Is George w Bush a good painter?
>>2889112
For an amateur/hobbyist he's pretty good. He can't compete with actual pros but that's to be expected. I do like some of his paintings though, they have a nice charm to them and an interesting enough style, though about half of them have some really terrible drawing that ruins them.
>>2889112
No, it's cool that he paints for fun but I feel a little bad for him every time he shows one of his paintings to the public and people have to act like he's not shit.
Look at this segment on Jimmy Kimmel for example, they compare his painting to the actual soldier in the audience and you can tell that he fucked up. Or how he shows a painting he did of himself in the tub to show how he learned perspective but it's apparent that he doesn't really understand it. Or how in the end both him and Kimmel do a quick sketch of each other and Kimmel somehow draws better than him.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sriYmFBvOsE
Worse than Hitler, actually.
>>2889261
Probably one of the only times this is an apt reply. Thanks anon, got me to blow air out of my nose.
in all honesty, I'd rather have an original piece of art from Bush, than sakimichan
having his work would definitely be more conversational than owning a piece from most of the artists /ic/ worships
>>2889261
savage
>>2889328
>in all honesty, I'd rather have an original piece of art from Bush, than sakimichan
I'd even rather have a Hitler original, god fuck sakimichan