>USA aye nah fuck off

is this webm supposed to be sickening or something?
i find the technological precision quite amazing

>>68340442
USA = pig according to britain

this is cool though, can't wait till technological unemployment

>>68340459
not a canacuck if he doesnt talk about some prog-commie bs like basic income

>>68340512
???

>>68340512
Basic income would really be the best solution for wealthy nations because it gives the intelligent and creative people the freedom to work on things while supplicating the dregs.
We don't progress by working shitty jobs to death, making millionaires even richer. It's the scientists, engineers and academics who promote real social and technological change, of which are paid fuck all by comparison to the wealthy people who hire them.

File: Seal #34 - Concern.jpg (57KB, 620x415px) Image search: [Google]

57KB, 620x415px

Hmmmmm

Now just what did he mean by this?

>>68341470
chemist here, you're full of shit lol. Amongst ciences and engineering (which overlap a lot in the job market) getting a decent job is not too hard (unless you take biology or other overinflated course). If anything basic income would increase taxes for us and our activity.
Basic income is only good for permanently-jobless people, like those bafoons in social scienes (and humanities to a lesser degree)

Wanna help sciences? increase scientific funding, especially for the universities needing expensive equipment/materials (i.e chemistry, physics, biology, medicine)

>>68340381
t. Ali bin-Salami

>>68340381
>Paki hates technological efficiency and increase in hygiene.
Not suprised desu.

basic income when

>>68343503
As AI become more advanced, we won't even need scientists anymore.

>>68340381
fuck off luddite

>>68343654
I'll be long dead by then, if it ever becomes true.

>>68340381
more of these please