>Muh battle of Kircholm
delet this
>>69259689
Narva never forget
>>69259457
>all the battles are from 1700+ when Pooland was already trashed and destroyed, dying
>no mention of previous conflicts
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Karksi_(1600)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Wenden_(1601)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Kokenhausen
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Siege_of_Wolmar
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Siege_of_Fellin
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Reval_(1602)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Siege_of_Weissenstein
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Rakvere_(1603)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Weissenstein
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Kircholm
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Siege_of_P%C3%A4rnu
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Salis
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Daugavgriva_(1609)
Try again. Or maybe you want me to keep going?
>>69259457
>What is Poltava?
>>69259795
Russia was in it's prime, however
>>69259836
A predictable battle outcome, exhausted army vs an three times bigger more prepared army
>>69259852
Well, you fucked up.
You could have prevented this.
this could be us but you playin
>>69259909
Yes, it's widely accepted that we would've won if we had mounted an offensive instantly after narva
>Go to war dying for your "Empire" only for it to crumble and turn into a cesspool of cultural marxism, degeneracy and islamistic sharia rule
I honestly feel bad for every Swede pre-WW2
>>69259754
t. was neutral during the Cold war
>>69259903
On the other hand, what did you do to make your army exhausted? What have you forgot in Ukraine? Did you really expected that hohols will help you? (lol)
>>69260183
He tried
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ivan_Mazepa
but Ukies were too cuck to do it.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sW4BrJHZBmE
>>69260105
What input could Sweden at that time possibly have? It's not like we had a particular favorite in the conflict either, it switched
>>69260532
ok
I just wanted to post something
It's really boring here right now
>>69260591
Try vodka
>>69260665
I never drink since alcoholics here are degenerate
>>69260745
>>69260798
I wonder how it tastes since I imagine vodka to be a mix of water and alcohol/spirit
>>69261129
I didn't even think it existed desu. Often you just mix vodka with another beverage just so it becomes alcoholic so i have no idea why it exists.
>>69261287
Desu=desu. Autocorrect
Stormakt go home
>>69262051
>Kalmarunionen
>Stormakt
Impressive
>>69262355
Didn't even need a union to be considered an Empire.
t. Knud den store
>>69262848
Weak targets, and our empire lasted 5x more
>>69263135
>weak targets
>literally conquered england
>lasted 5x more
Denmark and Norway were united for almost 800 years.
>>69263306
England was much Weaker back then and we had Finland for just as long
>>69263376
>post bullshit
>give counterargument
>"nuh-uh that dont count"
Swedes everybody..
>>69263445
Okay, which one of us took 1/3 of the others country and managed to hold onto it
>>69263630
Finnish soldiers
>>69263767
At most 1/3 of the army was finnish but good try
>>69263630
Stop projecting. This is about whether or not Denmark were ever a great power or part of one.
>>69263767
German mercenaries actually.
>>69263899
Mercs were the most common during that period, don't use it to nullify swedens achievements though as they were still led by swedish generals.
I don't exactly know if it was a great power. But if i search none of the results are hinting at it
>>69263899
I'd say Denmark-Norway at the height of it's power could probably be considered a great power in it's own right.
>>69259457
>Swedish king win a battle
>get killed in the other
>Swedes start to get BTFO until France saves their butt
>L-LION OF T-THE NORTH C-ATHOLIKEKS
>>69265766
Maybe because we fought against greater odds and our king really was a military genius