THIS won the Luxembourg Art Prize >i have no hope for my art

Why does s/he have a vagina on the shoulder?

It didn't and you're a liar.

File: 20160108-132017-gzduazrg.jpg (1MB, 1200x902px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1200x902px

>>2843964
wrong pic
this one won it

>>2843966
this is very different from what /ic/ does fine art and winning prizes is a whole different animal. if you don't recognize that you'll never make it.

>>2843966
I remember someone telling me that they felt downright offended by modern art exhibits, like someone just put a pile of shit in a case and expected him to be too undiscerning to see that it was, indeed, a pile of shit.

>>2843971
is there any chance if i made a piece that is extraordinary and a Rocco art style with oils... could i win?

>>2843963
2deep4me

>>2843966
I could've achieved this by bouncing my hairy ass on fresh paint.

This thread just gave me an idea. Maybe it should be possible to generate art and paint it using a robotic arm or something.

>>2844078
https://youtu.be/7Pq-S557XQU?t=12m25s

12:25, if you embed.

>>2843966
How do you fuck up a thread this bad?

>>2844093
Right on the point. It's just a matter of time before we have an algorithm than generate concept arts or entire movies. We just have to figure how to compute an universe with its own backstory and set of rules then process stylized renders of the computed scenery.

>>2843971
I kinda feel this too honestly. I hate seeing people praise work that looked like it took two minutes. Like some of it can be cool, some of it ends up having a cool execution even if it's simple, some have cool messages, a lot of them are garbage.

>>2843963
Cause most artists can do fundamentals. Technique and solid message is a rarity.

Not that this has either, but that's the reason.

>>2843963
>the canvas is sized 8.5 x 11.

>>2843966
I'm actually less mad this won than if it was OP pic that won.