general /ic/ related webm thread? post people making art.

>>2963483
degenerate here, sauce pls

>>2963483
I always enjoy watching the workflow of others desu.

>>2963553
Seconding this

k.

this kind of shit is super helpful for me

its great to see how other people break things down and put them back together.

>>2963483

Is there a name for this kind of furry style that have short stubby noses that doesn't look quite as animalistic as those with longer snouts? I would imagine many furries consider this normie tier but it's a little more digestable for me who isn't one

>>2963611
It's called "kemono"

File: tumblr_ofk1arStL01qcsc7lo1_1280.jpg (209KB, 1280x1280px) Image search: [Google]

209KB, 1280x1280px

>>2963611
it's called kemono, it's the japanese style to drawing anthro.
Not neccessarily shorter snouts but the aethestics are similar.

>>2963613
>>2963612
fucking cringe

>>2963612
>>2963613

Cool, thanks. Are they usually depicted with plantigrade feet aswell? From the little I know about furries it seems that the more hardcore ones don't consider it to be "real" furry unless they have a digitigrade posture

>>2963621
nope plantigrade feet just mean more feral, still considered furry, anyone who tells you otherwise is an elitist furfag.

kemono can have both human feet and plantigrade feet depends on the artist.

>>2963619
kys

>>2963633

I see, think you mean digitgrade though. Humans have plantigrade feet. So it's basically a scale between anthro and feral where anthro is more human looking and the further you go towards feral the more animal looking the character is right? I've done some furry commissions but I'm not 100% with the lingo yet

>>2963642
oh yeah that's what I meant.

>>2963553
>>2963593
looks like kikurage
@suolan on twitter

>>2963612
>>2963613
100% sure it's called Furry shit

>>2963553
obviously Kikurage

/our_boy/ Simon has a few in his twitter
https://twitter.com/simon_7617118/status/857923485129203716
I can't be arsed into converting it to webm tho

>>2963885
this guy's style is shit

File: simon.png (2MB, 1100x1400px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1100x1400px

>>2964525
post your work then.

File: a.webm (2MB, 282x320px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 282x320px

>>2963885

File: 2.webm (2MB, 566x640px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 566x640px

>>2966720
Here's another

>>2964533
it's funny how characters that are probably the same age as the ones in anime become gross as hell when you change the art style a little bit.

>>2966720
teal line san!?

>you'll never be as good as kikurage

>>2966974
>>2966975
>>2966977
how the fuck can the japanese draw so good

>>2966974
Thank goodness he censored it.

>>2967016
>mfw watching furry porn webms

File: file.png (15KB, 188x194px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 188x194px

>>2966977
fucking plot twist

>>2966994
how the fuck are furry artists so good?

>>2967110
m8....

https://www.reddit.com/r/FurryArtSchool/

>>2966978
learn to write in japanese

File: dog.jpg (31KB, 480x460px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 480x460px

>>2967119
yikes!

File: picture.png (95KB, 249x153px) Image search: [Google]

95KB, 249x153px

>>2966994

>>2966994
>HAAAAHAHAHAH-Oh....

>>2967119
this improved my perception of /ic/, it could be so much worse

>>2966994
Is that abubu?

>>2967192
like cream

>>2966984
I like how he didn't draw the other foot until like 5 phases later.

>>2966985
>webm loops seamlessly
damn...

>>2967119
Oh hey I love drawing fur let's check this o-
Oh.

>>2966978
They learn with an unreleased Loomis book

File: 1477887058153.jpg (121KB, 641x720px) Image search: [Google]

121KB, 641x720px

>>2967192

>>2967110
They're not. You just like their motives.

>>2966977
>>2966981
>>2966982
I recognize this artist.
I don't know why but he deleted a vast majority of his works in Pixiv.

>>2966994
SAUCE

>>2967543
I'll never understand why they do this

>>2967556
It makes sense if it's against the rules/guidelines but when even more weirder or gross shit is there it's hard to tell why they do it.
It's even more annoying as fuck when they, instead of deleting it, privates it. So the only way to access it is by "befriending" them or by luck having it saved.

>>2967288
Yes.

>>2967543
Hm?
Its all in there.
https://www.pixiv.net/member_illust.php?id=10420062
https://www.pixiv.net/member_illust.php?id=6669600

>>2967654
Oh looks like he made another for guro stuff. In any case, a lot of Pixiv artist tend to do what I said.

>>2966987
I'm gonna have to start trying this method of lining my work.

>>2966974
Fuck off, pedophile

>>2966994
Stop breaking the rules god damn it

>>2967110
I'm a fucking furry and that is shit.

>>2968036
post your art

>>2963726

got me

>>2967890
>>2967899
Imagine being the queer that actually says shit like this.

>>2968225
>if ur not a pedophile degenerate, ur a queer
Imagine being that pathetic

>>2967654
i wanna make a pixiv (mostly to follow) but im shit
should i just man up anyways or wait a bit?

File: 1493615481559.png (272KB, 363x518px) Image search: [Google]

272KB, 363x518px

>>2968263
Are you afraid of being judged by other artists?

Don't worry, the rest of the internet isn't /ic/. Most people are nice.

That particular artist followed me back after I talked to him on twitter and I'm not very good.

>>2968263
At the end of the day it's your decision but looking at it from a consumer perspective the main thing that is killing Pixiv is shitty art from western DeviantArt-rejects.

>>2968493
>that is killing Pixiv is shitty art from western DeviantArt-rejects.
that's what i fear doing

>>2968277
>Are you afraid of being judged by other artists?
a bit, not as much as above

>Don't worry, the rest of the internet isn't /ic/. Most people are nice.
>That particular artist followed me back after I talked to him on twitter and I'm not very good.
that's quite admirable and motivating. internet friendships always seemed for foreign to me. especially with a senpai

>>2968499
>that's what i fear doing
If you're conscious about it it shouldn't be an issue. People who are amateur are best but working hard to improve are not the problem, the problem are the kids posting dodge/burn tool sonic/MLP/furry OCs.

File: 01.webm (2MB, 600x480px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 600x480px

>>2963483
I still have the webms of these that I saved from /ic/ about two years ago, anyone want me to upload them?

>>2968538
yea

>>2968538
I would like that

File: 02.webm (2MB, 600x480px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 600x480px

>>2968564
>>2968566
https://dropfile.to/QfgNMWb

Expires in 24 hours, if you know of a usable and permanent file host, please reupload them there because I cba recovering my mega account right now.

>>2968577
thanks m8

>>2968577
Good shit, thank you anon

>>2968577
Thanks homie, gonna use this to encourage a friend of mine into this kemono stuff to keep drawing.

>>2968577
It's shit.

File: progress 2.gif (641KB, 350x389px) Image search: [Google]

641KB, 350x389px

>>2969056

>>2966974
>that fucked up anatomy

>>2969085
How do you even noticed that? Are you actively looking for mistakes?

I only ever notice mistakes when other people point them out.

>>2969090
It's blatantly obvious since it's next to the focal point

>>2969018
post your work

>>2967192
this is fucking sexy

>>2968225
Imagine being the queer who doesn't follow the global rule #3.

>>2969090
How are you ever gonna make it if you're not on the lookout for mistakes?

>>2969555
Because I started making money when I stopped overestimating people.
Almost no one has ever mentioned mistakes I have made, and noticed myself. It's like they care more about the idea than the execution.

>>2969557
>Because I started making money when I stopped overestimating people.
explain what you mean by this

>>2969190
>rulecuck thinks bans work
lmao, evading is so easy you little mod cocksucker

>>2969558
I was always worried and scared that customers would tear up my work up. That I would have an anatomy mistake that I didn't noticed. I used to grind my teeth out of stress (bruxism). I got ulcers. I internalized 4chan and /ic/, that the real world out there acts like us. The comments that you read here are brutal and honest.

I rejected jobs because I thought I would be "found out". No matter how much I planned and thumbnailed, something would slip through. Some perspective flaw. Some bad design. How could I accept money if my work had flaws?

But the number of artists out there that made it despite mistakes is huge. Like Jack Kirby who invented fake anatomy. Look up any popular artists, and if your eye is trained you'll see mistakes. So fucking what? Does that invalidates all the time and effort that went into the piece?. This isn't a surgery, nobody dies if you get something wrong.I thought, if so many can get away with it, why not me?

Whenever a mistake came up, it was only noticed by other artists. You have to realize that 90% of the population isn't visually or artistically trained. If they don't know anatomy, they won't be able to see the mistakes to begin with. If something is REALLY bad, they will feel like it looks off but they won't know why. Unlike in anonymous internet forums, people IRL are afraid of looking stupid or making enemies so they will just shrug it off instead of yelling "LOOMIS".

Worst case scenario I had to apologize and do a paint over. Turns out that this is very valuable in the art business. Most artists are snowflakes afraid to edit their work.

Look, I'm always on the look out for mistakes. But the average person can barely spot them and even if they do, they won't care if they like the idea. They'll defend something to death despite it's flaws if they can relate to the idea. So I went and livestreamed, painted in public. Did a lot of mistakes in front of people. Nobody cared when I fucked up. The real world isn't /ic/.

>>2969575
Thanks anon for this post, cheered me up actually. I hope to make it one day and stand along with you! This eased a lot of my fears, but the things you say make sense and I can believe them too.

>>2968577
Someone up this to mega.nz pls

>>2969575
/ic/ is fucking depressing, moslty just a huge focus on technical shit WITHOUT ACTUAL CREATIVITY
ppl do care more about the idea than the execution

>>2969056
What are the best brushes for blocking in while adding some texture as well ?
Hard round and soft are technically all your need, but they're fucking depressing.

>>2969597
Apparently any brush that isn't round is good for texture. It kind of depends on your taste, try stuff out, but using round won't give you a lot of textures.

>>2969597
>Hard round and soft are technically all your need, but they're fucking depressing.
Those are all you need for concept art. For anything else you need to get serious with brush customization. Download several brush packs from cgpeers, then modify as necessary.

File: 1494063501888.jpg (374KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

374KB, 1280x720px

>>2968577
>File will expire in 38 minutes.

>>2968577
>>2969582
>>2969765
https://mega.nz/#F!c15zgRyB!lSJyuB9SpwgrGnMrG1BVBQ

>>2969793
I was about to ask for a new upload and then you came

thx dude

>>2967206
underrated post

>>2969566
I just despise pedophiles, has nothing to do with love to authority. If the authority would do as they are supposed to, this would be nearly a degenerate-free board, at least what you could expect from a pink board.

>>2969575

this

we're like 200 years past art having to be realistic, dumbasses

>>2963685
>he only does fur shit now instead of his delicious loli

feels bad man.

>>2969056
>>2969057
>painting of portrait photographs of attractive asian women doing nothing
How much more basic can you get?

>>2966975
How do you manage to be such a good draftsman

and yet ruin you composition in the very last step

why

it hurts to watch

>>2966975

this is like how spongebob draws a circle

File: painting 2.webm (2MB, 854x480px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 854x480px

>>2967192
What are you faggots doing? Post webm's.

>>2972163
ty, when I find threads with nice refs I save them and wait until they get archived to save everything in them

>>2969575

Great post. I was honestly starting to lose hope for the future.

>>2972163

that censorship caught me off guard

>>2968226
>degenerate

Oh, so you're one of those kids

>>2972662
It has perfect comedic timing.

>>2972163
why is this still up

>>2974941
because it's educational

>>2974941
Can't you see it's censored?

>>2974941
why not?

>>2966978
thats krenz, not japanese

>>2972163
Censor or no censor, it's still loli. Loli is not allowed outside of /b/.

>>2976278
>triggered on 4chan

>>2976282
>pedophile
>anywhere

>>2976285
see that stick? the one up your butt? pull it out, anon.

>>2963483
does he make doujins in this furry style?

File: 1493944322379.webm (116KB, 600x422px) Image search: [Google]

116KB, 600x422px

>>2972163
Deleted again.

>>2968577
>drofile.to
oh the memories

>>2976298
LOL! gottim!

>>2976298
Pedophiles just really grind my gears since I'm not a nigger or a hillbilly.
>>2976660
I hope you get the message eventually.

>>2977302
I'll keep reposting it every time it gets deleted. I don't care what you or the hotpocket thinks. It belongs here.

>>2977302
>muh christian morals are too far up my ass to allow indecent drawings and complete artistic freedom

>>2977305
>hotpocket
yeah! fuck you mom and fuck the police too!

>>2967192
Is there a link to the full video?

>>2977566
There's no full video, only a less accelerated version
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FF5aAbCbLLk

>>2964533
looks like an improved version of shadman, but it's still reminiscent of shadman

File: 1463567157611.png (89KB, 895x931px) Image search: [Google]

89KB, 895x931px

>>2977316
I'm not a christian. Pedophilia is an illness and shouldn't be allowed in any way, shape or form.

>>2978470
And how do you plan to do that, by banning cartoons, the only relief they have that doesn't hurt anyone?
You only raise the risk that at some point they won't be able to control it anymore and actually hurt someone, wouldn't it be better for society to just let them fap that urge out of their body?

btw I don't like lolis, I just think your argument is weak.

>>2978470
what does pic related even have to do with this?

File: 1493846225073.jpg (26KB, 451x292px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 451x292px

Just post webms or let the thread die, you actual fucking retards

File: 56550356.webm (2MB, 700x414px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 700x414px

>>2978559
Blame the moral fag for derailing the thread with his autism.

File: 1493580076686.gif (996KB, 500x281px) Image search: [Google]

996KB, 500x281px

>>2978640
Hey, as long as you're posting webms, I like you better than the moralfag. Never die, lolianon.

File: 1379928467251.gif (3MB, 648x400px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 648x400px

Are gif allowed too?

>>2978682
no, because we can't pause them.

>>2978518
So if you don't watch porn you'll end up attacking a random woman? Stop being ridiculous.

>>2978518
it's more like a fetish. if it's gone, they'll go back to fapping to mature women.

>>2978470
Most of the information in your picture is doctored or are half-truths, for example the last study listed never actually collected data on the sexual preferences of the respondents, and had to produce a bogus 'bisexual' group in order to make it look like homosexuals molest significantly more than heteros, when the current existing data showed they were essentially equal. Additionally, the study was funded by people looking to push laws against homosexuals at the time...the study and its author have been endlessly criticized for having really bad methods, shit sample sizes, data appearing out of thin air with no explanation as to how he got the numbers, and publishing the conclusion they wanted to arrive at, in newspapers, before the research even finished, making all of the responses to his survey entirely invalid.

That isn't even getting started at your stupidity against loli, which also doesn't hold up to actual observations of reality, though I suspect you to just be a moron who hears what he wants to hear without ever fact-checking anyway, so my words are wasted. Try using your brain instead of emotions to form your opinions.

>>2978691
Amazing what range can be done in that small region of the color wheel.

>>2979062
Acting out pedophilia is child-abuse and rape, nothing will change that. The rules of the page clearly state that pedophilia, furfaggotry and gore belong in /b/.

>>2979792
>Acting out pedophilia is child-abuse and rape, nothing will change that.
Lolicon is as much acting out pedophilia as watching friday the 13th is acting out serial killing. Your premise is flawed, because there is actually no correlation to suggest that fiction causes people to commit real crimes. I suggest you take your time machine back to 1970, 1993 or 2001, where you can freely spread your bullshit about how metal turns people into satanists, doom turns people into baby murderers, and grand theft auto turns your children into gun crazed zombies.

>>2980153
Do you masturbate to the murders in Friday the 13th?

>>2967192
He makes it look easy!
>mirin that long-brush technique

>>2979922
D
Generate

>>2981520
If your arbitrary criteria for something to be a bad influence on people is masturbation, then you're still wrong. There is no data that so much as correlates having sexual fantasies with actually committing crimes, up to 60% of all men fantasize of rape, yet only a tiny fraction of men will actually rape anyone. You will never be able to prove loli is bad because that simply doesn't match up to real observations. People aren't zombies that see wile e coyote survive a fall off a cliff and then immediately find a cliff to jump off. Give up and accept reality.

>>2981670
That's not really my point. Most people watch horror movies and experience an appropriate reaction to it: they get scared, or they have no reaction due to desensitization. If someone were to get sexually aroused at the sight of Jason ripping out the intestines of teenage girls however it would be reasonable to assume that that person is more likely than most people to become a serial killer and they should probably be removed from healthy society. In the same way, drawings of naked children in sexual situations sparks nothing but disgust in the mind of a normal functioning human. Only those who are of a mind prone to child molestation would seek gratification and solace in drawn child porn. These people when identified are best removed from healthy society.

>>2981775
LMAO thought crime much?

>>2981775
Apparently you lack the ability to read. Let me repeat myself since you seem to have missed it: There is no data to suggest having sexual desires causes anyone to commit crimes. Fantasies are fantasies. The person getting aroused at Jason cutting someone up is no more likely to become a serial killer than anyone else. Your sexual desires have nothing to do with your predisposition to commit a crime or not. You are pulling conclusions out of your ass that don't match up with reality. Why don't you go shoot up your local s&m club before they all turn into serial killers?

>>2981775

>If someone were to get sexually aroused at the sight of Jason ripping out the intestines of teenage girls however it would be reasonable to assume that that person is more likely than most people to become a serial killer and they should probably be removed from healthy society.

That's not a healthy society that's 'removing' people over erections to fictional media based on the vague assumption they may possibly commit a crime in the future. Also, remember where the fuck you are, you'd be among the first on the chopping block for coming to a place like 4chan, because obviously people who go to 4chan must have a higher chance of becoming serial killers.

>>2981788
>Your sexual desires have nothing to do with your predisposition to commit a crime or not

"In sum, participants who reported engaging in deviant behaviors also reported having
fantasies about those behaviors. Note that in every case, the deviant behavior was more
highly correlated with its corresponding fantasy than with any other fantasy category.
Together, these results support the notion of specificity in sexual deviance."

https://www.ncjrs.gov/App/Publications/abstract.aspx?ID=247856

>>2981780
>>2981805
Treating mental illness to prevent murder and rape =/= punishment

>>2981822
all thumbs are fingers but not all fingers are thumbs anon

>>2981829
Cop out bullshit

>>2981822
Nice try, pseud that only reads half of the abstract of studies. The study is linking people who ALREADY COMMITTED DEVIANT ACTS to HAVING HAD FANTASIES. Actually read your fucking studies you retard. IT SAYS THE OPPOSITE OF WHAT YOU THINK IT DOES. MAINLY PEOPLE WITH PREEXISTING DISPOSITIONS TO COMMIT CRIMES WILL COMMIT CRIMES.

> Interestingly, our overall rate of 95% approaches the overall rates of incurring any sexual fantasy (see Leitenberg & Henning, 1995). Thus, the results suggest that if one has had a sexual fantasy, one has probably had a deviant sexual antasy.

>However, as with most previous research findings, the causal nature of this relationship cannot be determined by our data. That is, it is unclear if (a) fantasies encourage the acting out of behaviors, (b) fantasies represent active reliving of previous acts, or (c) some third variable (e.g., sex drive) independently generates both fantasies and behavior. Combinations of these three are also possible.

>Only a subset of those with fantasies also report carrying out the behavior.

>Only one personality variable was consistently associated with both fantasies and behavior, namely, psychopathy, as measured with a self-report instrument. Psychopathy also proved to be the key moderator of behavioral consequences. First, it helped isolate the sub-set of individuals for whom sexually deviant fantasies do translate into behavior. Second, it helped isolate the subset of individuals for whom pornography consumption was related to deviant sexual behavior. In short, claims for these two controversial links were sustained only in this particularly susceptible subgroup.

>Deviant sexual fantasies are rampant among nonoffender samples and should not be solely used to infer corresponding deviant behavior.

>>2981855
>IT SAYS THE OPPOSITE OF WHAT YOU THINK IT DOES

What do you think that I think the study says? That fantasies lead to the acting out if those fantasies? If you had actually read my posts instead of sperging out you'd know that that isn't true. I claimed exactly what the study shows to be true, which is that deviant sexual fantasies and deviant sexual behaviors are related.

>>2981863
Memory of a goldfish? You just said that if someone pops a boner over a murder scene they're more likely to become a serial killer. Let me quote you so you can't weasel away from it:
>If someone were to get sexually aroused at the sight of Jason ripping out the intestines of teenage girls however it would be reasonable to assume that that person is more likely than most people to become a serial killer and they should probably be removed from healthy society.
Then, you quoted what I said before pasting your shitty abstract:
>Your sexual desires have nothing to do with your predisposition to commit a crime or not
What I said is what the study SUPPORTS. Sexual fantasies and behaviors are NOT directly related. It even explicitly says you cannot link fantasies with behavior. Deviance is prevalent in MOST PEOPLE. The study supports the view that if you are a psychopath, and you have committed a sexually deviant act, you are very likely to have had a deviant fantasy too. If deviant fantasies are prevalent among 90% of the population, and if people who have deviant behaviors are a tiny subset of that who are also mainly psychopaths, That is NOT 'deviant sexual fantasies are related to deviant behaviors.' That is 'being a psychopath is related to carrying out deviant behaviors, and we don't know if the fantasies come before or after the behavior.' Fucking read you idiot.

I came here for my weeb furshit, not for an in depth analysis of whether or not I would rape a werewolf schoolgirl and how that is or is not related to my consumption of furry porn

>>2981885
>You just said that if someone pops a boner over a murder scene they're more likely to become a serial killer

Yes. That is what the study shows. You confuse cause with correlation. The study does not provide a disclaimer dismissing a correlational relationship, it directly provides a correlational relationship. It dismisses a causal relationship, a relationship I never claimed existed. Causation was never the basis of my argument. The fact that child rapists have had frequent fantasies of raping children before they committed their crimes means that people who frequently fantasize about raping children are more likely than the general population of doing so.

File: 1494686022490.jpg (66KB, 599x605px) Image search: [Google]

66KB, 599x605px

Why the fuck are you guys STILL feeding the troll?

>>2981903
All I'm saying is that I wouldn't trust you with my dog

>>2981915
And there's clearly a janitor or someone here, because he keeps deleting shit. Why haven't you fucking banned the shit stirrer yet?

>>2981920
>opinions I don't like should be banned

>>2981923
>I should be able to spout my retarded opinions anywhere and everywhere and derail threads

Go to /pol/ if you want to that so much. This is a thread for posting art webms.

>>2981916
we don't need your approval

>>2981926
>I should be able to post drawn child porn on a board that explicitly bans it without any objection whatsoever

Stop being a manchild

>>2981929
Clearly rules don't matter here if you're still not banned, boot licker.

File: loli disney.gif (2MB, 180x205px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 180x205px

Pedofriend here. It's true that many pedos are into lolicon, but most people who are into loli are def not pedos. And actually, most other pedofriends I've met don't like lolicon. I've heard they call it "cartoon crap."

>>2981929
>people sperging out about a particular artstyle

fucking hell... I wish people would just grow up already. you don't really care about this. something else is going on with people like you. go make peace with your dad who never hugged you.

>>2981904
No, that is the opposite of what the study says. It says MOST people have deviant fantasies, and MOST people DON'T have deviant behaviors. That means there is NO correlation between having fantasies and having behaviors, except in the case that you are in the tiny subset of people who are psychopathic, which is the group of people who had ALREADY had deviant behavior, which is what the study correlated. People who have deviant behavior will have had deviant fantasies. People who have deviant fantasies will not necessarily have deviant behaviors.

People who jack off to loli are no more likely to molest a child, but people who molest children are more likely to have jacked off to loli. If your asinine two-way street logic were true, then based on the fact that the study concluded that most people have deviant fantasies, most people should also have deviant behaviors...Which is not what the study concludes. So what I've been saying is validated by the study: What you jack off to doesn't make you are more likely to commit crimes, because people aren't zombies that immediately act out what they see in fiction.

>>2981947
i hope you get fucking lynched and ripped apart by dogs. you shouldnt exist. the best thing you could do for everyone would be to fucking kill yourself you defect human piece of trash.

File: 1412742306853.gif (1000KB, 500x322px) Image search: [Google]

1000KB, 500x322px

>>2966743
>>2966720

>>2981993
This

>>2981993
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GbJO59nWQRU

File: e.jpg (11KB, 210x240px) Image search: [Google]

11KB, 210x240px

>>2981993
>>2982005
Why? I've never touched a kid and never will, so what does it matter?

>>2982003
Look at >>2963885

what's a good slightly untapped niche I can exploit on patreon? shota? or is the market already saturated with that?

>>2982023
>shota?
patreon bans that

>>2982025
what's a fetish patreon doesn't ban?

>>2964533

is that adam sandler?

>>2982015
that doesnt matter. even the fact that you are attracted to children means you are fucking defect. you shouldnt even exist. hang yourself.

File: file.png (172KB, 480x360px) Image search: [Google]

172KB, 480x360px

>>2982059
>not being attracted to those hot little things
It's clearly you who's defect

no more webms?

File: 1490500870891.jpg (146KB, 1223x915px) Image search: [Google]

146KB, 1223x915px

>>2969575
thanks anon. This applies to a lot of other fields too, where there's something you can specialize in. As long as it 'works' or at least has some sort of positive impact, that's enough.

File: Sleeping Beauty.webm (1MB, 480x360px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 480x360px

>>2984541
Here's your webm, you WHORE!

File: Sleeping Beauty2.webm (1MB, 480x360px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 480x360px

>>2984541
>>2984831

>>2967192
im crying anon

File: 1479416386647.png (240KB, 408x312px) Image search: [Google]

240KB, 408x312px

>>2984831
>>2984834
thank you daddy

>>2963726
Kek

File: darkdickdays.png (174KB, 408x312px) Image search: [Google]

174KB, 408x312px

>>2985015
fixed it for ya

>>2964533
fucking hate it when people attempt stylized typography with no fucking semblance of even the basics. just stick to Times people...

thread full of degenerate anime and fur faggot bullshit. someone finally posts real art

>>2967192

thank you anon

File: file.png (1MB, 1500x1128px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1500x1128px

>>2985084
It's the movie's official font, m8

>>2978682
yes
post more

>>2984834
holy shit I've been enlightened

File: 1353210103334.jpg (74KB, 409x535px) Image search: [Google]

74KB, 409x535px

>>2985094
>>2985084

>>2963726
lel

>>2985094
look again, m8

>>2980153
So what you're essentially saying is that people who endulge in lolicon are just as likely to abuse a child as someone who isn't mentally ill?
Fuck off already.

>>2967717
>>2967556
Sometimes they do it because they get touchy due to their art being reposted too much.

>>2978806
hot. funny how this is still up despite the others being removed. nice consistency, mods. you bunch of retards. ;)

>>2989364
Shut the fuck up and post webms, I don't care if you're pro- or anti-loli

Can we start a new webm thread without all the bullshit?

>>2967119
i aint gonna clicking that furry shit!

>>2981947
>>2982015
>>2982064
> a fucking pedophile with smug anime pics A FUCKING PEDOPHILE and almost no reaction from other anons

God i hate this world

>>2963726
Whoa...

File: 1433633069165.png (122KB, 1275x1080px) Image search: [Google]

122KB, 1275x1080px

>>2991230
Here's your (you)

>>2991230
None of those images are from anime

>>2991230
4chan would be just the perfect website if it weren't filled with so many degenerates.
For example there's a game development general in /vg/ which is fun. You see people developing all kinds of interesting stuff and then some pedodev like Gogem posts his project and ruins everything.

>>2991230
And I sometimes hate this website but you gotta suck it up. Liking loli has been common in 4chan since its original.

>>2991304
*since its origins

>>2991274
4chan would be the perfect website if it weren't for moralfags and normalfags like you, like it were in the old days. Fuck off to tumblr, this place should be infested with pedos and autistic furry drug users not a bunch of chads.

Well, guess it is too late now, this fucking site is dead.

>>2992469
stop giving him [YOU]s and it would be so much better

Well, this thread turned shit.

>>2992534
I don't have any more webms of people drawing. If only other people would contribute instead of arguing over 'moralfags' and whatnot like morons

>>2976660
get help

>>2967110
>good
Its less important to be good, and more important to understand your audience. Most popular artists, especially among furries, know exactly what their audience likes, and knows exactly how to pander to them to get more money in the way of patreon/commissions.
It also helps to be really into what is being drawn.