If Finnish army invade to Poland...

if finland invaded japan would any countries defend it?

>>66410753
No
We accept it

We would gladly accept Finnic rule.

File: 1253.jpg (78KB, 368x614px) Image search: [Google]

78KB, 368x614px

>>66410814
sounds good to me

>>66410925
Why wouldn't you accept Russian and German then?

Ill accept whoever takes warschau away from this country

File: 1463510502548.png (99KB, 836x1145px) Image search: [Google]

99KB, 836x1145px

>>66410814
Sounds like a plan.
Hey Russia! We have to use your railways.

>>66410965
they would

File: 1474999773932.jpg (17KB, 480x317px)

17KB, 480x317px

>>66410710
Nice try, proxy Vanya

File: Lord of Rome.png (385KB, 510x371px) Image search: [Google]

385KB, 510x371px

What if Vatican invaded Japan?

>>66411121
What a heartwarming image

I want a Finnish qts to invade muh dick

Poland is NATO so the Finnish army would get blasted to pieces.

>>66410710
Yez

File: polhun.jpg (125KB, 900x696px) Image search: [Google]

125KB, 900x696px

>>66411469
based Hungary

>>66411374
>>66411469
Which is my lovely Dutch?

>>66411469
magyar cigan

File: 1466610087554.jpg (57KB, 948x711px) Image search: [Google]

57KB, 948x711px

>>66411533

>>66411562
no :^))))

>>66410710
We would defend it the same way we defended it from Germany.

>>66411189
What if Britannia invaded Japan? Would you defend it or accept it?

What if aliens invaded Earth?
Would you try to defend it?

>>66411713
depends on how hot the aliens are

>>66411713
>defending this shithole
I would join aliens and after destroying this gay earth find myself ayylmao qt

>>66411516
Yeah. I believe we're in the rapid response force of the UK.

File: 1463511079820.png (4KB, 211x246px) Image search: [Google]

4KB, 211x246px

>>66411713
But we are already here?

>>66411713
Depends. Are they hot? Will there be tentacle rape if we accept defeat? What do they want? Our land? Our water? Our strawberry ice cream?

>>66411789
What if aliens were Commies?

>>66411841
then pretend to agree with it and keep living with my qt xeno waifu

File: za rossiyushu.jpg (9KB, 235x289px) Image search: [Google]

9KB, 235x289px

What if this guy invaded your bedroom?

File: lenin.jpg (60KB, 520x720px) Image search: [Google]

60KB, 520x720px

>>66411877
In this sense, the theory of the Communists may be summed up in the single sentence: Abolition of private property.

We Communists have been reproached with the desire of abolishing the right of personally acquiring property as the fruit of a man’s own labour, which property is alleged to be the groundwork of all personal freedom, activity and independence.

Hard-won, self-acquired, self-earned property! Do you mean the property of petty artisan and of the small peasant, a form of property that preceded the bourgeois form? There is no need to abolish that; the development of industry has to a great extent already destroyed it, and is still destroying it daily.

Or do you mean the modern bourgeois private property?

But does wage-labour create any property for the labourer? Not a bit. It creates capital, i.e., that kind of property which exploits wage-labour, and which cannot increase except upon condition of begetting a new supply of wage-labour for fresh exploitation. Property, in its present form, is based on the antagonism of capital and wage labour. Let us examine both sides of this antagonism.

To be a capitalist, is to have not only a purely personal, but a social status in production. Capital is a collective product, and only by the united action of many members, nay, in the last resort, only by the united action of all members of society, can it be set in motion.

Capital is therefore not only personal; it is a social power.

When, therefore, capital is converted into common property, into the property of all members of society, personal property is not thereby transformed into social property. It is only the social character of the property that is changed. It loses its class character.