Where were you when the UK became a police state?

>>67618877
How many terror attacks have we had lately?

>>67619047
More than Spain, and I'm fairly sure we don't live in a dystopian novel.

>>67619047
More than Finland, and I'm fairly sure we don't live in a dystopian novel.

>>67619047
>the le I would trade freedom for security face

Kill yourself, cuck.

File: 1476653703989.jpg (48KB, 310x336px) Image search: [Google]

48KB, 310x336px

>>67618877
>became

>>67619047
More than any other European country sans France, and I'm pretty sure they don't live in a dystopian novel.

The English are a remarkably and hopelessly servile people

>>67618877
>implying the NSA haven't been doing the exact same thing for over 10 years now

>>67619657
>Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.
>Temporary safety

Doesn't apply. We're gonna be safe forever.

>>67619887
>taking the Americans' example on anything
Truly the most cucked nation on Earth

>>67619897
Not until you all get locked up 24/7 in your individual little prison cells will you truly be safe.

>>67619785
Not really. Only thing we had recently was some kid who put a shit bomb in the tube but it was discovered quickly and he was caught. Other than that, just niggers chimping out and stabbing people and that barely counts.

>>67620040
Why would the government ever misuse or abuse their power? Such an act is unthinkable.

File: 1476628351572.png (7KB, 480x480px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 480x480px

>>67619897
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6DsG9yQrdD4

File: british pig BBQ Iraq.jpg (136KB, 634x499px) Image search: [Google]

136KB, 634x499px

HAHAHAH fuck em

I enjoy watching britshits suffer


about time the entire world started grabbing these rabid imperialists by the throat and putting them in their place

>>67619887
If they are, and they probably are, it's illegal and also unconstitutional

Meanwhile, in Britain, it's the law

Not a trivial difference

File: 1478259479942.png (49KB, 234x284px) Image search: [Google]

49KB, 234x284px

>>67620112

He says as his country is begging for British troops to be deployed within their borders

File: Dead britshit liberators Iraq.jpg (10KB, 276x182px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 276x182px

>>67620300

If that ever happens Im grabbing my AK and going britshit swine hunting

>>67620456
>Implying that one subhuman ape with a gun would be able to do any damage against trained soldiers.

>>67619887
They have at least the decency to do it and keep it to themselves.

>>67620456
>http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-36739781

Good luck Toiletkun

File: britshit (2).jpg (10KB, 355x493px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 355x493px

>>67620627


(you)

>>67620697
Oh no a peice of cloth in shit, im so offended

File: britfaggots.jpg (92KB, 539x418px) Image search: [Google]

92KB, 539x418px

>>67620762

>>67618877
>became
>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Children_Act_1989

In UK the State can literally stole your child

>>67620651
>didnt go to britshit link

I dont take your bullshit propaganda seriously

File: 1465405715744.png (345KB, 628x486px) Image search: [Google]

345KB, 628x486px

>>67620093
>be British
>kid puts shit bomb into tube
>"we can't have this, let's gather everyone's search history so it won't happen again!"
>mfw

>>67620627
>leleerigbyface.jpeg

File: Best Day Of My Life.jpg (9KB, 284x177px) Image search: [Google]

9KB, 284x177px

AAHAHAHAH FUCK THE ANGLO COCKSUCKERS


KILL EM ALL

>>67620869
You're speaking our language, you're cleaning our toilets and you're using our wealth for your own survival.

Truly cucked.

File: 1479593664057.jpg (123KB, 539x418px) Image search: [Google]

123KB, 539x418px

>>67620762

Mass surveillance has always been worse in the UK than the US


>Privacy International's 2007 survey, covering 47 countries, indicated that there had been an increase in surveillance and a decline in the performance of privacy safeguards, compared to the previous year. Balancing these factors, eight countries were rated as being 'endemic surveillance societies'. Of these eight, China, Malaysia and Russia scored lowest, followed jointly by Singapore and the United Kingdom, then jointly by Taiwan, Thailand and the United States. The best ranking was given to Greece, which was judged to have 'adequate safeguards against abuse'.[4]


https://www.rt.com/uk/174172-british-intelligence-lacks-oversight/

>>67620869
There are still ways to keep your internet activity private, even with these new laws. Besides, the government/intelligence agencies simply don't have the manpower to sift through every individual's internet history. They will most likely just use it to track suspect/known criminals.

The only people this harms are nonces and pakis who are stupid enough to get caught.

File: 1477839688170.png (74KB, 293x291px) Image search: [Google]

74KB, 293x291px

>mfw the /brit/ janny is from GCHQ

>>67621176
Didn't mean to quote.

File: Pepe Jihad.jpg (9KB, 225x225px) Image search: [Google]

9KB, 225x225px

>>67621073
I also speak two other languages fluently you stupid faggot fuck

>be me doing errands down town
>some retarded inbred looking anglo fuckboi with fucked up teeth walks up to me
>starts babbling his anglo babble asking for direction
>Tell him "no habla englisio" and walk away with a smug smile on my face.

fucking wew lad

>>67620978
>Be unarmed get machete'd
>Be armed police get, shhttp://www.johnstonsarchive.net/terrorism/wrjp255a.html

Where can I move to for a comfy life where everyone just leaves me alone?

Decent standard of living would be nice too so no Antarctica.

don't get what's bad about this lads, care to explain?

>>67621223
>"only criminals have anything to fear. I foresee no negative consequence to selling my soul to the state"

Jesus you people didn't even have a 9/11 and you sound like a soccer mom from Iowa in 2003.

>>67621341

just kill yourself and dont contaminate anymore parts of the world, pommy

>>67621385
>coming from a pole
ironic

>>67619897
He says from his padded room

File: nice.gif (2MB, 320x240px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 320x240px

>>67618877
lmao

genuinely do not give one shit and nothing you can say will make me care

>>67621318
Many of these involved no injuries or deaths

nice list paki cunt

>tories
not even once

>>67621352
>>67621352
>"only criminals have anything to fear. I foresee no negative consequence to selling my soul to the state"
Please tell me where I said this.

Like I said, it's still perfectly possible to remain hidden on the internet. The only uneducated people are affected by this.

>>67621490
>Corbyn abstained
Politicians. Not even once.

>>67618877
literally don't care

what's the issue with this?

>>67621525
fuck corbyn too

>>67618877
That's ridiculous, shit like that won't fly in the European court of human rights.

oh, wait

File: hahahaaaaaaaaa.jpg (2MB, 1748x2480px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1748x2480px

>>67621385
Look at this assblasted pole, look at him and laugh

File: 1477315648262.jpg (65KB, 601x601px) Image search: [Google]

65KB, 601x601px

>>67618877
I really fucking hate this country.

We voted Brexit to spite the 'elite' and yet they were totally unspited and now have passed laws to spy on us.

And they say it's reasonable because the police have to have a good reason to spy on us, yet this is the same inept police that allowed 1400 girls to get raped lest they were called racist.

Talking of rape, isn't it funny how every party in the 80s has been accused of raping children and in some cases murdering people either in those sadistic acts or alternatively to cover their tracks. Sure there are lots of false allegations seeming to muddy the true ones, but never forget cyril smith (the one admitted case where this did happen) or the fact that dossiers went missing and people who were meant to investigate this shit either went missing, were told to shut up (in the past) or at he moemnt are now resigning from such a post. We'll probably never know exactly who raped who, but we can be safe in the knowledge that no major police nor governmental reform will ever take place stopping this from ever happening again, and we can also take solace in the fact that the same circles of people continue to take the moral high ground on us and dictate our lives.

It isn't really about left or right, as far as I'm concerned everything is back to front, because no one gives a monkeys about any of their civil liberties in the UK. I don't care for any of the primary colours, nor the secondary ones in particular. Especially when there is a house of lords where the will of the majority of people is counteracted by the private interests of a select-few (a good example would be Lords with their interests in private healthcare companies against the beloved NHS).

The Iraq War, the surveillance, the multiculturalism and political correctness, it's a shit sandwich and we all have to take a bite. I would move but brexit has complicated that

>>67621461
40% that you are not white. 12% That im not white.
t.Roke

>>67621628
european court of human rights has nothing to do with the european union (of which we are still a part of and will remain so for the foreseeable future)

in theory, if a case regarding this law made its way up to the court of human rights it could very well get overturned

>>67621513
>having to hide behind proxys to protect your basic right to privacy.

I don't even think I need to explain how absurd this is. Literally China tier.

File: britshit got bombed lol.jpg (16KB, 275x183px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 275x183px

>>67621700
I knew this one britshit journalist that got literally ass blasted by Arab sperm not long ago too

Only Nonces, Pakis and other scum fear this. If the government wants to know what i wank to then thats fine. Its abit gay desu on there part

Bongers are also limiting access to porn.
https://www.theguardian.com/culture/2016/nov/19/pornography-sites-face-uk-block-under-enhanced-age-controls

>>67621846
what's wrong with state surveillance mate?

why do poles get so assblasted over us?

is it just because we don't like your diaspoora? or is it because muh stalin?

>>67619047
More than Bulgaria

>>67621854
>if you have nothing to hide you have nothing to fear

shit excuse to be honest, it's like liking another man's cum out of your wife's vag after hes just fucked her raw whilst u wanked to it in the corner.

>>67621880
would you like it if someone was secretly recording into your house whilst you got dressed?

I quite like 1984. Cant wait for it.

>>67621857
oh no! they're going to stop children looking at porn? what has the world come to....

of course as I am over 18 this does not affect me, however I see while you might be concerned

>>67621934
That doesn't eve make sense. Try again.

>>67619047
A lot

>>67621998
wouldn't know or care

>>67621846
The USA is far worse when it comes to shit like this. Besides, the government can already do far worse things than look at your internet history. This is true for pretty much every country.

File: britshitEdition.jpg (109KB, 638x512px) Image search: [Google]

109KB, 638x512px

>>67619047
Not bloody nearly enough for what you pieces of shit really deserve.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i_IuHA5DKGY


Next bomb that goes off in your shithole Im celebrating by opeing a bottle of wine and toasting it up

>>67622009
>defending this shit
>not agreeing how embarassing it is
>>67622018
cucks enjoy when someone fucks their shit up
whether it's their wives or their civil liberties.

>>67622085
literally why are you so upset

>>67622009
>how does it affect me
sites will choose to ignore the british market and your selection of porn will be more limited
it's the same concept as trying to create regulation for just about anything as an insignificant market

>>67622045
why are you such a fucking spastic

>not caring about whether soemone is invading your privacy at your most intimate just because youj're too spineless to stand up to the government's tyranny.

ffs lad.

>>67622165
literally what difference does it make

>>67622009
they could take away your right to wipe your own ass and you would still defend it for the sake of saving face on an image board.

>w-wiping is dangerous the government says so!
>t-this is for the best guys s-seriously!!
>r-rule Britannia r-rule the waves

>>67622200
why are americans so paranoid about their government? you lads get spied on loads anyway haha

>>67622126
>sites will choose to ignore the british market and your selection of porn will be more limited

because children wont watch it?

how would I have limited selection on the bloody internet anyway

>>67622200
not an argument in the slightest mate ;)

>>67622187
when the government can actually fine you for torrenting a film it will make a difference

or when some spook at gchq decides to leak your shemale-fetish when you start to get into the public eye it'll make a difference.

you're giving the government a knife with which to hang over your head, should they so please. It's the same way teenage girls commit suicide when their boyfriend leaks pictures of her online or something. Only a literal autist wouldn't care about this shit.

Of course you're trying to bat away people bantering you on /int/, but that aside you should realise how shameful this is.

>>67622165
>m-m-muh liberty
foy

File: british pig raped.jpg (16KB, 322x260px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 322x260px

lol'd

>>67622200
this so much

>defending the shit decisions of our government to defend yourself from jokes on /int/

why lads? just admit its shit and foreigners will not make fun of you. if you try to defend this heinous shit you look like someone who spreads their arsecheeks for the government to fuck.

>>67622050
Should law enforcement breach your right to privacy in investigating you- you cannot be held liable for what they find in a court of law because it was uncovered illegally. The case would immediately be thrown out.

Now if your Chi- we the UK then you'd say fuck that and make it legal. Rights are for criminals anyway right guys?

>>67622334
oh no getting punished for breaking the law? what an injustice!

and the second bit only matters if you treat the internet as a private means of communication (it isn't)

>>67622345
>i'm a-ok letting the government literally keep tabs on what my porn fetishes are
runt

File: billboard.jpg (121KB, 500x333px) Image search: [Google]

121KB, 500x333px

Just here to remind the uk lads to pay their tv licenses.

>>67622491
>i'm embarassed about what kind of porn i watch
why?

>>67622334
reading the actual OP post, it doesnt seem to affect me AT ALL unless the police have a warrant, or i already have some sort of criminal record

as for the hacking part, they already do that in the USA and probably already here. This just makes it public

conclusion: This isn't really that "shamefur"

>>67622466
I'm pretty sure you'd be unhappy if someone walked up to you in public with a recording device.

I'm fairly sure you'd try to avert them. You wouldn't sit there thinking 'this is totally fine'.

>>67622437
To be fair mate I don't think anyone in this thread actually supports this. They're just the perennial /int/ neets who get their satisfaction out of posting here. They can't risk their country's reputation here or they risk losing the only satisfaction they get in between mum's pasties and welfare checks from the government.

>>67622603
what, like cctv? could not give less of a shit lad

>>67622437
Isn't that what brits do the best?

File: dead brtishit invaders Iraq.jpg (44KB, 443x300px) Image search: [Google]

44KB, 443x300px

ALLAHU AKBAR

File: 1479548768628.jpg (641KB, 1208x1920px) Image search: [Google]

641KB, 1208x1920px

>>67619047
More than us

>>67622264
Not like you do. And assuming we did, we don't legislate it.

>>67622594
I'm personally not embarassed, but I'd prefer the government didn't have that as defamation/blackmail ammunition should i ever try to get into the public eye for example.

>>67622602
the police in the UK are horribly inept, I wouldn't trust them.

They have let 100s of children get raped, both by migrants and potentially by politicians. In the face of hidden agendas I wouldn't trust them in upholding public decency.

>>67622715
ahh yes, it's better if surveillance is beyond the realms of legal responsibility

>>67620968
To fucking kek

File: tmp_11278-14738389901491657078746.jpg (231KB, 1995x1000px) Image search: [Google]

231KB, 1995x1000px

>>67621704

File: brit-flag-burn-argentina-falkland_2245917b.jpg (82KB, 620x387px) Image search: [Google]

82KB, 620x387px

what a disgusting shithole fuck of scumbags the UK is.

I understand why good people dont want to immigrate there.

only the lowest bottom feeders.

>>67622669
cctv records your action

i mean some police man walking up to you with a mic whilst you're walking down the high street with your friends. I'm fairly sure you'd feel uncomfortable about that.
>>67622688
as I said I hate this country, because most people genuinely don't care if the government tries to rape them.
>>67622643
honestly I've met people in real life who will regurgitate these sorts of arguments.they sell their common-sense for support of their political party.

people genuinely don't care about these things in the UK and it's very sad.

>>67621341

Montana

>>67622763
You mean it's better to have it be legal then not legal? You're honestly retarded mate. See >>67620968


This damage control is the most fun I've had here in awhile.

File: tmp_11278-1473279448462-1594654452.jpg (1MB, 1273x1909px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1273x1909px

>>67621749
Tories want to leave the ECHR though, May blatantly ignored it when she was secretary of thw interior.
>tories

>>67622905
think of it like guns yankee, you'll understand that

govt surveillance is happening either way, just like people will have guns in your cunt either way. It's better for law-abiding citizens to have it legislated and accountable rather than random and covert

>>67622905
you don't seem to understand

the police need a warrant (IE you have to actually have done something wrong for them to be able to use any of this) or a prior criminal record (which I do not have)

how is this actually a bad thing

>>67619047
Fairly few for a mooslim country

>terrorists hate freedom and liberty of western countries
>so we get rid of our freedom and liberties

really cutting off the nose to spite the face.

>>67623063
>terrorists hate freedom and liberty of western countries
fuck off yank

>>67623022
and if some spook decides to leak information about you?

>>67623123
if freedom and liberty are not british values what are the values that we fight to protect?

>>67623063
We're just ahead of the curve. Now that we have no freedom, liberty, houses, benefits or hospital spaces there's no reason to attack us.

>>67623125
for what pvrpose? so people know I browse /d/?

and why only me? or do you mean mass leak info of thousands of people

>>67623125
what, the thing that they are already able to do both here and in the united states?

>>67623181
we're not fighting to protect any values...

>>67623227
let's say you get too big for you boots and you need to be defamed. your thing for /d/eviancy would be a great way to take you down.

>>67622334
>when the government can actually fine you for torrenting a film it will make a difference
They simply don't have the resources to monitor every individual's traffic for piracy or other relatively minor crimes. The government's priority is and always will be terrorism and other serious criminal activity.

>or when some spook at gchq decides to leak your shemale-fetish when you start to get into the public eye it'll make a difference.
Your ISPs will only catalog your history for a year, everything after that will be forgotten. I believe that ISPs currently store your data for 6 months so this isn't even that different in that regard. If you do suddenly get the public's attention, they won't be able to suddenly start searching through ancient internet history. And the government simply doesn't have the resources to catalogue every single citizen's fetishes. The only thing they will keep track of is potential suspects (which is something they've been doing for years and is something they do in most countries anyway).

>you're giving the government a knife with which to hang over your head, should they so please. It's the same way teenage girls commit suicide when their boyfriend leaks pictures of her online or something. Only a literal autist wouldn't care about this shit.
If a girl willingly sends naked pictures of themself to a guy they barely know then that's their own fault. Likewise, if you decide to start watching terrorist training videos without even trying to make it private then you deserve to get caught.

I don't particularly agree with this law but you're seriously full of yourself if you think the government gives a shit about your tranny fetish.

>>67623233
>we're not fighting to protect any values...
then why do we respect our veterans?
>what, the thing that they are already able to do both here and in the united states?
i guess the difference now is that they are basically admitting that they will be doing this and that it is in the law book. whereas before it was covert and inherently a bit more controversial on their side.

>>67623367
It's also worth mentioning that the government still can't decrypt HTTPS traffic without explicitly MITM-ing your connection, which is pretty easy to notice (unless your machine gets comprimised, but if that happens then you can't really call it your machine any more). All your ISP can see is what sites you've visited, they can't see exactly what you've been doing on that site.

>>67622961
Right because the government will be kind enough to to give you a nice letter when they're going to begin auditing your privacy. You're retarded friend.

>God save the gchq

>>67623325
Liking trannies is probably seen as a progressive thing these days.

>>67623325
pretty much this >>67623367

but also that I would seriously doubt that anybody who managed to get properly into fame or politics would also be browsing what I browse within a year prior

>>67623389
>then why do we respect our veterans
do we? i don't really care and my family had a fair few soldiers in it

>second bit
yeah fair enough i guess

>>67623367
>>67623489
>I don't particularly agree with this law but you're seriously full of yourself if you think the government gives a shit about your tranny fetish.
I don't.

But I'd rather draw my curtains when I decide to don the girlfriend's braziers and panties, rather than keep them open, as it were.

But my qualm is the government is not infalliable, the rape-scandal of the 80s shows that when hidden interests get going, the government can and does abuse its powers and i'd rather not be on the receiving end of that.

>>67623460
you don't seem to understand
the government, right now, are able to do all of these things, in the usa as well as the uk. They will continue to use that power to track suspected terrorists and large scale criminal activity

>>67618877
Well fuck, not happy with PC Paul knowing about my passion for exhibitionist sex videos

With the amount of shitskin colonials and eastern europeans they get its no wonder.

>>67623639
next thing they'll be monitoring the 'chan for hate speech getting people arrested.

>>67623460
Intelligence agencies don't send you a letter when they start to track you, you fucking idiot. It is currently within the law for intelligence agencies to obtain a permit and carry out investigations that would otherwise "break the law". This is true for both the UK and the USA.

>>67623539
well nah of course the government isnt infallible all of the time

but I do generally trust the police overall, and think our laws here are pretty reasonable with a few unrelated exceptions

what i'm trying to say is that i'm generally quite apathetic towards this law.

Is it a breach of my privacy? Yes, of course
Do I think that anything will ever come of this, or that it will be abused? Most likely not in any significant way
Will it increase national security or catch terrorists? We have no way of knowing or verifying, but if it does help then that's always a plus

>>67623721
ISPs (and by extension the government or anybody else) have no way of tracking your specific actions on webpages (yet lmao)

>>67623781
>ISPs (and by extension the government or anybody else) have no way of tracking your specific actions on webpages (yet lmao)

that's not how they'd catch you though on 4chan
>go through archive
>Ask hiroshima which IP addresses said what
>see who was visitting that webpage under that ip address

people have been v& off this site before.

>>67623840
>not using 7 proxies
lad...

something pretty aside from all this but,

can you get done for buying things off tor?

can you get done for piracy?

>>67623721
See >>67623417. At worst, the government will be able to see that you browse 4chan. They won't be able to see what posts you made unless they either comprise your machine or get help from Hiro. This law doesn't force websites to give your data to the government, it only allows them to seek assistance from ISPs.

The janitor literally has more of an insight into how you post than the government.

>>67623840
yeah I know but again that's only for proper nonces or criminals

reckon hiro wouldnt be best pleased if the coppers started calling up each day asking what threads i'd been in

>>67624017
that jersey shitposter wasn't really a proper criminal

he was literally branded an autist by a judge.

shitposting knows few bounds m8, don't want the government saying i incited violence or hate speech because i said 'kys' or 'nigger'.

File: Shitposting on 4chan The Iron Sheikhs Story.png (99KB, 239x320px) Image search: [Google]

99KB, 239x320px

>>67624149
>don't want the government saying i incited violence or hate speech because i said 'kys' or 'nigger'.
Whilst I agree, The Iron Sheikh was hardly your regular shitposter

>>67619047
More than Poland, and I'm fairly sure we don't live in a dystopian novel.

It's not a law yet. It still needs to be reviewed twice by the House of Lords and then voted on by them, and then another vote by both houses if the Lords make any changes

Usually the House of Lords don't allow seriously stupid shit like this to happen

>>67623840
Firstly, 4chan's servers aren't based in the UK so this law wouldn't apply to them.

Secondly, this law doesn't give the government the power to force website owners into assisting them. It only lets them monitor the data that ISPs hold. And quite frankly, anyone on the same network as you can see the exact same data that your ISPs can see.

Thirdly, the government simply doesn't have the resources to punish every 4chan user for saying "nigger" on the internet. Arresting people for stuff they said on Twitter is different, since Twitter accounts are linked to actual people and make it incredibly easy for anyone to identify who said what. With 4chan, everyone is anonymous so it's impossible to tell who said what without getting special help from the 4chan staff. And the government technically already has the ability to find people if they do seem like the pose a serious threat (see Sheikh). This law changes pretty much nothing.

>>67624449
Sheikh was arrested for downloadibg an Al Qaeda magazine, his shitposts were only used as evidence

File: feeling.jpg (9KB, 270x250px) Image search: [Google]

9KB, 270x250px

>>67621704
wasn't ready for this

File: britflagburn.jpg (113KB, 314x344px) Image search: [Google]

113KB, 314x344px

>>67621704
your "elites" are fucking free masonic/ kike / secularist perverts , criminals and pirates.

but hey whats expected from a scumbag infested shithole like the UK? right?

>>67628599
give him a break, at least he isn't one of the cucks in this thread defending the fact that the government is looking at his porn habits