What do y'all think?

>>2935746
First one is improved a lot since your last post here. The second one is a bit odd with the perspective and things, and the front figure is pretty awkward.

Probably the best thing for you would be to just keep going. I think at this point you need the mileage of creating tons of drawings and compositions and through that experience you will pick up what you need better than people trying to impose their ideas on you.

>>2935749
woa that's surprising that you remember when I first posted considering it was over a month ago and I only got a few replies

Also thanks for the feedback

File: Schmid.jpg (89KB, 564x761px) Image search: [Google]

89KB, 564x761px

>>2935746
These are looking pretty good. The values are a bit in the middle though maybe try making blacker blacks and cleaning up a smidge. I agree with the other anon that perspective wise the objects are a little weird. My advice would be to pick an artist you like who you know is a veritable master of draftsmanship and copy a drawing or two. Nothing crazy but I promise you that copying someone who did it right will show you exactly what you need to do. Pick someone who works in a realist style.
Maybe one of Degas' Pastel drawings or a genre scene by Schmid. You have your own artist that you admire, so pick one of those. These two are just tried and tested masters

File: 6y.jpg (169KB, 1600x1200px) Image search: [Google]

169KB, 1600x1200px

>>2935753
>he doesn't know