Something to light up the neurons.

incoming roastie tears

white women are literally the most useless part of the human population. prove me wrong.

Yeah, for a industry that is this full of patriarchal shit it's obvious they can't even see talent and only care about repeating the same, shitty message about male empowerment.

>>2924722
dubs confirms!

>>2924722
>prove me wrong.
black women

/pol/ BTFO!!!

>>2924761

I disagree as brown people are assertive and self-sustaining, even if they do it poorly. White women, on the other hand, are more angry at Islamphobic cucks than at actual terrorist attacks.

>>2924715
This really made me think

File: fag.png (144KB, 1166x674px) Image search: [Google]

144KB, 1166x674px

>>2924765
>you're a cuck (lol) if you don't take it up the ass from an alien bronze age religion for double-digit IQ goatfucking beardniggers

Nice try Lars

But the females that do work in the industry outshine their male counterparts. See Karla Ortiz, Jana Schirmer, etc.

Also work on your art instead of shitposting OP

>>2924773

I call you cucks because you only bitch about them on the web while simultaneously having your women turn on you for Abdul everytime. I'm with an asian chick now, so much better.

>>2924777
Post your work faggot instead of criticizing art.

And I get why autistic girls outshine males with people like you around.

Females lack objectivity, they can never become great artists

>Men are more likely to succeed and exist professionally in fields oversaturated with other men
Hmm, really makes you think

>>2924793
mmmm, patriarchate?

>>2924799
Generally, yes. Both historically and in a contemporary context, art as a professional field has always been a sort of "boy's club".

>>2924805

What's preventing you from contacting them and sharing most of their interests?

>>2924779
Nice projection, guy who actually got cucked by Abdul and sought refuge in the dusty sideways vagina of a buck toothed mustard monkey out of shame lmao

>>2924715
82% of gallery owners and curators are female. Historically, female philantropists have been the backers of artists. The reason why there are so few female artist is because most of them are too busy being the rich bitch that buys the art.

>>2924811

You place your full faith on disloyal virtue signallers who routinely spit on your face for pointing out a blatant issue, I'm not the cuck here Sven. I'll gladly stay with my gf while your women engage in the profession of oil drilling.

>>2924814

It's easy to be a philatrophist when you spend your rich husband's money instead of your own.

>>2924814
curators are just people who were too fucking useless to be an artist so they became that instead.

>>2924809
Men prefer other men when it comes to work, generally, often because of subliminal thoughts like >>2924789 (as opposed to merit). There are obviously exceptions, but it's generally the case that male-dominated fields stay that way (especially in the advent of many people in the west pushing back against what they consider regressive, anti-male/anti-white/anti-whatever leftist politics).

>>2924821
>>2924823
Doesn't change the fact that it's the females who have more influence in art than men. Women pay, men cuck the art out.

Jesus Christ, you faggots are insecure as fuck. Who the fuck cares what women do? Stop projecting your insecurities into them and actually start working on your art.

>>2924828
How about you stop being a pussy and join the "masculine" art field instead of complaining about it?

>>2924715
>back to /ic/ after weeks
>same /pol/shit everywhere
sure go ahead, keep circlejerking about your white skin and superior genes, your art is and will always remain worthless shit.

>>2924722
they are used to make white men who made everything you use

>>2924843
>stating facts in response to questions is now complaining

>>2924843
There are obviously women trying to enter the field, going by statistics alone, but because men are gatekeepers who want a boys kleb, they're not succeeding.
How did you fail to grasp this?

has there ever been a single worthwhile post on this site that contained the word "cuck"? it's such a newfag filter it's not even funny.

>>2924856
gay

that's like saying monkeys are useful because darwin. they're not they're fucking monkeys.

>>2924862

Bait.

Majority of CN are females atm if I remember correctly.

Women are graduating college and getting more upper paid jobs than men atm, that and they get scholarships out the ass for having just a vagina.

If anything, women and minorities are being overvalued and favored over straight white males because of "muh diversity in industry", rather than going simply by experience and skill.

>>2924869
Do you even know what the fuck you are talking about? because that makes no sense, idiot

>>2924811
10/10 hilarious but disagree

>>2924765
>white women
>fuck you, pay me and kill my baby

>black women
>I need dem gubbamint programs and shiet to raise my 8 kids I shat out with tyrone and couldn't afford

>>2924765
>I disagree as brown people are assertive and self-sustaining, even if they do it poorly.
shitskin detected
show us your enlightened blm "artwork" too Jamal

File: 1430244168706.jpg (49KB, 776x1119px) Image search: [Google]

49KB, 776x1119px

>>2924947

I don't trust this jimmy neutron maymay, and until I'm better than every female artists, I'm not going to declare le man race better,

>>2925003
So, how many hundred years are we talking about?

>>2924777

Jaime jones, dorje bellbrook, sparth, john wallin

>gottem

>>2925009
are you really using that as an argument? 80% of the population wasn't even allowed to read or had access to reading until like the 1800s.

File: 1435093060486.jpg (113KB, 646x1000px) Image search: [Google]

113KB, 646x1000px

This thread should be pinned to cleanse this god forsaken land.

>>2924715
It's almost like women are not as attracted to draw big titty orcs as men are :^)

>>2925026
That's not true at all. Women draw those even more than men. Men draw other stuff like traps.

>>2925026
Most of them can just look up in the mirror for that.

>>2924879
What does any of that have to do with the professional art scene? This is a recent change as of yet, so obviously statistics and withstanding biases/slants won't dramatically shift over the course of what, a year? Two years?
>getting more upper paid jobs than men
[citation needed]
>favored over straight white males
[citation needed]
>rather than going simply by experience and skill.
[citation needed]

>>2924765
>Assertive = Bitchy
>self-sustaining = government handouts

File: 15801916_1654241661537182_1152918910446600192_n (1).jpg (181KB, 1080x1348px) Image search: [Google]

181KB, 1080x1348px

>>2924722
Yeah but they sure are pretty as fuck

File: hqdefault.jpg (17KB, 480x360px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 480x360px

>>2925035
>>2925026

The most $$$ paid artist in history is female
>sakimichan

>>2925271
Kek
>anon actually believes this

>>2924715
>47 replies
>created 8 hours ago

Not bad amigo.

File: 1471401237991.jpg (78KB, 960x695px) Image search: [Google]

78KB, 960x695px

>>2924715
>its another but muh white male superiorityyy becuz [insert meaningless, made up numbers that ignore context here]
I wonder why retards hate women and minorities so much
also
>fine arts

File: jgfjgf.gif (25KB, 624x525px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 624x525px

>>2925293
nice arguments you have there

>>2925293
this post turns this whole thread into a retarded /pol/ versus retarded tumblrite battleground

[-]

File: 1489203186528.jpg (52KB, 598x660px) Image search: [Google]

52KB, 598x660px

>>2925053

>What does any of that have to do with the professional art scene? This is a recent change as of yet, so obviously statistics and withstanding biases/slants won't dramatically shift over the course of what, a year? Two years?

I don't care if other ethnic groups or sexes join go into other fields, just don't favor one over the other in the holy quest for complete equilibrium "diversity".

But it has a lot to do with it, and this isn't a recent idea or push/movement. Regardless, the push for "diversifying" everything, because, if there is a lack of "diversity", then there must be "inequality" or "exclusion" is moronic and is a false narrative.

>getting more upper paid jobs than men

https://www.census.gov/newsroom/releases/archives/education/cb11-72.html

>favored over straight white males

http://www.dailywire.com/news/5191/apples-diversity-were-proud-hire-less-white-robert-kraychik

>rather than going simply by experience and skill.

http://www.dailywire.com/news/5191/apples-diversity-were-proud-hire-less-white-robert-kraychik

Have some others but looking through my bookmarks.

But there is a cultural and employment push to diversify all aspects of life artificially just in the name of "fairness" and "equality" which is a stupid racist and sexist ideal and movement in itself. Because again, if there is a lack of "diversity", it does not mean that there is a fundamental lack of "equality". This is all overreach from and by the new left.

>>2925545
>this isn't a recent idea or push/movement.
It's only now gaining momentum, and as a result, "just do it lol xd" still is not an effective argument.
>https://www.census.gov/newsroom/releases/archives/education/cb11-72.html
Ctrl + F "jobs", "paid", "occupation", "occupations" 0 results
>http://www.dailywire.com/news/5191/apples-diversity-were-proud-hire-less-white-robert-kraychik
One company that is still saturated with the people it claims to be hiring "less" of. Oh, the humanity.
You literally linked to the same article twice, too.
Are you even trying, anon?

>>2925293
can't come up with an actual argument, what a surprise

>>2925293
Wow, nice opinion here, care to explain it?

Where did you study to be able to achieve this incredibly original state of mind? How did you develop these incredibly experienced opinions?

>>2924722
>>2924765
Typical tricks there, schlomo.

>>2925790
>starts a thread with a retarded argument
>get's a common sence answer
>"this normie obviously is not enlightened by muh /pol brethen yet, le male neurons are superior reeee"

Go get attention somewhere else

>>2925875
>posts bait thread about women
>first responses are "lmao white women suck" "lmao u mad white boy" "oh my god /pol/ is stupid"

You must be a triggered brown person to literally cry about white supremacists when no one asked or discussed it in the first place.

>>2925881
>"searching for mention of white people in last post"
>not coincidences found
sure honey, we are crying thinking about le evil troll on the internet, you won the discussion

>>2925898
>can't even speak English properly.
Yep, you're brown.

>>2925776
Most companies are trying to strike a balance between appeasing regressives and still maintaining some semblance of a meritocracy, to not hurt their profits too much. Especially in the art industry, you can't just ignore the skill level of the applicants and hire purely based on gender.

>>2925911
>Do not have any counter arguments
>Y-yeah your English is bad you fucking nigger, this void your argument completely

Go suck off a grammar teacher, fucking faggot.

>>2925929
That just makes it obvious that women get discriminated, since all employers are male.

File: 1490567842197.gif (1MB, 500x350px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 500x350px

>>2925985

>all employers are male.

Nice virtue signalling with a fake narrative, classic leftist bullshit.

>>2926010
Nice argument dude, are you doing some sort of public speech school? Can you teach me how you can use the "classic leftist bullshit" argument to shut up anyone with a different opinion than you without offering any significant argumentation?

>>2926014

>Implying and pushing a false narrative that women are currently being discriminated against (in the past yes), especially white women, who have been the most privileged group/class in all of human history with now the added benefit of simply being a woman they get extra, extra privileges cus' "Muh oppressed status", so, gotta fill that diversity quota in all industries cus' of those evil white men meme in positions of authority, muh' lack of diversity equals inequality (even though there are laws against that, the Civil Rights Act, read up on it)

>>2924862
>men don't like being around women

Are you retarded? Even faggots like being around women.

>>2926016
tl;dr

>>2926014

There are hundreds of other legal motives for people not to hire women. Be it that they are unskilled or don't fit the corporate culture. You are retarded and so is your conclusion.

>>2924862

Because there are several other motives that prevent people from being hired, dumbfuck. It makes no sense for them to prevent people under the basis of gender as corporations benefit from "diverse representation".

If women are equal, then tell them to become skilled as male artists and adopt male interests instead of making them believe in a bullshit conspiracy theory that scapegoats their mediocrity.

File: image.jpg (293KB, 960x640px) Image search: [Google]

293KB, 960x640px

I'm a female artist. This image is hand drawn, titled 'Brain Child'. Thought this might be an intellectually based thread.

Most women are just hobbyists and post their mediocre drawings online for attention.
Most people do that, actually.
If there's not many women in the industry that's their fault, honestly. It's pretty common for most women to prefer being housewives and do hobbyist work or part time jobs.

>>2924715
Women dont like competition.
Its not really a surprise a highly competitive industry like art is male dominated.

>>2926182
Hey, I've got a title for you

Post Tit or GTFO

>>2926229
I can draw tits and ass, as well. Your comment is a prime example of why many women are intimidated to pursue a career in fine arts. Why bother when posting nude will go viral faster than art. Hell, it's easier. I think we may lose a good portion of artists to the porn industry. Maybe that's why so many men are left limited to just fine arts.

>>2926306
Oh god, yes, less Sparklechildren, more porn actresses!

Whats going on in this thread? :3

>>2926182
I am woman so all I can think about is shitting children from my vagina, lets make it art

>>2926354
Cancer, pure cancer.
I don't understand why anons feel the need to post this shit on every board
>women are bad pet owners
>women suck at art
>women are jews
>women can't into vidya
>fujoshi gtfo
>why are women so terrible businesspeople
:^)

>>2926372
Hey, OP just posted statistics, it didn't even made any assumptions, you fucking faggot.

>>2924715
>fine arts industry
aka the most bullshit industry on earth

Try animation or illustration.

>>2926376
You're suggesting this wasn't intended to be a r9k circlejerk?

>>2926367
I wouldn't expect you to get it, no ass n titties in that one. To break it down for your single neuron- it has to do with the conception of an idea

>>2926379
Well, to be fair, it's probably even less in the commercial entertainment art industry.

>>2926405
Hey, in 2017 women should be more comfortable with their bodies and stop self shaming themselves into not posting them.