WOW Really DOES make me THINK

>

>>68063981
What?

You know > isn't something exclusive or invented by 4chan?

hate speech should be legal

>>68063922
when will the meme of alt-right being a legitimate political ideology end?

>>68064062
How is it not?

>>68063922
thats exactly the same as what netouyos say
it looks just like another repetitive trash to me

>>68063922
>double quoting
What the fuck am I reading?

>>68064125
You are against freedom of speech?

What's wrong with netouyos?

>>68064010
> + "

>>68064269
Maybe to separate the quotes? i dunno

>>68064010
we use it here because it causes greentext, on twitter it makes no sense
normal people use other signs, it's clear this guy is just posting as if he was still on 4chan

>>68064062
The (((alt-right))) is a plot to undermine true conservatism.

>>68064072
It's core ideology is "whatever Trump says at any given moment, even if that contradicts what he said yesterday."

>>68064638
The term “alt-right” was first coined byRichard Spencer, as an intellectual alternative to the dry “Conservatism, Inc.” that then passed for right-wing thought. Since then, the term has really taken on a life all its own.

As others have noted, the alt-right really isn’t a political movementper sebut rather a zeitgeist. The big-tent alt-right includes identitarians andarcheofuturists, race realists andHBD bloggers, the European New Right (ENR),edgelords,neo-reaction(NRx) andreaction(Rx), trad Christians, neo-pagans, white nationalists,PUAs, etc. (Note, these groups are not mutually exclusive. For example, an alt-righter might consider himself an identitarian and race realist.)

Trump has little to do with it

>>68064703
I just call myself a white nationalist my race and nation comes before all other issues.

File: 1480395792783.gif (2MB, 250x277px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 250x277px

>>68063922
>implying twitter needs to follow the first ammendment

File: Screenshot_2016-11-30-03-47-55-1.jpg (548KB, 1080x1223px) Image search: [Google]

548KB, 1080x1223px

>>68063922
>pic related also makes me think

>>68063922
>the first amendment applies to private companies
Lmao, yet more SJW-teir victim complex bitching from the alt-right.

>>68063922
>this is true
>nobody of any significance supports the banning of personal ownership and display of the Confederate battle flag
>businesses can conduct themselves as they wish; free speech also means I don't have to provide a platform for you
>genuinely disturbing to see how common this phrase has become
What's your point, leaf?