of money from it
Mostly from India (lot of people, lot of taxes), malaya (dat rubber) and the random ones we somehow had around the straits like kuwait which had some oils.

Most of the african ones were semi-useless , there were resources but we didnt need to take care of a country to have them after we were in control of all the mines, In others we just liked living there so we should have kept at least parts of them because we all know what happened next.

File: 1396069182841.jpg (45KB, 330x319px) Image search: [Google]

45KB, 330x319px

>>69332407
>That and because Colonialism is unprofitable 95% of the time,
Shit Americans say

File: Rauugh.jpg (56KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]

56KB, 500x500px

>>69332407
>That and because Colonialism is unprofitable 95% of the time

>>69332607
>No, we got a load of money from it
British Industrialists did. Actual Brits got very little from the maintenance of such a large empire afaik. India was the only real colony that remained profitable throughout its lifetime, and its independence and subsequent partition was so painful to the stability of the British Empire because of this. It was in some ways the only thing that justified maintaining Imperialism as an institution in spite of the negative stigma that had come to be attached to it.

>>69332747
>>69332784
For the countries as a whole, yes. For individuals its profitable but maintaining whole colonies as well as all the troops, logistics, investment etc. that went into extraction was a massive drain in a countries funding. Coupled with the fact that many colonies were poorly managed in a way that didn't really benefit the natives much and all you're left with is making a small fraction of people rich at the expense of everyone else.

>>69332786
British Industrialists, their investors, their insurers, their lawyers, their staff and the treasury
also for the "actual Brits", we had a guaranteed and closed market, helped for wages, cheaper goods and eventually enough money for major labour reforms
I dont really care about the working class to much but they did benefit somewhat

>>69331489
They don't always. Look what happened in the former Yugoslavia in the 90s.

File: 1481762398360.png (10KB, 400x400px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 400x400px

>>69332747
>He thinks building mines and plantations requires administrating uncivilized natives
y'all mothafuckas need capitalism

>>69333192
We largely let the natives do their own thing and run their own stuff. There were very few colonial staff.
We just wanted it to be safe for trade and so we wanted to reduce disease and crime , and for there to be roads and telgraph

>>69332862
>For individuals its profitable but maintaining whole colonies as well as all the troops, logistics, investment etc. that went into extraction was a massive drain in a countries funding

Colonies are not only self sustaining but supposed to make a profit for their metropolis, if they weren't, why ever have them and hundreds of years of European colonialism across the globe?

The British Empire fell appart because the UK was already finacially demolished by the war (for fuck's sake, they had rationings for years after it), they lost India in an uprising, and after that everything started falling apart.