Why is this allowed?

>>2864825
sauce on second pic?
looks interesting

File: Staccato.jpg (29KB, 400x283px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 400x283px

Wow, such a hack. I can't believe they used a common trick deployed for decades in different mediums.

File: shat.jpg (64KB, 500x375px) Image search: [Google]

64KB, 500x375px

>>2864825

>>2864829

http://www.pixiv.net/member_illust.php?mode=medium&illust_id=56996328

>>2864825
You're reaching OP. this is a simple, real light trick that wasn't invented by the artist on the right.

>>2864837
They could be unrelated, but I kinda see where OP is coming from, one uses the light trick creatively, making a compelling piece to go with it, the other just slaps it onto the sameface they've drawn over and over again.

>>2864825
the artist of the right pic is much better

>>2864844
Ok. So there's uncreative people doing digital art and creative people doing digital art.
Does that need a thread?

>>2864825
>from interesting style to generic abomination

>>2864825
I don't understand the question.