or references or anything, I just want good artwork or photographs.
like so
>>2885683
His music is quite good, too
>>2885665
>>2885759
Is this a photomontage? The size difference id weirding me out.
>>2885684
What's the artists name on that? Can't read it...
>>2885770
It is from Demonographica, forgot the artists name though
>>2887578
>>2285770
Demonographia , i fucked it up
>>2885770
Artist for the drawings is Jarrault.
>>2885665
>>2887721
>>2887722
>>2887729
>>2887731
>>2887734
>>2887735
>>2887739
>>2887740
>>2887741
>>2887743
>>2887744
>>2887745
>>2887746
>>2887747
>>2887748
>>2887750
>>2887751
>>2887753
>>2887755
>>2887756
>>2887759
>>2887760
>>2887762
>>2887764
>>2887767
>>2887768
>>2887772
>>2887773
>>2887774
>>2887781
>>2887784
>>2887845
>>2887845
Is that Trump?
>>2887722
Is this yours? I like the style and lines of this.
>>2887975
its not. i have a huge archive of anatomy drawings and studies/references etc. about 650 images
>>2887873
>>2888306
>>2888307
>>2888416
>>2888428
>>2885665
>photographs
>art
Even cutesy shit is more of an "art" than this
Arthur Rackham
>>2888582
>>2888585
>>2888587
T.S. Sullivant
>>2888592
>>2888594
>>2888596
>>2888601
Schaeffer
>>2888605
>>2888607
>>2887580
>Demonographia
Man, that book looks really interes--
>those prices
Fuck.
>>2888582
Meh. John Tenniel is better.
>>2888636
They both made great stuff, you're entitled to your opinion though.
>>2888636
I've never seen someone have a "meh" reaction to Rackham before. I thought he had universal appeal.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uFvptVsptbg
>>2888579
just don't forget to take your pills, bro
good thread
Francis Bacon x Proko collab
Now for some photos
Very well colorised photo.
>>2892347
I like this
>>2885665
this is very appealing to me
>>2892367
ayy lmao
>>2892344
yaas queen i love china landscape
>>2894558
fucking nope
>>2892334
Kek
>>2895566
Watercolor never fails to blow my mind.
How do I learn to do this?
>>2900473
are these plen air??
>>2900479
That looks like a studio painting given the busy traffic and detail level. It might be based on a plein air study though, probably with a lot of photo reference.
>>2900535
Saved these from some artist's facebook. Love the dramatic clouds
>>2885668
good old Selk'nam
so proud
>>2887721
>Bottom left
I'M ONNA NEW LEVEL
nice thread dude
If you're doing technical assignments, I highly, highly recommend that you take a look at Gun Jesus' channel.
https://www.youtube.com/user/ForgottenWeapons
Since everything he shows actually functions, and a lot of the stuff is incredibly unique or archaic, it's a very good tool to use for coming up with interesting (but still functional) mechanical art.
>>2901413
true beuty and courage
>>2901413
is this inspiration to become a fat landwhale fukin ewwwww
>>2901420
This is a really cool and original suggestion, I think.
>>2887750
ic be like "5 months to get to this level at most"
>>2903759
You can do it in 3 if you stop being a bitch and do some bargue.
>>2887722
THICC
>>2903734
Thanks, I am mostly tired of people do crazy doodles of machines that would never work in a billion years. Yes, I know, they wouldn't work in the first place but that shouldn't stop you from giving the illusion that they MIGHT work.
It's the difference between the walking trash piles from Bayformers, and say, Chappie.
You can argue the merit of movies all you want, but one of those two actually appears like garbage put through a blender and then recompiled with all the glue in the world, and the other kinda looks like something Boston Dynamics might make.