I aways tought this meant that she is the sandwich, the whole

>tunna

>>67883528
>monolingual twat

>>67883528
plz tell me, it's a sandwich that is an idiot or is it an sadwich made of idiot? this is killing me

It's a sandwich with an idiot as an ingredient
I didn't get it the first time too

>>67883620
Do sandwiches not exist in Brazil?
A sandwich is the entirety of two slabs of something that is the same with stuff in the middle.

>>67883603
So, what then, OP is talking about a "barrell" sandwich? Or a "ton" sandwich? Or a "crow's nest (of a ship" sandwich? Or maybe a "fidgety" sandwich?

None of those things, from languages in which "tunna" is a word, make any sense, and "tunna" doesn't mean anything in Portuguese. Go to school you idiot sandwich, learn something.

File: Thatface20110725-22047-wlaopv.png (7KB, 645x773px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 645x773px

>>67883667
In Brazil we're too poor, so there is no stuff in the middle.

File: image.jpg (61KB, 600x717px) Image search: [Google]

61KB, 600x717px

>>67883777
:(

i always thought she was the ingredient

File: IDIOT SANDWICH.jpg (164KB, 1803x597px) Image search: [Google]

164KB, 1803x597px

>>67883711
>>67883667

let me explain

in picture A the whole sandwich is an idiot, regardless of it's ingredients. I'm calling it an idiot just like I could call it delicious

in picture B there is bread and there is "idiot", the ingredient. When you spread idiot in the bread it becomes an idiot sandwich

I aways tough he meant A but now I think it's B

>>67883925
Yes, it is b.

>>67883913
>>67883957
thanks, that's probably it
but I'm still curious if there is someone who thinks the same way I did

>>67883425
She's obviously the ingredient, otherwise he wouldn't be holding bread to her face.

peanut butter sandwich = peanut butter + bread
idiot sandwich = idiot + bread

She's an idiot, and with the addition of a bread container The whole set becomes an idiot sandwich. If she lost her bread she would revert to merely being an idiot. but as long as she is contained between those two pieces of bread, the entire set of bread-idiot-bread is an idiot sandwich.

>>67884083
so if I hold a delicious sandwich from the ingredients it won't stop being delicious?

>>67884225
What?

>>67884225
It will still be delicious. It just won't be a sandwich.

You could think of "sandwich" as being kind of like an adjective meaning "between two pieces of bread". So a tuna sandwich is "tuna between two pieces of bread," a roast beef sandwich is "roast beef between two pieces of bread," and an idiot sandwich is "idiot between two pieces of bread."

I mean, sandwich isn't actually an adjective - the ingredient is the adjective - but you get what I'm saying.

>>67884083
>>67883425
the bread has become an extension of her

>>67884370
I know right?

File: int.png (537KB, 1388x2372px) Image search: [Google]

537KB, 1388x2372px

>>67883425

>>67884485
Language learning is part of international discussion but jannies once banned me for asking why there wasn't a Russian translation for fun.
It was 2 years ago but I still remember it.

>>67884353
>>67884106
I understand that logic, I just wanted to know which one is right

I mean, the other one is right too, but I guess it's just common sense that he is talking about the ingredient

in portuguese it would be "sanduiche de idiota" and not "sanduiche idiota" but I'm familiar with the lack of prepositions in the english language

>>67884485
nice cap xd

>>67883425
She could be a sandwich if we include his hands, like whe in terms of porn we say "sandwich", it does not mean coitus with bread, but a human being stuffed between other two.
Another example is building material, a sandwich panel. It wont be sandwich if it had only the insulatinon material without wooden planks around.

>>67883425
idiot is not an adjective (in English). that would be "idiotic". so an "idiotic sandwich" would be what you thought.
>>67884106
kek, I couldn't really think of a good way to explain the reasoning behind that difference in meaning, but that will do
>>67884485
shut up, we're having a serious discussion here

>>67884967
That would imply the sandwich acts like an idiot or is a sandwich created by an idiot who cannot create sandwiches that are not stupid.

>>67884485
hi plebbit