How can other empires even compete?

by being real empires and ruling over civilized ppl

>>66559766
No Brits founded the greatest Empire the world has ever seen FACT.

File: ottocucksbtfo.jpg (692KB, 1979x799px) Image search: [Google]

692KB, 1979x799px

>>66559766
Mostly badly.

>>66559787
I don't think what AustroHungary ruled over was civilised

File: NATO-bases-worldwide.jpg (1MB, 4242x3000px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 4242x3000px

By colonising whites rather than shitskins

File: image.jpg (32KB, 419x249px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 419x249px

>>66559787

How many can proudly call themselves British

versus Roman or even Japanese, empire is not just land and millions of poor farmers but the cultural legacy that it left behind and perpetuated

How many former British subjects honest drink tea and eat biscuits at 3 in the afternoon
versus say how many people willingly use chopsticks

>haha brits only ruled shitskins
>WTF BRITAIN don't attack your based white evropean brethren!!!

which is it cucks?

>>66559766
>brithis guyana

mother of god, literally i just discovered there is a country called like this.

whats happen there?

>>66559878
It's modern Guyana, filled with Indians and Afrocaribs and is a shithole like most of south america

>>66559863
Tea is popular in Asia dumbest and is from there.

>Bunch of seaniggers
Germans could take real countries on

>>66559964

>A Polish Germanboo

How can someone be THIS cucked?

>>66559947

>even brithis cant make a decent country in south america

:(

>>66560006
German minority in Oppeln here

File: ppp.jpg (110KB, 800x783px) Image search: [Google]

110KB, 800x783px

>>66560055
>German
I bet you know five words in German Grzesiu.

>>66559766
wow if the anglo's conquered persia they would of had cape to calcutta

>>66560055

>Literally muh heritage

File: British people.jpg (132KB, 267x1259px) Image search: [Google]

132KB, 267x1259px

>>66559863
>How many can proudly call themselves British

Quite a few I think. British genes have been exported around the world.

File: HDI colonies.png (202KB, 2714x1254px) Image search: [Google]

202KB, 2714x1254px

>>66559766

File: 14313411.png (336KB, 376x430px) Image search: [Google]

336KB, 376x430px

>>66559964
>we can take anyone on
>lose world war
>empire destroyed
>we can take anyone on
>lose world war
>prussian homeland destroyed
>a-at le-least slav rape babies will stand up for us 70 years from now

File: The-British-Empire-1763.jpg (509KB, 1300x843px) Image search: [Google]

509KB, 1300x843px

Comfiest Empire coming through

>>66561239

>Britain could literally have ruled the world if Americunts hadn't chimped out
>Instead we're ruled by Jewish bankers and Chinks

The Eternal Yank strikes again

File: image.jpg (36KB, 244x300px) Image search: [Google]

36KB, 244x300px

>>66560218
>tfw byzantine would have a slice of the new world had the roaches never invaded

>>66560207
>spell in UK English
>speak in US English

File: The_Russian_Empire-en.svg.png (627KB, 3121x1586px) Image search: [Google]

627KB, 3121x1586px

It's not as aesthetics as the Russian Empire though

>>66561505
>no sir john moore

>>66561552
there wasn't enough room for him, the filesize was too big

>tfw it would take gigabytes to display every single thing the British can be proud of

>>66561374
You could have taken China too. Here's Sun Yat Sen Writing On The Topic

> We may thank Heaven that at the time of the British conquest of India no such Company had a stronghold in China, for otherwise China
would have been conquered too. A British conquest of China in those days
would have been as easy as the conquest of India. Around the year 1860,
China was in the throes of civil strife, and her destiny was absolutely
uncertain. The Manchu Emperor had died during his flight to the North,
and the entire nation was not in a mood to resist foreign invasion. If Gordon
had followed the methods of Clive and used a Chinese army to conquer
China, he would probably have encountered no difficulty.

> How much easier the task would have been with the active support from the mother country!
At that juncture, Portugal and Holland had fallen from power while France
and Germany had not yet gained ascendancy. There was no match for
England in a contest for colonies in the East. Since the Crimean War, in
which Russia was defeated by Turkey with the joint assistance of England
and France, England has capitalized on the mutual enmity between France
and Prussia and endeavored to extend her influence in the Orient. Although
the fall of Peking was affected by the joint forces of Britain and France, the
latter had no base of operations in the East. If England, instead of being
content with her trade position, had attempted to conquer China, no country
would have been able to intervene effectively. If England could have
managed within a space of ten years to grab the whole of China, all Asia
would have fallen under British control, for during that period France had
just been defeated by Prussia and the German Empire was still in its
infancy. Had this been the case, Great Britain would not only have retained
its firm grasp on India, but would also have been able to combine the
territories of China and India into one, and secured an impregnable position

File: HMS Victory5.jpg (2MB, 3072x2048px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3072x2048px

>>66561505
I like it.

>>66561505
>thatcher gets a bigger picture than the queen
Northern independence when

File: 1477289834330.png (49KB, 234x285px) Image search: [Google]

49KB, 234x285px

>>66561579
>mfw theres an alternate universe where the British Empire achieved world domination

>>66561579
I really recommend reading the whole essay. It's called "The Vital Problem With China"

He nails British diplomacy

"The secret of the British success in maintaining such a vast empire
is to be found primarily in the traditional foreign policy of Britain. Since
England's defeat of Spain's Invincible Armada, she has been pursuing a
fixed foreign policy, that is, the policy of rallying the weaker countries to
crush the strongest.


In the latter half of the 18th century, England's policy was directed
against France, simply because France in the reigns of Louis XIV and
Louis XV, was the strongest country in Europe; not because England
wanted to redress any possible wrongs suffered by her in the Hundred-
Year's War, nor because England had any territorial ambitions in Europe. In
order to maintain her own interests England cannot allow any country on
the European Continent to grow too strong, and when any country grows
too strong, she must get all the other countries to join her in overthrow-ing
that country.

File: 0ab90cc5272943b70bd00ca8c268585dac8bd71a86d828a748b165538ed98319.jpg (29KB, 420x420px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 420x420px

>>66561638
>the policy of rallying the weaker countries to
crush the strongest

So the eternal anglo meme is just butthurt by other countries because we made sure they never got large enough to challenge us?

Success breeds jealousy

>>66561579

Even if that had happened we would still have lost it. We should have federated and made Canada, Australia, New Zealand and South Africa British. No country can rule foreign lands forever but these countries considered themselves British and the people were mostly British. You guys getting independence was a mistake.

File: empire of sunn.jpg (1MB, 2752x2496px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2752x2496px

>>66559766
Every single empire who didn't rule such defenceless people like Niggers, Jungle Asians, Indians, Native Americans, Aborjinials etc...

File: grand union flag.png (3KB, 450x300px) Image search: [Google]

3KB, 450x300px

>>66561616
> George III dies decades earlier, leaving George IV to rule as a more competent monarch

> The American Revolution is crushed. The French navy strikes disaster and due to internal problems cannot invest any more money in aiding the """"rebels"""". All the leaders are rightfully executed for treason.

> Realizing that some element of autonomy must be granted, Britain founds the Imperial federation, granting representation for colonies in Westminster.

> Britain annexes both China and India, in addition to expanding to its full imperial height in Africa etc.

> Major geopolitical rivals in the 19th century are fighting over Russia in the Great Game, France (Now under a constitutional monarch) and Germany. Also a newly ascendant Japan.

> No WW1 due to unipolar British dominance of the world. However increased conflicts with Russia in central Asia and Japan in East Asia.

>>66561814
Meanwhile the Ottomans ruled over Arabs and Turkified Europeans that they made as backwards as themselves.

>>66561887
There is a difference between Bedouins and Mamluks or Abbasids or Fatimids. Many Arab cities were way more civilized then Europe til 19th century.

File: SmugScones.jpg (65KB, 400x400px) Image search: [Google]

65KB, 400x400px

>>66561948
>YOU ONLY KILLED ARABS
>IT'S TOTALLY DIFFERENT WHEN WE DO IT

File: 715248912541.png (490KB, 449x401px) Image search: [Google]

490KB, 449x401px

>>66561814
>>66561948
>his country only exists because we didn't want slavs dirtying up our pond

>>66562234
>I don't know how politic works
>We helped our eternal enemy because we are humanitarian.

Go cry in Gallipoli m8.

>>66559863

>Japanese empire is responsible for chopsticks

>>66562473
>turks
>eternal enemy
Don't flatter yourself

>>66559766
Why did we never conquer the Saudis?

>>66563726
In 1915 they agreed to become a protectorate

File: 32892.jpg (18KB, 343x383px) Image search: [Google]

18KB, 343x383px

>>66563760
nobody's safe

>>66561948
>Many Arab cities were way more civilized then Europe til 19th century
>til the 19th century
no
maybe til the 16th century. maybe.

But let me get this straight.
When Ottomans conquer arabs/arabs/arabs it's you conquering civilization, but when Brits conquer arabs/arabs/arabs plus+ it's defenceless niggers?

File: ya5Vp7B.png (67KB, 1456x1108px) Image search: [Google]

67KB, 1456x1108px

Raid on the Medway?

>>66559766
>conquer only third world countries
>"empire"

File: 9fe1eb225f7e94ca92e67ab919d0d6a6.png (166KB, 316x703px) Image search: [Google]

166KB, 316x703px

>>66564006
That was against England not Britain. Doesn't count.

>>66564135
That was against the Batavian Republic not Dutch Republic. Doesn't count.

>>66564134
>completely fail at conquering 3rd world countries

>>66564134
They should have failed the first time around and come back later with chem weapons, right?
Can't have an empire without losing to third worlders first...

>>66564134
But those are the best kind of empires, because you can then impose your culture on to them and for generations to come you see the results.

>>66564181
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fourth_Anglo-Dutch_Wa

>The war ended disastrously for the Dutch and exposed the weakness of the political and economic foundations of the Republic

File: 5BFmkc9.png (10KB, 420x420px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 420x420px

>>66564236
wow! you gained some shithole in India

File: sharpe.gif (624KB, 250x164px) Image search: [Google]

624KB, 250x164px

>>66564181
kek

>>66564332
>war starts
>everyone realises they don't really want a war
>peace talks start immediately afterwards

File: Europe_1812_map_en.png (1MB, 2284x1503px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2284x1503px

>>66559766
By conquering relevant lands and defeating relevant foes like in pic related ?

>>66564476
I reckon we should have conquered Scandinavia.
You know, just for the bants and all.

File: 1457843632.png (1MB, 599x922px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 599x922px

>>66564476
>Be Napoleon
>Be the greatest frenchman of all time
>get sat in the naughty corner by britain
>die

>>66564506
>Relevant lands
>scandinavia

hueheuehueheuehuehue

>>66560207
>half British half cheese eating surrender monkey

So close but so far

>>66559766
Yeah that's a big chunk of land, but it is pretty much all ooga booga niggers so it doesn't really count.

>>66564685
You'd be speaking communist if it wasn't for us

File: Gibraltar_aerial_view_looking_northwest.jpg (284KB, 1024x819px) Image search: [Google]

284KB, 1024x819px

>>66564613
How relevant is this rock?

>>66564708
I think you misspelled "USA", mate.

>>66559766
why didn't britain even try to colonise the western part of russia? maybe this country would be developed and rich now and we speaking english instead of r*ssian

>>66564799
we aren't delusional like continentals, why would anyone bother trying to invade russia?

>>66564730
Britain deployed troops, America just wished you luck.

>>66564866
to make the empire bigger, to build and own the roads from europe to china

>>66564872
You are simply wrong, but I am not gonna have a conversation about history on 4chan.
I you wanted to make a "if it wasn't for us you'd ...." you could simply talk about the Greek revolution against the Ottomans in 1821 or most of the stuff that happened until the 1920s.

But I could as well make the statement: "If it wasn't for Greeks you'd still be hanging from trees".

>>66564955
>to build and own the roads

It was all about ships, and still is really.

File: FR-WW1-1915-French-plans.png (203KB, 3223x2324px) Image search: [Google]

203KB, 3223x2324px

>>66559837
>>66559787
Stop it, now all the Hungarians think the French did it, when actually it was the eternal anglo

Here were the based French plans
-no more g*rmany
-early yugoslavia
-constantinople taken back (unlike your dumb memes hurr france is why we don't have muh constantinople)
-middle east is fixed forever by giving it to russia

This was perfect prove me wrong

>>66564996
>WE
I'm sorry, m8... there are more people learning ancient Greek than modern, that's gotta be a wake up call...

>>66559863
>How many former British subjects honest drink tea and eat biscuits at 3 in the afternoon

Quite a lot actually

>>66564726
wrecked

>>66565266
Oh wow. You should have thought about it 60 years ago instead attacking us together with England, ottomans, Sardinia and others.

>>66565423
Napoleon III was a mistake

File: empires.png (151KB, 4072x1254px) Image search: [Google]

151KB, 4072x1254px

>>66560218
No need to thank me

>>66565718
>no québec
what blatant dishonesty

>>66561814
>sandniggers
>a beach in north africa
ggwp

>British Empire doesn't count, they only conquered uncivilised people
>not like the Romans, who in no way conquered people less civilised than them in France, Britain, Central Europe & North Africa
>Or muh european flash-in-the-pan ""Empires""
When will it stop?

>>66566936
Success breeds jealousy

File: IMG_1348.png (7KB, 420x420px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 420x420px

>>66559766
By still existing

>>66560207
>400K

OUT
U
T

>>66564670
Be proud of your glorious French heritage, boi

>>66570386
There's roughly that many French here.

>>66559766
>frozen wasteland
>desert
>savage
>NIGGERS

>>66559766
Looks cozy tbqh

Come and rescue us plz. China is shitting on the Sino-British joint declaration

>>66570490
Oh

l-lewd

>>66559863
>How many former British subjects honest drink tea and eat biscuits at 3 in the afternoon
no one does that here you absolute moron

>>66559766
13 colonies borders really didn't go that far west prior to revolution. Britain actually stopped their westward expansion.

>>66564134
>couldnt even third world countries

>>66561583
post the HMS royal charles :D

>>66573314
That was England not Britain, doesn't count.

>>66559863
Maybe very little do that exact action that you rather arbitrarily described but there are a fuckton of English speaking nations in the world which is a much more objective legacy than what you described.