Donut steel

>>2943880
none, because your art is shit nobody cares for it.

otherwise somebody would be paying, and you would had already signed a contract stipulating that

>>2943946
I just want to post my shit without someone making money of it, so which do I choose?

>>2943953
death penalty for derivative uses license

>>2943880
I hope we get an actual answer to this - this is an interesting topic.

>>2943880
I think anything you create is "licensed" under all-rights-reserved copyright, although it's not really official until you file a copyright claim. I looked this up a few years ago so I might be wrong

>>2943880
theres 3 attributes basically

non derivative = only carbon copy, no recolors or w.e
non commercial= dont make money with it
sharealike= basically, whoever makes a recolor or whatever of your work is not allowed to copyright it himself, so if he recolors he may not disallow further recolors of his version

to meet the conditions of "he shouldn't make money of my shit" all you need is an attribution non commercial license, which basically means he has to cite you as author and not make money of it, if you don't want anybody tampering with it, add "no derivs"

If people are drawing and selling prints and merch of copyrighted characters what makes you think you'll ever be safe? The law doesn't protect you.

What are you going to do if I steal your art, pussy?

>>2944194
ill cry about it

>>2943880
Why did you write "donut" instead of "do not"? It's retarded.

>>2943880
Just put a watermark on your ''oc's'' and you will be fine