Subcompact car pen drawing from imagination Give feedback please

File: image.jpg (154KB, 1044x812px) Image search: [Google]

154KB, 1044x812px

Interesting rocky method of representation. Needs more foreground and/or background to set the tone.

>>2972228
Thank you anon

Where's your construction lines? It looks flat. Try to 3D it up a bit

>>2972288
Thank you fir yoir feedback

To answer your question literally there was no construction, just imaginary contour drawing, but I will consider implying some construction if i shade with hatching

You obviously have a little bit of anatomical understanding, but you are stylizing that understanding very poorly. I'm assuming you generally do academic studies and are just recently trying to branch out into stylization? Very few of your stylistic exaggerations look like they're done with informed intent of how it changes the read and feel of a drawing compared to if it were just a realistic study. It looks like you just sorta hyperbolized every single curve in the figure because you could. I would suggest getting more comfortable with anatomy before you try to stylize. I know it sounds counterintuitive, but anatomical knowledge is hella important for stylization. For example, your forearm is fairly convincing because despite it's stylized structure it still implies the presence of a brachioradialis through the way the elbow sits on the knee. (That being said if you changed the angle of it slightly so it looked like it inserts on the radial side of the hand it would be even more effective). The neck on the other hand is much less convincing because you don't seem as confident in the anatomy. You have a line suggesting the sternocletomastoid, but since that line runs parallel to the path of the neck instead of angling forward as it approaches the body to connect to the sternum and the clavicle it just looks unnerving and out of place