Just found out my sister had sex with The Weeknd a while ago.

>>69297554
>one person did something
>why are millions of people JUST LIKE THIS?!

>>69297554
Not all women are whores, but your sister sure as hell is.

>>69297705

t. Woman

Why are girls so shit at inductive reasoning?

>>69297741

>Not all women are whores

Is that right?

http://www.menarebetterthanwomen.com/women-are-whores/

>>69297821
ah yes, a very unbiased source. I get all my information straight "Menarebetterthanwomen.com"

File: 1483017424127.png (192KB, 711x633px) Image search: [Google]

192KB, 711x633px

>>69297741
All women are whores, some just hide it better.

>>69297848

Ad-hominem

Good for her

>>69297910
How is everything you've written not a logical fallacy?

>Loaded question
>Extrapolating from insufficient data
>Confirmation bias

>look up The Weekend
>Is Canadian musician of Ethipoian extraction

Wew

File: 1482016454606.png (21KB, 900x900px) Image search: [Google]

21KB, 900x900px

>>69297821
>menarebetterthanwomen.com

File: 1482854394708.png (48KB, 924x560px) Image search: [Google]

48KB, 924x560px

>>69297821
>Besides, the only real reason women hate being called “whores” is the same reason they hate beer: they’re fucking stupid.

>Indiana Jones was a box-office smash because all men are clever, resilient, and bad-ass mavericks. Jaws was a success because all men could fuck up a shark with their bear hands. Pretty Woman was a success because all women are whores.

>>69298154
you can't make this shit up

i need to see what the guy who wrote this looks like.

>>69297972

>Loaded question

I haven't asked any questions

>Extrapolating from insufficient data

Oh yeah? Are you some kind authority on the standards of sufficiency? You're an arrogant cunt for imposing your worldview on others.

>Confirmation bias

Not a logical fallacy

>>69298233
>I haven't asked any questions

>Why are American women so fucking trashy

This is a loaded question. You're implying that something is true, as opposed to asking "Are American women trashy based on this evidence?".

>Oh yeah? Are you some kind authority on the standards of sufficiency?

By that logic we can ask why Men are so evil because they compromise the majority of serial killers, I think we can both agree that your sister doesn't represent even a significant portion of women in America.

If that were the case, couldn't we ask why all American men are as autistic as you?

>You're an arrogant cunt for imposing your worldview on others.

Isn't that what you're doing?

>>69298233
>t. Woman
>Why are girls so shit at inductive reasoning?

Aren't these ad-hominems too?

>>69298371

>Why are American women so fucking trashy

I'm not OP and I know what a loaded question is

>I think we can both agree that your sister

OP's sister wasn't the evidence I was using for my argument

>Isn't that what you're doing?

No. I'm laying out my argument for why all women are whores

>>69298511

No. An ad hominem would have been "t. Woman therefore your argument is invalid." An insult is only an ad hominem if it's used in place of an argument

>>69298951
>An insult is only an ad hominem if it's used in place of an argument

t. woman was used in place of an argument. That is an ad-hominem.

>>69298951
>No. I'm laying out my argument for why all women are whores

Which argument might that be by the way?

The only """arguments""" are what OP's sister did and an opinion article on the unbiased and informative site "menarebetterthanwomen.com".

>>69297554
the weeknd is pretty famous, imagine if you effed selena gomez or ariana grande, you would brag too.

>>69298996

>t. woman was used in place of an argument

Wrong

>>69299028

>an opinion article on the unbiased and informative site "menarebetterthanwomen.com".

Your dismissing the argument in the article based on the name of the website. That's an ad hominem. No different than saying "MLK was wrong because he was black."

>>69298183
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T0xoKiH8JJM

>>69297554
Your sister's not just a whore. She's a retarded whore.
Women sleeping with famous men is just a matter of proximity and availability. Boasting that she was in the proximity of some literally who negro and allowed him to use her as diversionary entertainment earns her less "respect" than she would have if she were chaste and loyal.

>>69299261
You don't really believe this false equivalency, do you?

>>69299988
*tips fedora

>>69299549
>Your dismissing the argument in the article based on the name of the website

There is no argument, it's an edgy opinion

>>69299988
I'm talkng about among other woman. Out of all the whores he could have smashed, he chose her. That means something among hoes.

>>69300149
>Out of all the whores he could have smashed, he chose her.

Well, I suppose that means *something*. Not much to boast about though, if all he did was pump her and dump her, and move onto the next whore immediately after her.

>>69300031
Not an argument.

>>69297554
That's awesome lmao

>>69297554
He's a world famous rich popstar, you'd probably fuck him too if you were a girl. I think someone just has a case of the incel blues?

>>69297554
ebin

>>69297554
If I fucked a famous woman, I'd brag about it too

>>69300294
Remember how special you felt? Father Vickers could have had his choice of any alter boy, but he chose you. Probably meant a lot, you probably would have bragged if not for the threats of excommunication and eternal damnation.

File: Ethiopia2_1170x487.jpg (129KB, 1170x487px) Image search: [Google]

129KB, 1170x487px

ETHIOPIANS FUCKING YOUR WOMEN

>>69302391
lmao

>>69302411
I'd rather adopt pitbulls with AIDS.

>>69302391
lmao