Crosshatching is shit and looks shit.
When it looks good it looks good like any style
>>2939539
Have you tried not being shit at drawing? It seems to solve a vast majority of art related problems.
Hatching is a god-tier technique, as it can both suggest tone and reinforce your volumes with thousands of cross-contour lines.
>>2939539
You're shit and look like shit.
>>2939547
perfect woman type right there
>>2939547
>tfw you'll never be able to draw like Robert Crumb and be successful
JUST
>>2939548
Needs improvement.
>>2939547
THICC
>>2939555
One will give you a dozen sons, riding on a horseback straight out of her lap.
The other will give you STDs.
Choose wisely.
You can't trust a woman out of uniform.
>>2939539
>t. pleb
>>2939565
I like this mans flat nose
>>2939546
I'm having trouble acknowledging that these are made only with lines. Look at the bridge of her nose, the shade goes from her eye to the tip of the nose even tho there are only single lines from lower eyelid to end of the nose.
>>2939565
Not a great example
>>2939539
you're doing it wrong
>>2939539
>plebian weeb tone user
>>2939565
>>2939629
>solid / dotted lines
>thicker / thinner lines
>varied spaces between lines
Can you really not "acknowledge" how these can be combined to create varied values?
>>2939668
Blog?
>>2939565
Oh whoops meant you, blog?
>>2939706
Blog!
>>2939678
It's more a disbelief thing. Did you see the area I mentioned? At first I'm thinking these are made with one type of line, but looking closer there is also a difference in line weight, and I'm looking more and more and It doesn't click with me how they get that amount of depth and detail with those lines. Look at the bridge of the nose and the shading, allthough there is hatching in only one direction. How does that happen?
>>2939629
There is a lot going on there:
http://blogs.getty.edu/iris/royal-propaganda-from-prints-to-pixels/
Basically, hatching is not just laying down lines. It's made for printing.