this has been posted on /ic/ before, still
i'm in awe of this dude, I almost feel compelled to buy it just cause the illustrations are so good.
80-90% of the illustrations like above we're probably done entirely without reference. even though most of the illustrations are sketch-like, he experiments with more extreme poses and angles than loomis/bridgman.
Those drawings look terrible like wtf? There are a lot of issues with the proportions and anatomy
um is this it? https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=zh-CN&u=http://jzbtsg.blog.163.com/blog/static/43048050201342823046959/&prev=search
>>2884878
*retarded noises*
lol, where have i seen this page before.
his lines are cruder, but his anatomy and perspective is on point, this is what the /ic/ goobers fantasize about when they think "drawing from imagination"
>>2884867
What book is it from? I'm interested.
>>2884925
https://pan.baidu.com/share/link?shareid=2273115462&uk=488643920&fid=162904887312855
>>2884927
Based anon. Thanks!
>>2884927
well made book
saved my stroage
>>2884927
Thanks friendo
>>2884927
>tfw all the boxes are super shaky because the person can't draw straight lines
kek
>>2885342
post work
>>2884867
girls arms different lengths
>>2885342
>>2885464
>>2885464
Is this bait? Or is someone actually this retarded?
>>2884867
how do you download, when i click the down arrow a box just pops up
>>2885505
4chan logo?
>>2884867
Where can I buy the book from?
>>2885928
http://www.ebay.com/itm/-/232056367633?hash=item3607a32a11:g:xjAAAOSwU-pXusNT
unfortunately, not really easily available outside of china
>>2884878
Like what dipshit
Redline them you stupid fuck.
>>2884901
Definitely from loomis.
>China
>>2884867
her left arm is sharter than the right one. and her thoight is too thick espectailly around her buttox it's incorrect
>>2886037
i mean, you're not wrong. it's hard to notice, but yeah. most of the sketches definitely weren't done with references.
if anyone wants to post similar reference to see how anatomically correct the pose is, pls do.
>>2886037
Her right arm is fully extended reaching out and is perpendicular to the picture plane so looks as long as possible. Her left arm is slightly bent and slightly foreshortened (just compare where her shoulder sits in space compared to where her hand is).
The buttcheek/thigh looking thick is because she is kneeling down so it is squishing out, especially by her butt where her heel is pressing into it.
>>2886075
this is why your skill has stagnated in the last year.
as soon as you accept that you're wrong you will get gud.
>>2886075
How do I get as good as you?
>>2885949
Isn't there an English translated version?
After doing some looking around I think it might be:
- Bridgman's Complete Guide to Drawing from Life
- Anatomy for Artists: A Complete Guide to Drawing the Human Body
- Anatomy for Artists
Correct me if I'm wrong.
Thanks for any input into finding out. I've only just come to this board and know little about artists/styles and such.
>>2886017
not him but: foreshortening on the forward leg for man, legs are too short for woman, perspective mistake on tit for woman, low hand for woman top left
theres a ton of stuff
>>2884901
loomis' John & Mary problems lol.
just make John into a woman
>>2886898
I agree about the foreshortening on the man's legs, I think they are the most blatant error on that page. The crits on the woman are pretty minor and don't bother me.
If you actually go through the book it's still a solid educational material in my opinion. It's literally just Bridgman but by a Chinese guy and some of the drawings are a little clearer or more fleshed out than Bridgman (but also might have tiny proportion errors and things too...again I don't think they are a big problem).