finally finished?

File: 1451941801150.png (152KB, 335x525px) Image search: [Google]

152KB, 335x525px

>>2963856
>putting signatures in studies
pathetic.

needs more anime

>>2963864
this is not a study

>>2963865
anime is not challenging enough for me..sorry. sticking to oils.

File: well.jpg (74KB, 720x480px) Image search: [Google]

74KB, 720x480px

>>2963866
>not considering this a study
even more PATHETIC

>>2963878
come again...this is a commission buddy, on bristol board.

>>2963889
I was asking myself
>who pays for this?

But then I took a closer look at your portrait and realized she probably has down syndrome. Poor girl.

>>2963897
not likely. At 3 its sold. its what they asked for

You have metalic, shiny values. You should do some material studies. Skin is more matte than you're indicating. Right now I can't really tell what all is in the shadow family, because a lot of your shadow(bounce light) is just as bright as your mid tones.

Also, you're drawing it as if it were planar. Give some indication of the gradual turning of form. Just slightly, subtly darken the values within the shadows to show form. Moreso in the mid tones, but make sure none of the mid tone values are as dark as the lightest (bounce light) shadow values.

What's the reference you used for this?

Eyes misaligned
Nose crooked
Chin too small
Ears too high
Poor hatching
Poor value distribution

These errors are not stylistic choices, but simply that; amateurish mistakes.

>>2963905
> its what they asked for
They asked you to make them look like a literal retard?

>>2963856
If you handle your tones, mapping and silhouettes well, the drawing should read well even from distance/with squinted eyes.

You drawing from distance reads as a fucking poltergeist, it's real creepy.

I can understand you not being able to draw well, but the hatching is just downright lazy. I'd feel ashamed for putting this little effort into something and then charging actual money for it.

File: 2017-05-02 11.08.57.jpg (188KB, 400x710px) Image search: [Google]

188KB, 400x710px

Needs more edge variety, and better value control.

>>2964046
thanks for the shit storm

>>2964064
Shit storm? What do you mean?

File: 1492175737216.jpg (71KB, 262x296px) Image search: [Google]

71KB, 262x296px

>>2963856

>/beg

>>2964075
newfag
this is illastrat
every criticism of the "best artist ever" is racist and mean to him
just ignore his threads

>>2963856
I can't really tell where she was supposed to be punched, but good bruises

>>2964111
What..? I'm not following.

File: measure.jpg (166KB, 720x960px) Image search: [Google]

166KB, 720x960px

>>2963856

File: 1451035033880.jpg (30KB, 533x388px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 533x388px

>>2963889
>SOMEBODY PAID FOR THIS
HAHAHAHAAHAHAHAAH i dont know if i should be surprised or not hahahaha how much did you get 5 dollars? hahahahaha

>>2964212
And how much do you get paid for your commissions?

>>2964131
How OP managed to actually miss this is impressive.

>>2963856
>illastrat
Screw the haters! I think this is a beautiful drawing of a burn victim.The face is so fucked up it's unrecognizable. Good job!

>>2963913
Burn victim with down syndrome.

>>2963866
>this is not a study
yeah......cuz it's fucking trash.

>>2963913
Yes, what's the reference