Why are Scandinavians such subhumans?
>>67683049
stop hitting yourself
>>67683049
Scandinavia was too cold, so civilization settled pretty late.
>>67683049
NEVER CALL ANYONE SUBHUMAN. It's mean! APOLOGIZE.
>>67683049
Were* is the word you're looking for.
Scandifags are awesome now.
>>67683344
>Scandifags are awesome now
Yes autism and depression sure is awsome.
>>67683275
Civilization is yet to come here
>>67683495
Living in the best, comfiest part in the world, close to based Russia and crapping from up there on the rest of europe.
Depression and autism might be problems I am not familiar with, but you sure as fuck have room to improve, and still dump loads on everybody else.
>L-m-a-o
>>67683049
Swedish Vikings founded Russia and traded with the Byzantines
It's the Norwegians and Danes that were subhuman
>>67683049
A FUCKING SNEK
>>67684258
>What is Danelaw
Anglos denial is cute
>>67684258
>Swedish Vikings founded Russia
Nuh uh
>According to the FamilyTreeDNA Rurikid Dynasty DNA Project, Rurik appears to have belonged to Y-DNA haplogroup N1c1, based on testing of his modern purported male line descendants.[6] N1c1 is not widely found in Scandinavian countries, but is overwhelmingly found among Baltic and Finnish ethnicities. The N1c1 haplotype possess the distinctive value DYS390=23, also rarely found in Scandinavia. The closest relatives of the Rurikid haplotype are found in coastal Finland.
>>67683495
> Civilization is yet to come here
t. Abedihomibrahim al-Achmadibahalcada bin Durka Durka
>>67684490
>>67684574
Wrong
>>67684610
>Wrong
Genetics are irrefutable lad, Rurikids were ethnic Finns
>>67684610
>Ausfag
>Not shitposting
Choose one.
>>67684641
I don't know Enough about haplomemes, but if they considers themselves Swede, then so be it
>>67684776
Rurik never identified himself as Swedish as such an identity didn't exist at the time. He spoke Norse as it was the lingua franca of all Baltic seafarers at the time, but it doesn't prove that it was his native language.
>>67684574
>>67684842
WE
>>67685749
Not an argument