>Brits are this delusional

>>66291200
>55%
Holy shit and you're calling us delusional you literal cucks, you're still salty about the Japs sinking your boats.

Fun Fact: Germany (the people who started the war) surrendered before you dropped the bombs on the chinks, you mercilessly slaughtering 200,000 innocent civilians didn't "end the war".

>>66291474


VE day didn't end WWII, just the European Theater.

File: wot.png (8KB, 83x32px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 83x32px

dafuq ?

>>66291200
>>66291474
But it was Canada that beat the nazis.

All of those countries couldn't have won without the others help.

>>66291200
Wtf I love norway now

>>66291200
Based Norway

File: 1472249919865.jpg (61KB, 1000x800px) Image search: [Google]

61KB, 1000x800px

>>66291200
Better than expected from the other non-British countries.

France should have UK higher all things considered but as a rule I always expect the worst of France and that's exactly what I got

Friendship ended with France now Norway is my best friend

>>66291200
It should be more like;
>Whole Europe and USA being that delusional

Without Soviet Union, Germany would won the war without any problems.

>>66292168
Nah, every country was needed for the victory.

Hey UK ;)

>>66292168
>Without Soviet Union, Germany would won the war without any problems.

Germany didn't invade USSR until they had already failed at the Battle of Britain so I don't think that's remotely true. If you were right, the Germans should have been able to beat us when we were isolated, before USSR or USA militaries were involved and before lend lease

>>66291200
Seriously these poll must be bullshit. It's middle school curriculum that the soviets did most of the fighting. They propably asked it in such a way that it seemed to ask which country helped you the most during WW2.

>>66292219
Soviet Union made the biggest contribution. And that contribution was made by blood. If they were acting lilke French, their losses would be much much more less.

>>66291474
>he thinks a "World War" entirely took place within 200 miles of of his rainy shitrock
It should be illegal to teach this much anglo propaganda in British schools

>>66292168
>because millions of Russians died thanks to their own shitty country not valuing their lives and total strategic and military incompetence, they contributed the most to victory
The cold defeated Germany on the Eastern Front, not the insentient cannon fodder

>>66292382
It is related with UK being an island nation, it is completely irrelevant with contribution to their defeat. Maybe war would go on, but without Soviet Union, Allies would NEVER be able to defeat Germany.

>>66291200
like everyone else not considerenig USSR

>>66292518
>It is related with UK being an island nation
Actually it's more about the air forces. Battle of Britain was aerial warfare.

>it is completely irrelevant with contribution to their defeat.
It was a massive blow to the Luffwaffe. They lost thousands of planes, loads of pilots, and took a big hit to morale.

>>66291200
>People refusing to acknowledge it was all Russia
top kek

America only entered the war after it turned.

>>66292476
>The cold defeated Germany on the Eastern Front, not the insentient cannon fodde
This cannon fodde is tolerant to cold unlike Germans? You are retarded?

US is that cunt who doesn't attack anyone in 1v1v1 matches and let two sides kill eachother while he rushes the best techs and builds a fuckhuge army and still has the audacity to brag

and all those countries are delusional because the soviets won the fucking war

File: Norway new bae.png (43KB, 779x727px) Image search: [Google]

43KB, 779x727px

>>66292283

>>66291474
>Germany and Japan surrendered at the same time
>Thinking world war 2 only involved Europe
>Bong education
I am looking forward to you guys having one TV show that does not bring up 'muh trenches' or 'muh battle of britian', even your period pieces sneak it in somehow

Also whats up with all these Allied countries having no idea where they got all their Tanks/Planes/Oil/Food/Jeeps/Guns/Bullets/Ships to even fight the Axis

Ta тa тaтaтa тa тa тaтa

>Butt blasted yank cant let the last thread go

I really hope you're not the one who keeps using "churchillian"

>>66291474
t. Hans

Am I being rused, or /int/ really believe the propaganda they took in their schools? The war was between Soviet Union-Germany. All the rest seems insignificant compared with it.

File: big xi and big dave.jpg (51KB, 600x338px) Image search: [Google]

51KB, 600x338px

>>66292934
I can imagine sitting there watching British documentary because the American ones are too shit and getting progressively more angry throughout the programme.

The Battle of Britain was a "turning point"?! GRRRR I must showcase my anger on /int/! The anons must know!

>>66293067
USA movies man

File: Yank tries to explain.png (799KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

799KB, 1280x720px

>>66291200
>making this same thread multiple times
>image.png
>Yank

why are (((phone posters))) such cancer?

>>66292596
A big reason the battle of Britain was a huge defeat for Germany was Hitler's stupid idea to bomb civilians. It Hardened the UKs resolve to fight to the last man, but more importantly civilian casualties do nothing to hinder the war effort in your enemy, bombing factories or shipyards would have had a much more lasting impact.

I am not trying to take away from your victory, but Germany had you by the ropes and this fooling mistake on their part gave you an opening for victory.

This thread again

>>66293221
They were originally bombing factories, shipyards etc. They switched to civilians because they realised they couldn't suppress British industrial capacity just with the bombing and the bombers didn't have enough range.

Anyway it's well-document that Germany did *not* have us on the ropes and weren't even close. The British government of the time over-estimate German strength and British weakness due to bad information.

I posted evidence for this from historians in the last thread so you can check back there

>>66293358
>well-document
well-documented*

>>66292934
>even your period pieces sneak it in somehow
>British shows talk about British history
WEW lads someone call the bobs

>>66293358
this
Germany was never close to even taking out the RAF, let alone even close to enough radar stations and even with air-cover they could have been hard pressed to even make it across the channel since the Royal Navy would be out in force to stop them at any cost.

>>66293494
>British shows talk about British history

It's an outrage. Personally, I blame the Chinese and the weak Renminbi.

File: Canada.jpg (80KB, 971x551px) Image search: [Google]

80KB, 971x551px

At least post the real fucking poll results

Saying Britian contributed most to the allied victory is just laughable.

It was Russia. Paid with the blood of millions and millions of Russians

>>66293746
Yes, US was the big dog against Japan and Soviets in Europe.

>>66293702
The Canadian has the right of it

>>66293784
USA did the bulk of the fighting in the Pacific but the Japs surrendered because of the Soviets, not the bombs

>>66293784
>Japs surrendered because of the Soviets
Without an American invasion of western Europe all of Europe would have been sacked by Stalin

Soviet Union > USA > UK
Though without the UK holdout and staging grounds, most of mainland Europe would have been liberated by a bunch of commies, a fate almost worse than Nazi rule.

>>66294021
the UK did way more than the USA
even the Bomb was largely built off of British work.

>>66294021
Without what the Royal Navy and RAF did in the first few years of the war, the US wouldn't have had any of our tried and tested methods, technologies or success to steal and build on. Also in terms of sheer military attrition, the US couldn't have come into the European theatre like it did without the Royal Navy and RAF already having badly hurt the German and Italian militaries

File: 1472941892360.jpg (243KB, 668x407px) Image search: [Google]

243KB, 668x407px

>>66294021
Soviets>British empire>USA>meme allies>partisans

The US is overestimated in WWII and their contributions underestimated in WWI

For example in the Pacific Theatre.

It's the British experience at the hands of the Japanese navy which showed the Americans the weakness of battleships and the importance of aircraft carriers. Their naval strategy in the Pacific was formed based almost entirely on the British experience of being surprised by the Japanese and losing some battles.

The difference being that the Royal Navy was trying to fight 3 pretty powerful navies (German, Italian and Japanese) at the same time while the Americans (with lots more resources) focused mostly on the Japanese

>>66294219
What is the flag on left bottom?

USA > USSR > France > Germany's own incompetence > UK > various allies

>>66294219
>dutch not included on the right hand side of the picture
Their navy gave the japanese perfectly good target practice. Show some respect.

File: CP-Normandy-Landings[1].png (62KB, 1123x733px) Image search: [Google]

62KB, 1123x733px

>>66293980
>an American invasion

Ah yes

>>66294418
I mostly agree with you, but that's a bit of nationalist propaganda. It was the losses by the combined ABDA fleet (Australia, Britain, Dutch, America) against the Japs that taught those lessons, not just British losses.

Problem is that Britain counts everyone under their command as British, it's been a problem of their's for years. If the commodore in charge of of a multinational fleet, or especially commonwealth fleet, happens to be British the Brits pretend the whole thing was their effort.

>>66294631
Oops, never mind they are.

>>66294643
Britain gets to take credit for everything Canada does in the war btw, so we actually did 3/5 of the work on dday.

>>66294663
Sorry, should have said "British Empire" forces. It was mostly the Royal Navy though.

>It was the losses by the combined ABDA fleet
No. I'm not talking about the ABDA fleet. That actually happened later.

The first wave of Japanese attacks was in 1941. For example,

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sinking_of_Prince_of_Wales_and_Repulse

anglos overgoing eachother with delusion, wonder hos a history lesson for you guys look like

>implying it wasn't the Soviets

>>66294643
This, the Americans had by far the easiest beachhead at Utah and Omaha only went so bad because of American incompetence with their landing craft. They also didn't meet all their goals on D-day and didn't make it as far inland as others.

Anerica's biggest contribution to D-day was successfully tricking the Germans with Patton's "invasion force" aimed at Calais.

no one giving our comrades the credit they deserve

File: Trafalgar_Square_Christmas_tree3[1].jpg (811KB, 800x600px) Image search: [Google]

811KB, 800x600px

>>66294817
Pipe down, Norway.

Go and select a nice Christmas tree for this year's delivery, there's a good lad.

>>66294970
I think Soviets were the most important of the allies in WW2 although all 3 were indispensable. However I think everyone on here knows that Soviets were very important but the British contributed is underrated

>>66291200
>55%
>americucks are this delusional

You did almost nothing the entire war. What the fuck do they teach you over there.

>>66295042
>but the British contributed
contribution

>>66294709
Canadians did well in the world wars, as did Aussies. PM David Lloyd George told his biographer that it was his intention to replace the Earl of Haig with Aurthur Currie and with Monash as his chief of staff.
Basically the British PM wanted to put a Canadian and Australian in command of the empire's entire western front in WWI.

You can't take credit for that

>>66295042
Neither British or American contribution is underrated anywhere but perhaps Russia. The Cold War made sure of that.

>>66295047
The same thing they teach them about WWI, that America saved Europe from itself.

Read up itt, Americans unironically think they were the only country involved in programs like lend-lease, and they think selling materials and arms for self-benefit was the most substantial contribution to the war effort and won it all.

>>66294817
Norway I thought you were our bros >>66291200

>>66295147
British and Commonwealth contributions are certainly underrated in primary and secondary education in the US. They take a great deal of the credit for themselves and a man like based Montgomery is a figure of ridicule.

>>66295117
He was memeing you m8. Brits know all about the Canadian and other Commonwealth efforts. There's a lot of respect for Canada. We've had a Canadian be Prime Minister of the UK, and the current Governor of the Bank of England is a Canadian. I think that shows more respect than anything anyone can say.

>>66295147
British contribution is underrated everywhere but Norway it seems. I mean look at France in the OP. Lots of Brits died in France at the beginning and came back to die in France at the end. Cold War is all about US vs USSR in most peoples' minds, the British element became forgotten in most places.

I'm surprised that USSR is so low in that chart in countries that couldn't vote for themselves. In the UK, we're taught that the Soviet contribution was hugely important and the Eastern Front is where the shit went down. But obviously in a poll like this we'd be more likely to vote for ourselves.

>>66295332
Northern Ireland's brave Bernard Montgomery saving the empire and the English unironically think we don't contribute.

>>66292130
you were pretty much useless desu, usa and ussr got this easily

>>66295477
>france commenting on uselessness

File: camhol.jpg (341KB, 2000x1000px) Image search: [Google]

341KB, 2000x1000px

>>66295477
This is what happens when you give the French command of your expeditionary forces. They lose and then the French blame you.

Good luck with the EU Army btw

>>66295531
we got a perfect example to look at up north

File: 1475311787576.jpg (56KB, 960x480px) Image search: [Google]

56KB, 960x480px

All the Soviets did was die in wave after wave, the Yanks did nothing but murder Jan civilians. Do retards in foreign countries not learn anything about Alan Turing?

>>66295581
>expeditionary forces

30K? lol

>>66295619
Jap civilians*

>>66295374
I think 15% of the French believing the UK contributed more than the Soviets are a vast overestimation of the British war effort. Cold War is still the reason why the numbers are so skewed. Literally 90% of German soldiers died on the Eastern Front, it's a ridiculous argument.

>>66295619
thanks to alan turing for building all those soviet tanks

>>66295671
indeed it should be 0%

how can the brits even dare to be shocked by this?

File: original.jpg (127KB, 1271x854px) Image search: [Google]

127KB, 1271x854px

>>66295477

File: 1249241193097[1].jpg (40KB, 500x313px) Image search: [Google]

40KB, 500x313px

>>66295619
Osborne's ":D" laugh in the top left is the best one in that pic

>>66295764
>a leaf trying to make a point

File: 1280px-Norwegian_Stone_Hyde_Park_detail[1].jpg (300KB, 1280x960px) Image search: [Google]

300KB, 1280x960px

>>66295671
If you're already done choosing the tree, we'll have another rock please.

>>66295581
And then bitch at you for evacuating, even though 40% of the people you evacuated were French.

Eternal anglo's lies

They also think that they were the most strong allied force in 1917-1918

>>66295878
>During the war there were three distinct British Armies. The 'first' army was the small volunteer force of about 400,000 soldiers (comprising the Regular Army of 247,000[50] and Territorial Force of 145,000[51]), over half of which were posted overseas to garrison the British Empire. This total included the Regular Army and reservists in the Territorial Force. Together they formed the BEF, for service in France and became known as the Old Contemptibles. The 'second' army was Kitchener's Army, formed from the volunteers in 1914–1915, which was destined to go into action at the Battle of the Somme.[52] The 'third' was formed after the introduction of conscription in January 1916 and by the end of 1918 the British Army had reached its peak of strength of four million men and could field over seventy divisions.[50]

So by 1918...
>peak of strength of four million men and could field over seventy divisions.[50]

Britain was probably the strongest, because we had the biggest army in the world (4 million) and biggest navy in the world, and the world's first independent air force the RAF.

>>66295878
Because we were.

File: 1475784812853.png (67KB, 338x356px) Image search: [Google]

67KB, 338x356px

Contribution by Britan ? Become sissyboy for US ?

>>66295878
Come to think of it, the fact the Britain went to war with the Soviets straight after WW1 was finished and secured the independence of Lativa and Estonia...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/British_campaign_in_the_Baltic_(1918%E2%80%9319)

... kind of proves it

File: 1476477044766.jpg (190KB, 563x563px) Image search: [Google]

190KB, 563x563px

>>66296399
Why do people never just thank us for being the objective good guys?

>>66291200
I unironically believe this narrative 2bh. Only contenders are the Russians in my mind.

AMA

File: le plan directeur.jpg (415KB, 700x1000px) Image search: [Google]

415KB, 700x1000px

>>66296497
Because we're the hero Europe deserves, but not the one it needs right now, so they'll hate us. Because we can take it, because Britain's not a hero. We're a silent guardian, a watchful protector...

... a Dark Knight.

>>66296528
to whom do you fault this delusion?

File: 1476616371863.jpg (84KB, 800x575px) Image search: [Google]

84KB, 800x575px

>>66296599
>>66296497

>>66296677
we literally did though. prove me wrong: pro-tip you cant

>>66296745
Destroying the aryan race seems like something a good guy would do 2bh.

File: bomber harris.webm (3MB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 1280x720px

>>66296745

File: dresden.webm (3MB, 640x360px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 640x360px

>>66296745
E

>>66296677
I also just noticed your flag,
thank you based norway for recognising our contribution :3

File: BjLOoUmIgAENHWB.jpg (72KB, 600x386px) Image search: [Google]

72KB, 600x386px

Do Russians have feelings?

File: World-War-II-military-deaths-in-Europe-by-theater-year[1].png (239KB, 1220x1116px) Image search: [Google]

239KB, 1220x1116px

I cannot understand this. How dare you steal our victory? Even if western countries didn't assist us we anyway would win but later.

File: too black.jpg (35KB, 300x300px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 300x300px

>>66297313
>wars are won by dying as much as possible

>>66296994
I hate you. Is this a feeling?

File: 23es.jpg (78KB, 326x432px) Image search: [Google]

78KB, 326x432px

>>66297313
Bet you thought you could just take finland :D:D: hjahaha

>>66297313
and why the fuck is finland red? You didn't front shit on us lul
GET THE FUCK outta here :D:D

File: 1473908472447.jpg (45KB, 420x420px) Image search: [Google]

45KB, 420x420px

>>66291200
>Britshits arguing about WW2
How cute.

>>66297455
>wars are won by staying on our island faffing about

File: 1473379656866.jpg (509KB, 1680x1114px) Image search: [Google]

509KB, 1680x1114px

>>66297313
How about you post the real one?

>>66297455
Compare axis' death in western and eastern front you moron

File: 130179360021.jpg (63KB, 506x506px) Image search: [Google]

63KB, 506x506px

>>66297688
compare russian death to finns ayy lmao GET THE FUCK OUT :D:D:

>>66297650
It's about nazis casualites.
source https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eastern_Front_(World_War_II)

>>66292283
wtfI love Norway now.

>>66292550
I would put USSR second after Austria, Hitler was so incompetent as a strategist that he hindered Germany the most.

>>66297810
I don't give a fuck about finns death. We are talking about contribution of USSR/other countries in the victory. My point is it's incomparable

>>66297991
Get the fuck out son. You were literally worse than nazis :D:D:

File: britain during ww2.png (273KB, 1536x1477px) Image search: [Google]

273KB, 1536x1477px

>>66297624
>staying on our island faffing about

Ah yes

>>66294097
*irish

>>66298021
If we were you wouldn't exist.

>>66293702
Canada didn't do shit.

>>66297991
>>66297688
I said earlier in the thread that I think Soviets made the biggest contribution to WW2 out of the allies.

Don't get your knickers in a twist. I do think that, but posting a chart showing deaths in a post talking about WINNING is just stupid

>>66298044
>how to avoid the krauts for 5 years: the complete guide
well done

>>66298124
more than the USA

>>66298143
>germans soldiers being killed did not win the war
?

File: finland.gif (1MB, 274x206px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 274x206px

>>66298107
You were and you failed.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Molotov%E2%80%93Ribbentrop_Pact
GET THE FUCK OUT SONNN ::DD

>>66298198
Killing 10,000 Hitler youth and old people is less important than cracking the Enigma code, or denying access to a certain strategic port, or bombing an important factory. How old are you?

>>66298143
Allies were a fucking joke. We dindu nuffin and you fuckers left us to the soviets.
Thanks to Saruman tho, only based brit around.

File: 1433936844532.webm (526KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

526KB, 1920x1080px

>>66298364
You guys should have had a treaty with us then. Like Poland ;)

>>66298143
1. I glad to hear that such people exist. But according with the op pic you are minority in Europe and us
2. To win in such wars you had to kill the enemy soldiers. Otherwise they will kill you. It's a simple logic. Therefore, one of the objective criterion to understand who contribute most to the defeat nazis is amount of killed nazis.

>>66298328
>10.000
That was the number russkies killed on a good day you fucking idiot

File: 1443376488651.gif (2MB, 320x200px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 320x200px

>>66298448
Yeah poland sure stroke a bargain with that deal.

>>66298237
>Ribbentrop
>tfw he used to meme on him until he pulled a tantrum then nicknamed him Ribbenstrop

>>66298509
Not him, but that was the joke. Besides you didn't see how much we "helped" Norway in Telemark

>>66291200
Anyone who mentions anything other than Soviet Union is retarded

>inb4 nuked the nips
The map specifcally mentions the defeat of Germany

>>66298488
The intelligence and naval and aerial aspects are pretty damn important despite killing less Nazis directly. British intelligence shared with Soviets allowed you to kill a lot more during the war.

Anyway it is true that killing lots of Nazis is also important and that's one of the reason I say you were the biggest Allied contributor. When you posted that chart I thought it was about Soviet deaths at first because that chart is posted a lot and people who post it always talk about how "Russians died the most therefore x and y"

Then you explained it was about Nazi deaths so I attempted some damage control

>>66295477
Thank you greatest ally.

>>66298237
We wanted only to protect Leningrad from your pro-nazis government. Because of you more than million Leningrad residents were died due to blocade.
you should be ashamed

>>66298715
Yes, I agree with you in everything. Intelligence, air, lend lease and so on it's important but ground operations are the decisive factor.

>>66298488

In the past I have seen people referencing this as "the biggest theft in history".

But yeah, this sort of history rewriting is what you could expect after all the indoctrination during and after Cold War.

File: 1466535472927.jpg (562KB, 964x1258px) Image search: [Google]

562KB, 964x1258px

>500,000 Brits died under the guise that their people and culture would be extinguished under nazi occupation
>less than a century later, native Brits are a minority within their own capitol city with many British neighborhoods and subcultures completely destroyed

wew lad almost like it was all for nothing

>>66298124
>American education

>>66298874
Nice paranoia and sounds to me you let them die. :^)

>>66299243
It's a shame we're not allies any more. Communism was awful but now you're not commies any more there's less of a barrier to it.

In the past, nearly every single time Britain and Russia were allied, we always won. Against powerful countries too.

File: PicsArt_07-25-10.09.10.jpg (131KB, 860x698px) Image search: [Google]

131KB, 860x698px

>>66296497

File: le exasperated green frog.jpg (11KB, 247x242px) Image search: [Google]

11KB, 247x242px

>>66299541
>capitol city

>>66299600
Strong powers will always compete with each other for resources. Our people can be very friendly toward one another because we share common values but our governments will be enemies (except when we have a common enemy).

But I hope I'm wrong.

>>66300443
>Strong powers will always compete with each other for resources.
Yes.. but what resources are we competing for? Nothing really. Our governments are enemies because of the eastern Europe defence situation (mostly via NATO) and that's about it. That's diplomacy it can be resolved.

>nobody acknowledges it was Russia

the fucking state of [any country] education

>>66295619
Who was helped by several very good polish matematics. Not meming

>>66299611
People who are us only living in a slightly different country don't really count m8.

File: Pepe_de_Quebec.jpg (28KB, 400x400px) Image search: [Google]

28KB, 400x400px

>>66303488
>people who are us

Fermé ta gueule rosbif

>>66304978
Do you know what the French did to people who weren't French in their country/territories. They forced them to be French or drove them out or killed them.

I wonder why we were so nice

File: 1473795428636.jpg (193KB, 650x434px) Image search: [Google]

193KB, 650x434px

>>66305429
>so nice

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Expulsion_of_the_Acadians

Brits literally forced Acadians to either become loyal colonial britishers or you shipped them to the U.S. South (a fate worse than death pêh)

>>66304978
Quebec is a meme stop pretending.

>>66306110
And yet there you are, speaking your French and posting your meme frogs

>>66299541
Bottom picture looks more orderly

>>66306314
We were just too damn nice, really came back to bite us. Can't run an empire through niceness.

File: 1471063747160.webm (340KB, 378x312px) Image search: [Google]

340KB, 378x312px

>>66306314
Under an Anglo queen

>50% of our country are unpatriotic niggers

I can only apologise for them Mr American

>makes the same thread 2 days in a row
>first day is actual discussion about the war
>second day is entirely shitposting and menes

why did you do this again?

File: Québecois_BTFO_Hon.jpg (527KB, 1892x1494px) Image search: [Google]

527KB, 1892x1494px

>>66306804
There was some good discussion itt earlier, you just have to filter out the french and quebecers

File: Quebec will literally never recover.jpg (142KB, 800x1052px) Image search: [Google]

142KB, 800x1052px

>>66306657

>arguing who had the biggest role in destroying europe and helping communists rape the world
Might as well argue who was the biggest cuck.

>>66306941
I didnt read the thread apart from the first and last 20 posts, so apologies if I missed something worthwhile

also >>66299611
:3

File: canada.png (266KB, 630x532px) Image search: [Google]

266KB, 630x532px

>>66298124
They did well for their size desu

File: Smug kot.jpg (10KB, 211x212px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 211x212px

>>66291474
>Japanese army base
>Explosive munitions factories
>Major ports
>Japanese veteran air units re-stationed near Nagasaki because of its military significance
>Still thinking the bombs were merely to kill civilians
>Civilians that would have died anyway had an invasion happened, or if we had signed Japan's "Peace" treaty in which they demanded amnesty for their war crimes and retaining control over conquered territory to continue said crimes
>Inb4 links to the institute for historical review

Curtis LeMay did nothing wrong. You as a bong are just salty that you didn't get the biggest slice of the action in the Pacific.
>Japan BTFO
>Gets revenge by infecting western society with kawaii uguu bullshit

>>66293702
>>66298124
Canadian units were well-respected within commonwealth forces. Canucks are our bros.

>>66298107
The Soviet Union would have collapsed if it were not for the US and UK sending them shitloads of supplies. You adored our equipment as well, Vatnik. Your second top ace, Pokryshkin, flew a P-39. your tankers preferred M4 Shermans over T-34s because of how reliable they were, even noting how they "never broke down". Even Zhukov admitted that the sheer number of trucks that the US sent the USSR helped immensely.

>>66291200
>coutnry

so this is made up, right? whats the point? why not just exaggerate the statistics a little more if youre going to lie

>>66292476
>>66292934
>>66308314
Between all of the nations in Europe (including the Soviet Union), there were about 50-60 million deaths, approximately 30 million of which were directly as a result of military action.

Between Japan and the US there were just under 3 million military deaths.

WOW you Americans sure did have a super involved war over there in the Pacific, tell me again how the majority of the combat wasn't in Europe, really makes you look smart and played a significant role in history.

wait wait wait let me just go on google for a quick second

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_World_War_II_battles
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_World_War_II_battles_involving_the_United_States

WOW AMERICA THANK YOU FOR YOUR SERVICE I hadn't realised how crucial you were in aiding us with the war, this really puts it all in perspective, huh?

File: Pod of whales washes up on Normandy beach.jpg (142KB, 891x643px) Image search: [Google]

142KB, 891x643px

>>66309170

>>66309170
D E S T R O Y E D