Can someone explain the point of constriction for me? Surely

>>68258573
conscription

>>68258581
Constipation?

contraption?

>>68258573
If you're going all in war you already have trained soldiers ready to deploy

>>68258573
https://youtube.com/watch?v=qB3KlnS2V-Y
This video explains it pretty well

Contraction?

constitution?

Conglomerate?

confliction?

>>68258573
Your nasty guy I won't reply to your board.

connectorization?

Concatenation?

contractualization?

File: 9328759753253.jpg (60KB, 750x408px) Image search: [Google]

60KB, 750x408px

confederation?

contextualization?

conceptualization?

Constitution?

Condensation?

construction?

Conglomeration?

contraception?

content?

conspiration?

>>68258573
It teaches them to be productive citizens and teaches them what it's like not living in mommy's house. I guarantee you countries with conscription have less NEETs

contemplation?

Convalescence?

convection?

contrition?

confutation?

configuration?

File: Python_Snake_Closeup_Picture.jpg (209KB, 1920x1200px) Image search: [Google]

209KB, 1920x1200px

>>68258573
>Can someone explain the point of constriction for me?


Ssssssssure... I can give it a ssssssssshot...

Universal conscription, national service, etc., whatever you call it, has the following potential benefits:

- imbue military virtues, discipline, response to authority, recognition of hierarchy, and patriotism in the next generation
- keep young people out of trouble, away from crime, drugs, promiscuity
- cast the widest possible net to pick up full-time military talent
- be prepared in advance for total war, instead of having to draught and train conscripts in a hurry

I think there are a few others that I've neglected but this is basically the idea. It's a pretty sensible policy provided hippie sentiment/resentment doesn't undermine the first, and provided that lax control of soldiers doesn't undermine the second.

>>68258573
connection?

conniption?

conjuration?

conflagration?

concubine?

concessions?

concentrations?

Constantinople?

concrete?

File: 1480670074799.png (50KB, 657x527px) Image search: [Google]

50KB, 657x527px

Include me in the screenshot or ELSE

>>68258573
People are spending some time in the army and then they're in reserve. So, instead of keeping a huge amount of people on the service right now, like in America, you can save money and have a little army right now and expand it to the huge numbers during wartime

File: psshh.png (123KB, 785x757px) Image search: [Google]

123KB, 785x757px

>>68262295
don't think so, kiddo

convection?

>>68258964
quite the opposite, institutionalization kills individualism and makes people less independent.

In wartime you haven't got a time for good training.

>>68258573
It's mostly useful for countries that are too small to form sizeable volunteer armies.

>>68258573
really feels nice on the old bollocks

>>68262554
Fortunately for countries like mine the EU removes any possibility of getting invaded, because our volunteer army could not engage in a war with either of our neighbours, would have to be guerrilas

War...war never changes

EDIT: WOW THANKS FOR THE REDDIT GOLD!

EDIT2: WOW I SMASHED MY HEAD AGAINST THE WALL OOPS HAHA

File: 1329164043138.jpg (23KB, 208x188px) Image search: [Google]

23KB, 208x188px

>>68259143
>imbue military virtues, discipline, response to authority, recognition of hierarchy, and patriotism in the next generation
>keep young people out of trouble, away from crime, drugs, promiscuity
>cast the widest possible net to pick up full-time military talent

>>68262614
>not invading Britain after they leave the EU

You guys owe them one, at least take back the north.

>>68258573
It's to late to train conscripts in the time of a war were your soldiers are dead already.

>>68262175
Soldiers from concrete are bulletproof?

>>68262675
The problem with invading the north is you have to keep the north.

Not only is it an economic black hole but half of the population are protestants

>>68262716
>half of the population are protestants

then purge the heretics