is this good?

What's the point of this thread? Fuck off.

>>3096568
The point is in the subject, why are you so hostile?

>>3096565
Kinda.

Thank you for consulting /ic/, if you have any comlaints about the quality of our services, please send them in the form of a prayer to God at your local church.

>>3096565
It look like Hong Kong. That's a point.

>>3096565
Of course it's good WHAT THE FUCK
HELLO DO YOU EVEN HAVE EYES, OF COURSE IT'S GOOD J
UST LOOK AT IT MAN
LOOK LOOOOOK LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOK GOD DAMN IT
LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO-

my guess: OP is retarded and didn't realise the street was sloped (maybe he doesn't know about those since he lives in basement?) and so incorrectly thought they sucked at perspective.

>>3096565
You tell me faggot.
>There is no physical limit to how many dicks OP can ram into it's body.

File: jif.gif (499KB, 480x228px) Image search: [Google]

499KB, 480x228px

>>3096565
While OP's busy shitposting I'm out here improving

I think some of the figures are out of perspective, guys walking in to the building on the left look like midgets compared to the ones on the road, could just be an optical illusion.

File: opuepf819wdl41nu4tny-tile.jpg (389KB, 1600x792px) Image search: [Google]

389KB, 1600x792px

sure is better than this.
even despite serving different purposes.

>>3097945
Top right is really, really good.

File: Ghost-in-the-Shell envio1.jpg (118KB, 1280x688px) Image search: [Google]

118KB, 1280x688px

>>3097951
>bunch of pictures slapped together presenting no actual concept
>you can't even tell the focus point of the image
>might be the bridge,wtf,don't want to believe that


you say it's really really good in the sense that you can look up some pictures of present day hong kong and they will also be really really good as in visually pleasing

>>3097959
I mean I could see top right as good composition shot for a movie scene. Try to imagine a person running through the bridge, that would be alright. I can see why as a standalone piece it's not good composition-wise though.