Why is it legal and socially acceptable to like Napoleon and

File: 144789749675.jpg (1MB, 2400x2766px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2400x2766px

>Napoleon
>hero

>>66673166
The frogs still admire him.

>>66673085
Could you be any more right wing cuck? Napoleon wasn't involved in the terror and he did change Europe for good eg the Napoleonic code.

>>66673085
Because Napoleon destroyed the feudal system and church privilege. Also, his efforts to keep the man's rights ideals inside his empire.

What Hitler did again?

>>66673085
Because Napoleon actually did shit for france and a lot of European countries that he took over?
And was actually a good tactician
Unlike Hitler
Hitler only built infrastructure in germany
After that he did fuck all but wars.

File: Joseph-Bonaparte.jpg (135KB, 700x1037px) Image search: [Google]

135KB, 700x1037px

Best Bonaparte coming through

>>66673085
T H E H O L O C A U S T

>>66673085
>What's the difference?

Napoleon was French
Hitler was German (Austrian)

>>66673085
Napoleon didn't commit genocide

>>66673085
Not far from where I live some dumbfuck leftist "nartist" painted a portrait of Mao, and is it exposed at the window of her exposition room, so everyone passing that street can't ignore it.

The man killed as much people as Hitler or Stalin, but in peace time. And nobody bats an eye that his portrait is hanging there. It enrages me every time I see it.

Try doing that with Hitler. The hypocrisy.

>>66673085
>Back then people even thought he was the Antichrist because his barbarism was unprecedented in Europe.

True he even fired cannons at protesting mobs in the street in his early days.

>>66673382
Napoleon caused the death of 5,000,000–7,000,000 people overall, including civilians.

>>66673465
Okay? Still not genocide

>>66673085
the people dying under napoleon were incidental, the deaths under hitler were deliberate

Cauz zog community still isn't death

>>66673589
>incidental
>literally slaughtering everyone who is against the revolution

Oh burger...

>>66673166
Who is this faggot?

Oh, isn't it Blucher's henchman?

napoleon surrendered himself and was locked away, he did his time in his life, in death he is freed

hitler would have sacrificed everyone for the endsieg

you really shouldn't compare him, napoleon deserves better

Vae victis.

Yet it wasn't even a French victory.

French race truly is the MASTERACE.

File: Dancing to the tune of the eternal anglo.jpg (69KB, 566x600px) Image search: [Google]

69KB, 566x600px

>>66675125
>frog damage control

File: adolfulous.jpg (78KB, 590x700px) Image search: [Google]

78KB, 590x700px

>>66673166
>most people still know only Napoleon despite the fact that he lost
Truly, the Greatest Men get their names written in history by any means.

Because Napoleon was the last glorious general. And for all the blood he spilled he left behind good things, blueprints. The things he destroyed were holding us back, the things he created helped move us forward.

Hitler was a cunt who bought into his own frothy-mouthed rhetoric. His only legacy is the bureaucratization of genocide.

File: Nelson.jpg (2MB, 2074x2500px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2074x2500px

Napoleon couldn't even scratch the royal navy, Hitler destroyed the Hood and must therefore be vilified for all of history.